Several problems. First, Biden's campaign manager never said "the [polls] are wrong." She said that they "CAN BE WRONG."LOL, you re-reinforced what I have been saying.
“We also know that even the best polling can be wrong, and that variables like turnout mean that in a number of critical states we are functionally tied — and that we need to campaign like we’re trailing.”
Which even with Foxes editorial adjustments, still means the SAME EXACT THING.
If they are wrong, they are obviously NOT accurate.
The FACT I stated is still correct.
The campaign manager said that the polls could be wrong. Which AGAIN has been my point since this started with you.
You tired of going in circles yet?
Citation:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...cency-in-memo-donald-trump-can-still-win-this
She did not say that they were inaccurate beyond the standard margin of error. She was also referring to state polling, which has a larger aggregate sampling error than national polling. Biden's +10 point national polling lead would have to drop considerably by election day for the margin of error to become a concern. Hence, her complacency comment.
Your "point" is no different today than from one week ago when you linked us to a strawman argument with the headline: Fake-Poll Alert: Proof Biden Is Not Winning, which I refuted [here]. Your primary goal is to invalidate national polling data because it shows Biden with a 10 point lead. Today you cited betting odds as evidence Biden's "campaign is crashing." If the shoe were on the other foot, I have no doubt you'd be using national polls to illustrate Trump's support over Biden, as you've demonstrated that you'll go to whatever shameful length necessary to support your "FACTS."