Politicians and business wonks are morons and spout enough nonsense that we can freeze things now and look at words for decades to come. This much we know and thus is somewhat boring.
How about we play sell me on both candidates.
What would make me want to vote for either of them (we will skip the third parties for now, though if we want to get someone to that votes cast = funded then why not).
Better if you in a given reply might seek reasons for both candidates. Even if you might dine upon a bullet sooner than vote for the other guy let's play find a reason to do so. Something they might be stronger in. Something that someone with either a different risk tolerance or approach to society running might seek in someone. If we can then maybe also do an assessment of how likely a given policy is to actually come to pass* -- term limits is a discussion as tried and true as "we need to fix potholes" and nothing ever changes there.
*So the previous guy wanted some kind of taxpayer funded healthcare. Got a watered down piece of meh in the end, and since further gutted (though that was a nice legal/legislative play that did it).
The current guy famously wanted to do one of the biggest civil engineering works in history and build a wall through lots of nice desert across a continent. Something that would likely make the FDR new deal look like a random school's acquisition request for ream of paper in comparison, all for what is likely to be a folly.
How about we play sell me on both candidates.
What would make me want to vote for either of them (we will skip the third parties for now, though if we want to get someone to that votes cast = funded then why not).
Better if you in a given reply might seek reasons for both candidates. Even if you might dine upon a bullet sooner than vote for the other guy let's play find a reason to do so. Something they might be stronger in. Something that someone with either a different risk tolerance or approach to society running might seek in someone. If we can then maybe also do an assessment of how likely a given policy is to actually come to pass* -- term limits is a discussion as tried and true as "we need to fix potholes" and nothing ever changes there.
*So the previous guy wanted some kind of taxpayer funded healthcare. Got a watered down piece of meh in the end, and since further gutted (though that was a nice legal/legislative play that did it).
The current guy famously wanted to do one of the biggest civil engineering works in history and build a wall through lots of nice desert across a continent. Something that would likely make the FDR new deal look like a random school's acquisition request for ream of paper in comparison, all for what is likely to be a folly.