You’re being vague and obtuse on purpose, so that’s what I’m calling it.
Questions end with question marks. You made two statements, and when I questioned you about what you meant, you asked me if I’m okay, that was the only question you’ve asked. I’m perfectly okay - I’ve now identified that further inquiry is a waste of time because your bottom is permanently affixed to a fence. You can’t even verbalise the purported question you were supposedly asking, you just mentioned western interference sarcastically, threw out Operation Condor out of nowhere and folded your arms. This isn’t a gotcha - I don’t know what you mean by that, and you’re refusing to elaborate. Why does every conversation with you have to be a tug of war to get any useful information out if you? It’s exhausting.
This section is a mess in general, but we make do. If nothing else, it’s a great containment zone for threads that really don’t belong anywhere else and should be kept far away from civil society. Occasionally you even get to have a productive discussion, however rare it may be.
You didn’t ask me a question and you’re refusing to elaborate on what subject I’m supposed to give you my thoughts on. I am perfectly happy to give you my thoughts and answer your questions, I just need to know what you’re asking, exactly. I’ve given up on trying to engage you in a good faith debate because you’re obstructing it for no reason, which is extremely confusing. I don’t have a crystal ball - when I tell you that I don’t know what you mean and what you intended to ask me, that probably means that I don’t know what you’re saying or asking. I really don’t want to argue with you because I’m getting that feeling as if I was having a conversation with an extraterrestrial again, I’d much rather just talk about Milei than about Operation Condor which predates Milei by over four decades.
You know, the fact that somehow you self-moderate your own blatant abuse of forum rules buried in your "usual spaghetti" (you'd be so lucky to try my Alfredo, then you'd know you're talking nonsense) and try to pass it off as "debating" is almost cute, were it not so flagrant.If you bothered to read to actually understand instead of looking for your usual self-gratification excuse to post spaghetti insults, you would have noticed my points haven't actually changed since two pages ago. Of course you were in fact busy answering to your own imaginary questions and vagaries. as you'd like to say. Easier for you.
You're so difficult to please, which explains so much and yet so little about your entirely misplaced smarm.
Quick reminder that I used to teach English, please don’t tell me how to communicate in English. I believe I once explained to you what “spilling spaghetti” means, I’m not obligated to repeat myself. If you don’t want me to keep reminding you not to spill spaghetti on the forums, don’t spill spaghetti on the forums.
Yeah, it must have been a long time ago and thus a reminder should be welcome, as you obviously forgot the basics.
you proved incapable of understanding indirect interrogative speech so I had to humour you lowering myself to your level. Obviously the other topics made you upset. Audience is the right word as you seem hard of hearing, even a virtual one, even more so since your unwillingness to engage.
by selling them out wholesale to Russia?
This seems like a massively bad idea.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. If you want an English home assignment about direct/indirect speech and interrogative sentences, I am happy to provide. There will be a test, so be sure to ingest this information thoroughly.
Removing themselves from BRICS negotiations is a great step forwards, and a big hit *against* Russia - we’ve gone over that before. Step two is taking advantage of Argentina’s shale-rich and crude oil-rich deposits. Upon closer examination of the government’s finances Milei and the Argentinian congress temporarily *suspended* the privatisation of Argentina’s oil industry, so once again you’re presenting a point of view that stands in direct contrast to reality. I suspect this decision was made to ramp up production in the forseeable future and use the proceeds to patch budgetary holes. Argentina wants to ensure that their right of first refusal is maintained so as to combat shortages in their own refineries, and that in turn ensures that they’ll have domestic product available for use and sale. They can privatise it all when they’re in better financial standing, right now they’re holding on to the ace in the hole.
It’s the only solution. The last thing Argentina needs right now is obstacles to growth. Almost half of the country is unemployed - these people need jobs, and fast.
There’s no reason not to seek bilateral ties with another country. There’s plenty of reasons not to ally with one. You’ve already embarrassed yourself earlier about this, there’s no point in treading the same waters twice, this river is very shallow. If you want to revisit that argument, you can just scroll up instead. Tl;dr Milei would much rather meet BRICS representatives himself and negotiate deals with individual member states than sign up to an alliance with nebulous requirements. That’s a better strategy when that alliance is ran by Russia.
It’s the way every single country that was ever in a similar financial situation recovered. Most of those examples date back to the 1990’s and can be studied collectively since they followed the same pattern. My own country included. What Argentina needs is a boom in job creation, and that can only be achieved if private citizens are encouraged to engage in entrepreneurship. People have to hire other people, they can’t be on the state’s dole in perpetuity, that produces nothing.
Just trying to help. Finish your assignment and I’ll add a star to your signature. 5 stars and you get a treat and a letter of commendation.
Law and Justice was established in 2001, it played no part in Poland’s recovery after the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. and the Polish People’s Republic. The Kaczynsky brothers did, by way of Solidarity, but that was a different time. You’re around 2-3 decades out of your depth. I will say once again. 585% inflation in 1990. Worse than Argentina, and it’s not close. We fixed it, Argentina can fix it - just follow the template.
Those poor kids who had the misfortune of being "taught" by you should sue you for their money back.
This may come as a shock to you, but we're in 2024. The world has moved on, and therefore it is relevant to discuss current situations in addition to historical ones.
One of the surest signs of inability to grasp complex issues is thinking that a "template" which worked 30 years ago, for a completely different context, can simply be transplanted in a wholly different world, by different people. Wanna come back here in 5 years and see how Argentina has been faring under this chainsaw wielding authoritarian moron?
You won’t get your star with negging or begging, finish the assignment. I will be asking you what an indirect question is tomorrow, you need to be prepared to explain and give an example. That’s how you get stars.
10. At bare minimum. I already made adjustments to account for the current socioeconomic climate. It’s a bad time to have an economy in shambles, I suspect recovery will take twice as long as it normally should. Definitely longer than Milei’s term.
You can keep asking as much as you want, I already said what indirect questioning speech is, maybe worry less about gold stars and more about your licence which you obviously bought, and not earned.
Fine. 10 years from today. Of course, the recovery will not happen because of Milei's disasternomics.
The test is tomorrow, I’m not sharing questions before that time.
I mean, you can think that, that doesn’t bother me at all.
You already failed, sorry, no resits. Try again next year.
I bet, after all, it's just one more failure on the endless list of libertarianism. Who cares if millions of people on the other side of the planet pay the price innit.
@
Xdqwerty:
@
Xdqwerty:
