Regrettable, but in hindsight it seems he did make a big mistake in not taking a concrete stance on Brexit. People want simple solutions to complex problems, and while that's not the way the world works, politics does sometimes require that type of reductionist presentation in order to get the public on your side.Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn announced he will resign shortly
Regrettable, but in hindsight it seems he did make a big mistake in not taking a concrete stance on Brexit. People want simple solutions to complex problems, and while that's not the way the world works, politics does sometimes require that type of reductionist presentation in order to get the public on your side.
No, you are wrong. These people know that actual world domination on an individual level is impossible. They know that expanding the sphere of influence of their own political organisation will not work, or that if it does it will not result in a significant increase in their own personal wealth, power and status. They are preserving their power and wealth at a level which is sustainable. Because we are all sustaining it. Nationalism is beneficial to these people because seeds of mistrust in foreign countries grow into trunks and branches of loyalty to one’s own country and by extension the party. Do not make the mistake of believing that these people care about individuals, or countries, or the world. They do not care at all. Not one little bit. About anybody or anything which does not directly contribute to their own personal accumulation of wealth and power.Sorry for my engrish.
People who rule the world are not nationalist because they want to rule the world. They need structures like UE.
Less independent countries implies less people to buy, etc...
Different peoples, cultures are a wall to their power. Because they need to adapt to them in some way.
Fronteirs and walls make this difficult to them.
I never said they rule the world individually. They own the world collectively and are each hoarding their share.So the people wanting to rule the world, actually dont want to rule the wold, because they know it isnt sustainable. Got it.
God the simplifications on cornflakes boxes get dumber every year...
I fail to match your intellect on "the people owning the world" work together in a club, where they try to wall out the good peoples unification of the worlds effort, because ruling the world through unifying it further would not be rulling the world at all. It would be breaking the shackles of nationalists - to finally not ruling the world unified at all.I never said they rule the world individually. They own the world collectively and are each hoarding their share.
Nice try undermining my comment with your snide remark. Unfortunately for you this is so transparently intellectually bankrupt that it is easily dismissed as playground taunting. Keep up the good work!
Bojo?Johnson was seemingly the man behind the curtain the entire time
And whats really worse is that Dominic Cummings is actually a bigger cunt than BoJo.Bojo?
At least google his political adviser.
Dominic Cummings
Every 'charismatic head of a party' is just that, a charismatic head of a party. A face for people that need faces to drive their political decision.
I'm not going to argue with you about theoretical frameworks of democracy or any other term (a la "this was/is not real communism, Islam, ..."). I don't care.Wake the fuck up. The conspiracy is real, and we are all the victims. There is no way out now except revolution.
I'm positive that big government gets payrolled by taxpayers. If you are still campaigning its different.@notimp who do you think is bankrolling big government? Do you really think it is tax payers, who cost governments money in the services they require? Or do you think it might be the corporations who pay trillions in “donations” to governments in exchange for blind eyes being turned to their despicable behaviour towards people, other animals and the environment? You want to know who is in control, look at who is paying the fucking bill.
Another nice attempt at undermining me. I don’t watch TV, I read. And if you want to believe that an awareness that the planet is being controlled by Exxon Mobil, Monsanto, Unilever, Facebook, Google, Amazon et al represents a misunderstanding of the nature of politics then that is absolutely fine by me. I don’t care, believe what you want. It is just so obvious that it astonishes me that somebody who seems quite intelligent from the way you write cannot (or will not) see it. A YouTube video is not going to counteract the mountains of evidence that government lobbyists are getting their way time and time again thanks to their generous “donations”, and in return are being allowed to conduct themselves appallingly and in ways which take advantage of everybody and everything.I'm positive that big government gets payrolled by taxpayers. If you are still campaigning its different.
The video I linked is properly useful to understand the process, btw. You all are one click away to understanding politics.
Such a touch ask though.. Click on that video... I mean, you could be watching american gladiators instead..