And why exactly are the new fetus' cells considered more valuable/indisposable than the cells which created that fetus from either side of the equation? Going back to your argument before, that fetus has the potential to become a human before it's aborted, but following that logic, every individual sperm also has that same potential. You can believe that masturbation is genocide if you want, but personally my line for when the fetus is developed enough to be considered 'alive' in the human sense is going to remain in a more reasonable place.
See, you didn't do your homework. I told you to do it, and you didn't, and now you're sounding silly again. Let me do the heavy lifting for you.
You're assigning to me motivation that I never presented. I never even mentioned any potential to become anything at all, you have, which is strawman number one. A good point, for sure - one that I didn't bring up, but it's relevant.
Strawman number two is swimming in the seminal fluid - male gametes, or sperm, are haploid. They carry half of my genetic material, or one set of chromosomes. Not only are they not "human life" in and out of themselves since they're not independent organisms in any shape or form, they're *my cells*, just like my skin or any other organ of mine, so I get to decide what happens to them. You're acting as if I don't know this when I explicitly told you that I'm fully aware of it. I even told you to revise this line of attack, but you believed it was expedient to pursue it anyway, which frankly makes you look foolish.
Strawman the third are the circumstances. Not to sound too rude, but I can go around masturbating, or committing sperm genocide as you call it, all day long, shoot left and right, and the chances that my gametes happen to hit a female gamete are next to none unless I explicitly intend to do so. The chances that this will unintentionally occur in the perfect circumstances, as in inside a woman, are even slimmer, and the chances that it also happens in the perfect time for fertilisation are hard even when you're trying, and it's the circumstances that matter here. I explicitly stated that *human life* begins when the material of the mother and the father recombines and begins to multiply. At that point it is neither my genetic material nor the mother's, it is unique in its own right and growing independently, whether the mother or the father intend it to. To those uninitiated or confused, this process occurs in the womb, the spot that happens to be perfect for this stage of human growth. You can pretend that I believe sperm and a unique, growing human being are one and the same if it lets you sleep easy or feel good about yourself, but I never said that and you had to try hard to infer that.
All in all a bad show, you should start arguing in good faith, otherwise this isn't going to be very productive. What I said was that a new human life form begins its life cycle when the genetic material from the mother and the father combines into a brand-new human life which begins to multiply and grow. That's a little bit different than masturbating into a potted plant, which is what you're trying to reframe the argument into.