Windows 7 will receive paid monthly updates after support ends

upload_2018-9-9_9-24-57.png

In a recent blog post titled “Helping customers shift to a modern desktop”, Microsoft has confirmed that from 14 January 2020, when the extended support for Windows 7 ends, they will only keep pushing security updates to Windows 7 users who have signed up to a monthly paid subscription. Microsoft also says that the subscription fee will increase every year.

Jared Spataro (Corporate Vice President for Office and Windows Marketing) said:
Today we are announcing that we will offer paid Windows 7 Extended Security Updates (ESU) through January 2023. The Windows 7 ESU will be sold on a per-device basis and the price will increase each year.

The pricing has not yet been revealed and Microsoft is only making this offer to Windows 7 Professional users. Seems like if you want to keep your devices safe, you will soon have to upgrade to Windows 8 or 10.

:arrow: Helping customers shift to a modern desktop
:arrow: Source
 

Ericthegreat

Not New Member
Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
3,455
Trophies
2
Location
Vana'diel
XP
4,293
Country
United States
Switch to windows 10....

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

The only problem I've had is that it's slow af.
Windows 8 is faster on my dual core Pentium laptop than 10 is on my i5 5200U laptop.
Do you have like 2gb of ram? Anyway get a SSD. After you've used one, it's necessary.
 

AmandaRose

Do what I do. Hold tight and pretend it’s a plan
Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
10,199
Trophies
1
Location
Glasgow
Website
www.rockstarnorth.com
XP
16,178
Country
United Kingdom
Seems reasonable, atleast they offer the people living in the past the possibility of continuing to do so.

I will never understand why people doesn't want a better OS.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S9 via Tapatalk
Windows 10 better?? Are you deluded in what possible way is windows 10 better lol
 

Ericthegreat

Not New Member
Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
3,455
Trophies
2
Location
Vana'diel
XP
4,293
Country
United States
On the bright side you will no longer constantly get update nags if you don't pay, I guess.
I bet you will, and it'll be giant and say "NO LONGER SUPPORTED YOUR SYSTEM IS VULNERABLE" anyway for ppl who have never tried to run a copy if windows 98 recently, after the security updates run out, pretty much you go to one grey website and that's it you got at least 1 virus from a pop-up or somthing.
 
Last edited by Ericthegreat,
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

LaPingas

let's go mangoooooo
Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
455
Trophies
0
Age
21
Location
Armada's Mustache
XP
580
Country
Israel
If people want to continue using Windows 7 I can understand that, but I don't see much reasons to do so. I've used Windows 7 for like 5 years in my old computer (not that old - 4gb of ram and a 3rd gen i5) and basic operation was a mess. It wasn't much-bloated at all. 4 months into using Windows 10 on both my new desktop and my old laptop (Pavilion dv4) and really it performs much better (I tried both OSes on my Pavilion with clean installs..) so other than GUI changes that can be somewhat fixed with some modifications, I don't really see any reason for normal users to use 7

Dick move by MS anyways though
 
Last edited by LaPingas,

Song of storms

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
759
Trophies
0
XP
837
Country
Antarctica
I don't know what's more "lol" between this "news" about something that Microsoft has been doing for literally every single OS they released, or people being butthurt at Microsoft.

These paid updates are made specifically for businesses that require older OSs to work with their proprietary software. Only a very tiny fraction of the users pay for this, so in what world would Microsoft spend thousands of dollars a month in research and updates just to please a very small amount of users that have the money anyway?

What do you think that your bank's ATM use as operative system? Windows 10? Ubuntu? Please XD
 

Enkuler

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Messages
97
Trophies
0
XP
456
Country
France
Windows 10 better?? Are you deluded in what possible way is windows 10 better lol
It has built-in virtual desktops* and task view for an easy way to switch windows. The explorer should get tabs in October**. And it doesn't have a fugly skeuomorphism-based style.

*without using alternatives such as BetterDesktopTool which kinda work but not as well as a built-in feature, plus they are not free for commercial use.
**same, without using alternatives such as Explorer++ which do have a lot of features I like, but for some reason it lags on all the machines I tested it on. QTTabBar does the job well however, but you know, the fact that there are so many alternative ways to fulfill such a basic need proves how Windows 7 is retarded, unlike Windows 10.

Now, in what possible way is Windows 7 better than 10? It runs on prehistoric PCs? It doesn't mean it's better, it only means your PC sucks, which indeed prevents you from switching to the better OS which isn't the problem.
 

RattletraPM

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
897
Trophies
1
XP
8,341
Country
Italy
These paid updates are made specifically for businesses that require older OSs to work with their proprietary software. Only a very tiny fraction of the users pay for this, so in what world would Microsoft spend thousands of dollars a month in research and updates just to please a very small amount of users that have the money anyway?
I was about to say that. From what I know ATMs tend to use way older OSes (generally OS/2 and derivates, sometimes Windows XP and rarely DOS) but still this is clearly targeted to businesses rather than individuals.

They tend to upgrade their computer way less frequently due to licensing costs/software incompatibilities/logistical and organizational reasons. If they don't upgrade and decide to pay then MS gets more money, if they upgrade they'll proably do it in bulk, which means many less PCs using old Windows OS, and that in turn means Microsoft will soon have one less OS to support. It's a win-win scenario for them.
 

godreborn

Welcome to the Machine
Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
38,471
Trophies
3
XP
29,138
Country
United States
No, both laptops have 4 gb

I bought a ssd a month or two ago. it took like five minutes or less to reinstall windows. and, it takes mere seconds to restart. on an old pc, it might not be worth it though.

I think my computer is bottle necked by my gpu, which I plan to upgrade, though.
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
For me w10 is fast,and I have been a pc gamer for just about a year now.The only issue with it are the forced updates,that's it.If you are prepared to download the update,and then delete it off your harddrive,then it's not so bad when you have 8-16gb ram with a ssd,and the pc boots super fast anyway.
 
Last edited by ,
  • Like
Reactions: ShonenJump

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I got the Google Pixel Pro buds, they're good enough for when I need portable audio. And some really cheap IEMs that Dankpods recommends, I think the KZ ZSN Pro
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I'd stick with cheapo Chinese $10 ones quality is actually becoming on pair with name brand since name Brand usually quads the price up anyway loose one bud that's another $200
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    My Pixel Pro buds shit the bed a month or two ago. My wireless charger (which they do support Qi charging) absolutely COOKED them. Caused some problem that caused the case to heat up to 180F+
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    They were like 9 months out of warranty but I hit up Google support anyway and told them how hot they were getting and they replaced them with new ones because they wanted these for failure analysis lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    lol wireless charging
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Yeah that's why I can't bring myself to even spend $100 on wireless earbuds
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think it's a cool idea but damn
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Apparently the case has a problem with >15W wireless chargers. Google design fault, that one.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I could live with wireless charging if the damn standard case doesn't block connection
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    how is wireless charging possible?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Dbz said everyone has raging energy senses
    +1
  • cearp @ cearp:
    you mean generally, how does the concept work?
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Copper conducting electricity or something
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    @Xdqwerty, power through a coil of wire causes an electromagnetic field to be generated. Another coil of wire can be set up to harness the power from that electromagnetic field and turn it into usable energy for charging a device
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Two good videos from ElectroBOOM that touch on the subject:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQwGjhwPEik

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2YwkAWg0_g
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Elements on earth are actually more powerful than we think
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Wow I can't believe I've been watching ElectroBOOM for that long. I remember when that first video came out lol
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @Sicklyboy, i think wire chargers are more practical
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    but im too stupid to know
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Wired is better for faster charge but if you just leave it all night while you sleep it's good
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Most wireless pads can only max 15w while average bricks are 65w
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @K3Nv2, i heard it isnt good
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: @K3Nv2, i heard it isnt good