I.... I just don't have the energy to care about commenting about your personal insecurities.
Because the
real topic is the one that's important to you: "Trump is helping Nazis."
That's the fun part! It doesn't matter what you think. It matters what the crazies think.
It only matters what they think if you are interested in shaping your behavior around things they do and do not want. (Or in your case, wanting other people to shape their behavior around what the Nazis do and do not want)
Again, it doesn't matter what you think/know. It's what the crazies know. And they KNOW Nick Fuentes, and felt justified.
So the video was so over the top that you thought it wasn't real? Then when you saw that it was real, you thought it was hilarious? Great to know that you don't take things seriously. Those same people marched in Charlottesville, and were then justified by having a sitting president waffle on denouncing them by saying there were "very fine people on both sides". See the pattern?
If you took the video seriously, then you'd also notice that they blame the media for them wanting to get involved. I don't exactly know what information you are getting from that video.
I still also don't understand what you are doing with this "very fine people on both sides" point. He says in the same interview,"I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally–but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."
Seeing as he clarified his point, relatively immediately, as in the same conversation, I don't see why you would try to be so disingenuous to argue it.
What?! When did I say that ALL right wing people are Nazi's. That's what you're trying to say that I think here, correct? I said all Nazi's are right wing. Not the other way around.
If I were to assume reality worked according to your linear chart, it's completely useless at explaining why Nazis would help Democrats get Trump to lose. I am not saying that you think all right wing people are Nazi's, but saying all Nazi's are "right wing" when some of their activities are funded by and end up serving Democrat interest; points out the inconsistency of how we understand political ties and associations.
THAT'S "cutting"? How so? He calls everyone that goes against him a podophile, thug, pervert, crack addict, dog, etc. That's not "cutting", that's just whiny and repetitive. He's threatened to sue them (the Lincoln project), then they goaded him on to do it, because they know they'd embarrass him. If you want cutting, check out some of these. They're all gold:
Are you siding with the Lincoln project over Trump?
Look, I responded to this:
That's just silly. Did you know the the Tiki brand CEO released a statement because of it?
“TIKI Brand is not associated in any way with the events that took place in Charlottesville and are deeply saddened and disappointed, We do not support their message or the use of our products in this way. Our products are designed to enhance backyard gatherings and to help family and friends connect with each other at home in their yard.”
Quite funny that a torch company CEO does a better job of saying white supremacists suck more than the President of the US.
Not only does Tiki rejecting the Tiki Torch as a symbol for "Nazis" support my claim about what makes a symbol a symbol, but Trump responding the way he did shows your "Quite funny that a torch company CEO does a better job of saying white supremacists suck more than the President of the US" to be false in this context. I don't see the point in shifting the conversation into about what other people said about Trump, that's not the point at all.
I'm not American, so I'm not getting much. But what I WOULD like is a stable super power who doesn't have a moron still in the running for the next president. Pointing out how he's a moron is my contribution.
It's hard to tell which concerns of yours are genuine or if you are just more interested in driving the narrative as a means to an end. It seems you would have me believe that you are afraid of the Nazis, Trump is a Nazi, and that he may get elected if we don't stop him. After accusing me of not taking "anything" seriously and then calling Trump a "moron", it's really difficult to get to understand you.
Because you were getting upset over me using the term "side", and I explained why it worked in the frame of the US. You even said that the line spectrum worked as a US example.
Ah you didn't see the "You can only choose one of two directions" as sarcastic (despite my consistent position about this). Charts are supposed to depict and explain reality. They aren't an authority, and the two party system is not laudable in this context... You are falling back to the chart that got us here in the first place; the type of facilitation that leads us to the problem discussed by OP.
It's actually fine to side with Nazi's if they side with Nazi's. If anything the communists are worse
I don't know if the Democrats who paid for or support the Nazi activity were actually Democrats, if we are to apply the linear spectrum. It maybe true that Communism has caused more death than Nazism and maybe society is a little biased when choosing its enemies, but to "side with someone" is different than "siding with an ideology". So, yes, it's okay to side with someone who coincidentally is a Nazi. Siding with a Nazi because you believe in Nazi ideology is the nonsense image people like
@titan_tim want to associate with Trump, despite the Nazis saying "we don't want him".
We'd have to assume
@titan_tim understands Nazis better than a Nazi.