[Rumor] Asus leaks AMD Bulldozer (Zambezi) specs?

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by DSGamer64, May 22, 2011.

  1. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Source

    The FX Turbocore is based on TDP. So when only one or two cores are being utilized the FX boards will automatically overclock those cores up to 125w, compared to only 95w on the lower end models. While this may not affect overclockers, for the general public this could be huge. IF the 8130P does say 4.5 turbo core on eight cores at 125w you could see stock Turbo cores of 5Ghz on one core. Put that into a single thread benchmark at stock clocks for a review and even if IPC is down on Sandy Bridge it will be hard for Sandy Bridge to beat it with a Turbo of only 3.8Ghz stock. Looks like it's pretty promising to me if the article is true.

    There are images linked in the article if you wish to view the new board from Asus which looks pretty sexy.
     


  2. purechaos996

    purechaos996 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    766
    99
    Nov 5, 2008
    United States
    Connecticut
    8 Core CPU's Yes Please [​IMG] Anyone know when these are supposed to be released? I now have to decide to wait for these or buy myself the i7 2600k....
     
  3. sergster1

    sergster1 GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    472
    34
    Sep 12, 2009
    United States
    New York
    F-F-F-F-F-FOUR POINT TWO GIGAHERTZ PROCESSOR PER CORE.... I musta been raptured yesterday as im in heaven
     
  4. Dangy

    Dangy GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    1,406
    15
    Apr 5, 2009
    United States
    What now, Intel?
     
  5. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Release is in a month's time from now, so expect them to be a little more readily available a few weeks after they launch. I'd say give it a month after release before deciding and seeing what the benchmarks are like.
     
  6. Rabbi Nevins

    Rabbi Nevins GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    1
    Apr 12, 2006
    United States
    Michigan, USA
    NOOOOO why did I just buy an i5 2500k [​IMG]
     
  7. granville

    granville GBAtemp Goat

    Member
    4,977
    212
    Aug 24, 2007
    United States
    Naples, Florida
    I'm more interested in the actual benchmarks in a real world scenario than hearing about the clock speeds. They tell us very little in terms of performance. An i7 CPU can beat a Phenom II x4 CPU clock-for-clock at the same frequency. It'll be interesting to see how Bulldozer fares against i7.
     
  8. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Might as well have bought an X6, only the i7 beats it out in performance.
     
  9. Chhotu uttam

    Chhotu uttam DOH HO HO HO

    Member
    864
    30
    Dec 6, 2010
    India
    TEH WORLD
    I guess this processors are great competitors for Intel.
    maybe intel will also come up and make some 8 core processors. [​IMG]
     
  10. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    The X4 runs on different architecture, though the X6 is superior to the i5 and i3 by a reasonable margin, while the i7 is currently the dominating processor. One of the main differences I have noticed is that AMD processors run with more L2 cache while the Intel counterparts have more L3 cache and I think this is one area where AMD needs to improve. Sure, you can have 512kb of L2 cache per core, but L3 is more important in modern computing to be honest. Most of what I have read about the new Bulldozer processors is that they will be up to snuff with Intel for performance in every aspect of computing, and the Bobcat processors will be along shortly as well which have the IGP in them like the i3 does. Also, an i7 2600k has more cache then any AMD processor on the market.
     
  11. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Last time Intel tried to compete with AMD on the 'more then 4 cores market', marketing something with a price tag of 600 or 1100 dollars was pretty difficult. Aside from server processors, I can't see Intel trying to get beyond quad cores for home computing just yet.
     
  12. Bladexdsl

    Bladexdsl ZOMG my posts...it's over 9000!!!

    Member
    15,763
    3,437
    Nov 17, 2008
    Australia
    Queensland
    looks like i'll be buying a new m/b again soon [​IMG]
     
  13. DSGamer64
    OP

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Not sure if I will get the 8 core or not, depends on whether or not it benchmarks higher then the i7 2600k which is only 20 dollars less. Even if it's equal in performance, there is so much more that could be done with 8 cores assuming it threads more like an Intel does then the current models.
     
  14. Chhotu uttam

    Chhotu uttam DOH HO HO HO

    Member
    864
    30
    Dec 6, 2010
    India
    TEH WORLD
    *cough*hexacore*cough*
     
  15. SamAsh07

    SamAsh07 GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,696
    67
    Jan 27, 2009
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bahrain
    i8 is in town [​IMG], or atleast it's going to be.
     
  16. RupeeClock

    RupeeClock Colors 3D Snivy!

    Member
    6,377
    853
    May 15, 2008
    That's true, a Core 2 Duo in single core mode could beat the pants off of a Celeron processor, both at 3ghz.

    Also did anyone get why it's called "Bulldozer"? It's because Intel's been developing "Sandy Bridge"
     
  17. SamAsh07

    SamAsh07 GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,696
    67
    Jan 27, 2009
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bahrain
    I lol'd [​IMG]
     
  18. FireGrey

    FireGrey Undercover Admin

    Member
    3,920
    909
    Apr 13, 2010
    And every spoiled kid would want it even though they will only use it for internet browsing [​IMG]
     
  19. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,103
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Warning: Spoilers inside!

    So yeah, I'm going to wait on actual benchmarks as well.
     
  20. Frederica Bernkastel

    Frederica Bernkastel WebPerf and PWA advocate; @antoligy on Twitter

    Member
    3,150
    758
    Jan 31, 2008
    Hinamizawa
    Sandy Bridge sucks, this is not at all surprising. However, Intel has something else up it's sleeves.

    AMD will win overall this generation of CPUs, when all of the Fusion range is released (Bulldozer, Bobcat etc...) but I'm not so sure that they'll score so well in terms of sales. I mean, it's likely that they're gonna be pricing these cores at similar prices to i7s/high-end i5s. And lets face it, with the complete failure of their past few micro-architectures, who's really gonna buy AMD's offering?

    @Granville this architecture is better than Sandy Bridge by a longshot, whereas AMD's K10 microarch was horrible (what Phenom II's have). Also K10 is out of date, so that really isn't a fair comparison you've got going on there. Benchmarks will only prove this further, but then again benches will be available before they're available for purchase.
    @Rydian nice useless copypasta there