[POLL] U.S. Presidential Election 2016

[WolfSaviorZX]

I'll be voting for Trump but honestly I don't think it matters much. If Hillary becomes president it will just speed up when the collapse will happen. With Trump I say about 10% chance of avoiding it but at least he will put in some policies that will help us after the collapse like controlling our immigration, he could end up being Fake on his positions but everyone else is for open borders so idk.

 

[invaderyoyo]

Hahaha, this is what I get for rewatching those clips and finding few quotes.

Spoiler

 

[TotalInsanity4]

Again no different than when Bush used to prevent certain journalists from asking questions at his speeches, etc.

Erm, who are you supporting again?

Also I'm a fan of Milo Yiannopoulos... a gay against the gay and feminist movement, and he's not alone in that.

I actually have a huge problem with stuff like that, because that tends to indicate self-loathing that has roots in being told that homosexuality is unnatural and perverted

Edit: Never mind that last point, @XDel seems to be idolizing a man that was posing as gay just for attention:

I’ll never forget the precise moment I chose to be gay. It was the endpoint in a process of rebellion against my white middle-class parents...Today, thanks to society’s endless mollycoddling and celebration of “alternative” lifestyles, the joy of rebellion is drying up for me. You see, I only plumped for homosexuality to irritate my parents. But now even they are fine with it. A few years ago, my mum said, perhaps cannily, “All I want is for you to be happy." That came as devastating news... Now my gayness was not only roundly applauded by wider society but even my own parents, what was the point? [...] Since gay people have been so endlessly praised, flattered and catered to by the media and politicians, I’ve lost interest in sleeping with men. I want to feel oppressed again! That’s why, from today, I’m going to make a go of being straight. Wish me luck!

 

[brickmii82]

Erm, who are you supporting again?
I actually have a huge problem with stuff like that, because that tends to indicate self-loathing that has roots in being told that homosexuality is unnatural and perverted

Edit: Never mind that last point, @XDel seems to be idolizing a man that was posing as gay just for attention:

Don't bother, debating with @XDel goes like

 

[XDel]

Erm, who are you supporting again?
I actually have a huge problem with stuff like that, because that tends to indicate self-loathing that has roots in being told that homosexuality is unnatural and perverted


Edit: Never mind that last point, @XDel seems to be idolizing a man that was posing as gay just for attention:

1. He don't hate himself. People who don't understand gays and feminists who don't take to their radical ideologies always fall upon the theory of self loathing as a last resort excuse. Get familiar with the guy and you'll quickly see that you are wrong. As for who am I supporting...

NONE OF THE ABOVE!!!


2. Don't worry, he's full on still sucking lots of black cock. He's not starved by any means, though yes he does deny that people are born gay, and he does call bull shit on the so called scientific tests that prove otherwise. If there were such a means to predict the sexual outcome of an infant, then I'm sure they could use that research to predict more important things about that child, such as whether or not it might grow up to be a serial killer, or worse yet... political.

 

[Temarile]

If I could vote (which I can not because I'm not American), according to your test I'd side with Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (both 92%). I just think that Donald Trump is the worst that could happen to the United States

 

[Lucifer666]

@Foxi4 Do you not think that, even if this indeed *were* a publicity stunt and that his true policies aren't that harmful, the guise itself would have done a lot of damage? Trump has caused an uprising of ruthless, right-wing nutters with no regard for human life outside their borders, whether or not it was his intention.

 

[WolfSaviorZX]

@Foxi4 Do you not think that, even if this indeed *were* a publicity stunt and that his true policies aren't that harmful, the guise itself would have done a lot of damage? Trump has caused an uprising of ruthless, right-wing nutters with no regard for human life outside their borders, whether or not it was his intention.

Nah that was Ted Cruz. Trump is much more moderate, a lot of Trump support is actually older Democrats that think Hillary/Sanders were too far left.

 

[Lacius]

gays and feminists who don't take to their radical ideologies

What does that even mean? Last time I checked, equality wasn't a radical ideology.

though yes he does deny that people are born gay, and he does call bull shit on the so called scientific tests that prove otherwise.

It's pretty foolish, by definition, to deny the scientific evidence and embrace willful ignorance.

Trump is much more moderate, a lot of Trump support is actually older Democrats that think Hillary/Sanders were too far left.

Donald Trump's ideology is very far to the right, and his supporters are predominantly white Republicans. Trump is very unpopular among Democrats and Independents. It would be a mistake to say a lot of Trump's supporters are Democrats of any stride.

 

[XDel]

What does that even mean? Last time I checked, equality wasn't a radical ideology.

You are correct, equality is not radical, it's an old and familiar concept actually. Now how people use and abuse the term, and use and abuse history in it's name is another thing, for in such cases, they generally have equality and entitlement confused.

 

[Lacius]

You are correct, equality is not radical, it's an old and familiar concept actually. Now how people use and abuse the term, and use and abuse history in it's name is another thing, for in such cases, they generally have equality and entitlement confused.

You still have not explained what you're referring to when you say radical ideology.

 

[brickmii82]

You still have not explained what you're referring to when you say radical ideology.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he's referring to the social justice extremists who think African Americans are "entitled" to reparations for slavery. Or the fraction of the lgbt community that forces businesses/churches to support their "equality" by legal proceedings i.e. The bakery thing. Etc... Anyways, carry on !

 

[XDel]

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he's referring to the social justice extremists who think African Americans are "entitled" to reparations for slavery. Or the fraction of the lgbt community that forces businesses/churches to support their "equality" by legal proceedings i.e. The bakery thing. Etc... Anyways, carry on !

Yes, he's right.

I posted this 30 Minute video in an earlier post that goes into detail about the origins of this movement. I am currently building a "from the horses mouth" appendix for it on Youtube as I type.

 

[Aurora Wright]

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he's referring to the social justice extremists who think African Americans are "entitled" to reparations for slavery. Or the fraction of the lgbt community that forces businesses/churches to support their "equality" by legal proceedings i.e. The bakery thing. Etc... Anyways, carry on !

Quoting myself from another topic:

If you support "conscientious objection" for one reason, you have to support it for ALL reasons (or else, it's called a "privilege"). So let's see, I can refuse service to you because you're black, or because you have a different political orientation, or just because I find you unpleasant. And I think you realize that this would have our whole society go downhill...

 

[Foxi4]

@Foxi4 Do you not think that, even if this indeed *were* a publicity stunt and that his true policies aren't that harmful, the guise itself would have done a lot of damage? Trump has caused an uprising of ruthless, right-wing nutters with no regard for human life outside their borders, whether or not it was his intention.

No, I wouldn't, because I live in the real world and I know that the man is not a magician. Those people were already in the voting pool, nothing has changed - he didn't conjure up additional "meanie racists" with his bag of fairy dust and his book of magic spells. You have no evidence that Trump supporters have "no regard for life", by the way - that's a complete fabrication on your part. Last I checked, it was Trump supporters that got eggs and stones thrown at them, not the other way around.

 

[chaosrunner]

trump cuz i wanna see the us burn and no Americans in Canada

 

[Pikm]

No, I wouldn't, because I live in the real world and I know that the man is not a magician. Those people were already in the voting pool, nothing has changed - he didn't conjure up additional "meanie racists" with his bag of fairy dust and his book of magic spells. You have no evidence that Trump supporters have "no regard for life", by the way - that's a complete fabrication on your part. Last I checked, it was Trump supporters that got eggs and stones thrown at them, not the other way around.

Well it seems to be a pretty standard fact that all trump supporters at least fit one (or more) of these categories (to varying degrees);

• Misogynistic
• Homophobic
• Racist
• KKK Member
• Redneck
• White
• Completely uninformed and/or brainwashed by republican propaganda

So I don't think you should be praising or protecting these people.

 

[Foxi4]

Well it seems to be a pretty standard fact that all trump supporters at least fit one (or more) of these categories (to varying degrees);

• Misogynistic
• Homophobic
• Racist
• KKK Member
• Redneck
• White

So I don't think you should be praising or protecting these people.

See, this is what the regressive left does - they stick a label on you, a label they made up by the way, and decide whether you're *worth* protecting or not. You're not allowed to have a dissenting opinion in a free country in the 21st century, you're only allowed to think in one very specific way. If you don't, it probably means that you're a backwards religious idiot and you need to be destroyed - you're too stupid to see things their way. That judgement is made with no evidence or stats, it just "has to be true". Where's your evidence? Or are you just throwing accusations in the wind? Are you suggesting that Trump supporters *deserve* to have stones thrown at them? Who's the facist here?

 

[TotalInsanity4]

As for who am I supporting...

NONE OF THE ABOVE!!!

Glad to hear you aren't supporting anyone, otherwise I might have been forced to show you this

1. He don't hate himself. People who don't understand gays and feminists who don't take to their radical ideologies always fall upon the theory of self loathing as a last resort excuse. Get familiar with the guy and you'll quickly see that you are wrong.

I will admit that I fell into the trap of assumption, but before I actually did some reading on the guy, you have to admit that it's not a difficult conclusion to jump to

2. Don't worry, he's full on still sucking lots of black cock. He's not starved by any means, though yes he does deny that people are born gay, and he does call bull shit on the so called scientific tests that prove otherwise. If there were such a means to predict the sexual outcome of an infant, then I'm sure they could use that research to predict more important things about that child, such as whether or not it might grow up to be a serial killer, or worse yet... political.

So you don't think that all this evidence is even worth considering?

 

[brickmii82]

Quoting myself from another topic:

I respectfully disagree. We live in an Econonomical Darwinism called capitalism. If you deny me service for being "group a", I'll simply take myself to a business that doesn't. Then I'll be sure to mention this prejudice to all my associates and colleagues. In capitalism, at the end of the day, the only color that counts is green. If you deny a group service, then your market becomes smaller, and you will likely suffer for that choice.