-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
GOP proves they don't actually care about states rights [against interstate travel for abortion]
- Thread starter Deleted member 586536
- Start date
- Views 11,144
- Replies 245
- Likes 5
The same media you link have lied about numerous things over the years.The "far left" links that post verified events that you're incapable of debunking
WMD's
Pee tapes
Russia collusion
Alfa Bank
Trump's taxes
Russian bounties on US soldiers
Ghost of Kiev
Chinese balloon being "civilian"
If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor
Transitory inflation
The fact that you still use them as legitimate sources says a lot about your level of discernment. No wonder you have to resort to calling me a nazi. If I was in your situation, I'd probably act a similar way.
Do note, they will never provide a source.The "far left" links that post verified events that you're incapable of debunking
I"ve provided numerous sources to you personally, and you've ignored every single one. You didn't even take the time to dismiss them, just ignored. Why should I continue to provide something that you aren't gonna look at?
Is this you? Because it looks like you.
You see, the question there was did Musk release anything, which he didn't release anything. Anything else other than Musk releasing those documents does not count toward my actual request. So you didn't provide a source to my request, you provided some random conspiracy related to my request from a person who wasn't Musk. Equally, you don't provide sources to counter any claims anyone else makes. You just dismiss everything they say and pretend that's the same thing.
I remember having this conversation with you a while ago. You were put into your place because you couldn't answer the hypothetical that proved that fetuses aren't worth the life of a single regular person. To see you here still clinging onto this just further solidifies that you're a bad faith actor.
Yeah, choosing 500 viable embryos over a single child. The guy twisted himself into a pretzel, and in the end couldn't answer it. He knows the truth of what he believes, and doubled down in the opposite direction because that's what Americans do best.
What are you going on about? The info in all of the Twitter files is Musk releasing documents. Who do you think owns Twitter now?
Because I don't have to provide counter claims from known sources of lies. Their lies speak for themselves. Why do you think I don't share links from Faux News? Because they lie and don't deserve a rebuttal. It's not hard to understand. I've been saying the same thing for months now and you are still not grasping the basic concepts. When I do share sources, your response is "your sources bad, my sources good" with zero explanation. Other times, the response I get is that I'm just a big doodiehead nazi. And you wonder why I don't indulge you people anymore. You brought it upon yourselves.
I am saying you don’t have actual sources because you just make shit up and agree with others who make shit up
So the left wing journalists who are reporting on the Twitter files are just making it up?
I knew the leftwing media were a bunch of liars, but you are saying they are all liars? Hmm... Interesting flex.
Post automatically merged:
If your argument is a hypothetical, then you argue on the same level as children and I'm not going to indulge you in acting like a child if we are all adults here. Learn to debate like an adult and get back to me.
Post automatically merged:
I can at least locate my @ key to tag people I'm talking about.
Odd, the system missed telling me about this reply. Oh well.
Ah, I forgot that was your weasel way out of answering what you already know to be true! I could make it more of a direct question instead of a hypothetical, but it wouldn't make a difference. You'd find a completely different way to not admit reality.
And while I have you here, your previous comment in the other thread was just too brain numbing not to reply to.
Firstly, at the start you said: "Not really. Sam Smith has come out as non-binary and Kim Petras is trans.". What are you talking about? What does that have to do with freedom of religion?! Just a complete non-sequitur.
In the rest of your comment, try replacing the word "Hollywood" with "Church". See how it still makes sense? Yet, you're still going to cling to your religion in the face of all the evidence that they're rotten to the core. They shuffle around their caught pedos to different parishes like it's a game of cards. At least we have SOME people getting punished in Hollywood. Not enough, but it's still a better ratio than the church.
And finally, I mentioned in my previous comment that cults like that are "totally fine as long as people are doing so of their own volition, and not coerced by money, power or fear." So not sure why you'd bring up ones which are opposite to that? Obviously, those go under the "bad" label .
Last edited by titan_tim,
I was just pointing out that Hollywood is trying to attach satanism to being trans and was curious how the trans community felt about that. Not to mention leftists as a whole since they seem to be atheists.
You use "church" and "religion" interchangeably and they are not the same. I don't go to church. I haven't gone to church since I was 8 years old. I did not grow up in a religious family, but my belief in God has nothing to do with how a group of people behave. If you think the Church was bad, wait till you find out about the the teacher's unions. That's gonna really bake your noodle.
Bring up a cult that does not coerce people to stay because I can't really think of one.
Again, you're saying they're satanists, when they're just getting a rise out of you. As I pointed out to you previously, they've been doing it a whole lot in many different ways. "She said WHATT!?!?" "She wore WHAT?!?!" "He did WHAT?!?!?" Time to clutch your pearls! And second, you're making a connection where there is none. They are mutually exclusive. You believe what you want to believe, nothing more.
But the more you clutch your pearls, the more that they get what they wanted in the first place. I'm a perfect example of it. I had zero idea about it. But with you whining about it, I had to find out for myself.
My point was mostly directed at the Christian and Catholic churches, as they're the one's most commonly seen using their power to protect monsters. But in general, the more a powerful group has to lose, the more that these groups will protect their own in these situations. I'm not sure about the teacher's unions, but sounds like the same. As long as they get caught and punished, then society is working as it should.
I believe you used the word previously, so I went along with it. If you want, we can call it an orgy club? My point still stands. Totally fine as long as everyone's in on the fun. Like I said, the Florida retirement community is full of them. Go, enjoy your golden years!
Similar threads
