D
Deleted User
Guest
So your pretty much sayingLet me teach you a quick history lesson. The United States was colonized by the English and Mexico was colonized by Spaniards. Before Mexico was colonized by Spaniards, the Aztec were sacrificing their own people and completely terrorizing other indigenous tribes like the Mayans. The Aztec actually had walls built out of human skulls and they ripped out peoples hearts while they were still alive. Mexico had deep problems before it was even called Mexico. A similar history applies to many other countries south of the border. The Spaniards conquest south of the border certainly caused some problems, but that region has been troubled for thousands of years. The United States did not cause the majority of the problems south of the border and to say that is the case is highly misleading.
"because they already had problems in 1521 that they must still have those same problems in the 1900s+. And so gives us the right for the United States to go ahead and do what ever the fuck they want to other countries. Despite any advancements they have made as a society."
I'm I reading this wrong?
Because your really are ignoring you know the few (but important) times when the states did a little double funding. Pretty much funding between two sides of a conflict, or you know, working around the check and balances system to get a war, underhandedly causing governments to fall. I could you know, pull out my old history binder if you really want me to go through the details. There's a pretty strong running theme with the states dicking other countries and it backfiring hard. (and by old I mean a year ago)
Last edited by ,