I remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
Never go online with a hacked switch peroidI remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
That's not very helpful.Never go online with a hacked switch peroid
I remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
It's most likely that all of the Nintendo servers block you from using the services when your console is banned, I doubt it's one specific server just for checking bans.I remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
Use emunand + incognito and enable airplane mode, so you will block the nintendo servers from going online with cfw and don't waste your time trying to discover such an useless information. Btw don't listen shadow, i don't know why he passes his time giving useless replies everywhere and he wants everyone with an hacked switch to get a ban but there are people like him in this world so let him be.I remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
Only Nintendo can generate new unique console identifiers that will be accepted by their servers.If there's complete access to the switch, why can't all the necessary info be changed to unban?
Hypothetically you could spoof all the info with valid info from an unbanned Switch, but that means sacrificing the online for that Switch (using both would get them banned, obv), so it's pretty pointless.If there's complete access to the switch, why can't all the necessary info be changed to unban?
I don't have the answer for you but hypothetically if there were a single server that checked ban status, what would you plan to do with that information? If your goal is to redirect to a spoof server that gives a "not banned" response I don't believe that'll work. Unbanned Switches are given temporary access tokens to communicate with the rest of the Nintendo servers and you can't spoof access tokens. The server that determines if you're banned and the one that gives the access tokens is likely one and the same.I remember it being something like useast.ndas.nintendo.net or something, where bans are stored and if you're on the list, the Switch displays a "Restricted by Nintendo" error.
3DSs could easily be unbanned. Didn't they also run on access tokens?I don't have the answer for you but hypothetically if there were a single server that checked ban status, what would you plan to do with that information? If your goal is to redirect to a spoof server that gives a "not banned" response I don't believe that'll work. Unbanned Switches are given temporary access tokens to communicate with the rest of the Nintendo servers and you can't spoof access tokens. The server that determines if you're banned and the one that gives the access tokens is likely one and the same.
You could unban a 3DS by using the unique identifier from another 3DS, it works because it wasn't that easy to get banned on a 3DS in the first place. Nintendo is using much more advanced security systems with the Switch.3DSs could easily be unbanned. Didn't they also run on access tokens?
Neither system really used tokens. Well, the Switch uses it but that is not what gets banned. The 3DS used a seed that wasn't actually tied to the device and people could dump/share hence why you could get unbanned on the 3DS. Nintendo wised up and used a certificate that is unique to the console so even if people could dump them, sharing them was mostly pointless since they were device specific.3DSs could easily be unbanned. Didn't they also run on access tokens?