To ensure that humanity can have a sustainable future,

[Deleted member 608654]

lame.

Even the law has standards.

 

[Deleted member 608654]

We could just discourage people from having a fuck ton of kids and teach proper sex education.

Generally families have a lot of kids so the offspring could take care of their parents when they get old. But now that thinking is obsolete due to automation and technology.

 

[The Catboy]

It worked for china.

Generally speaking, West Taiwan also has a rather anti-female culture that also contributed to that "success." When a "success" limits reproductive rights, it's not a success. I still stand by my previous suggestion. Pushing to remove the stigma around safe sex education and contraceptives, while making both frees would most likely see far greater results. No one wants their ability to smash to be limited or removed, thus making it safer to smash is a far better option

 

[Deleted member 608654]

The world needs to a new, more accurate way to measure IQ, then impose laws that state an individual can't vote if below a certain IQ. Far too many idiots can vote.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...wQFnoECBQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2TTjSWvOMMgBegZQZ2oL8B in addition, meritocracy should be instituted with the current democracy, because democracy can easily be hijacked by oligarchs and corporate interests.

 

[Deleted member 608654]

Generally speaking, West Taiwan also has a rather anti-female culture that also contributed to that "success." When a "success" limits reproductive rights, it's not a success. I still stand by my previous suggestion. Pushing to remove the stigma around safe sex education and contraceptives, while making both frees would most likely see far greater results. No one wants their ability to smash to be limited or removed, thus making it safer to smash is a far better option

Even if physical intercourse could be prohibited. There's always masturbation... ️

 

[TraderPatTX]

No retroactive enforcement, luckily for you.

Thank goodness. I'd hate to be caught up in all that authoritarianism. I'll be back, I have more kids to make.

 

[Jayro]

We could just discourage people from having a fuck ton of kids and teach proper sex education.

It worked really well in the 90's when I grew up, so what happened to that? Everyone now is just out there raw-doggin it and getting preggo in wild numbers now.

 

[Dark_Ansem]

I have more kids to make

LOL keep dreaming

 

[CMDreamer]

For a sustainable future to be a possibility, and even then only until humanity's population return to the same amounts as of today, half of the population would need to be erradicated, doubling the available resources for the remnants.

This theory poses many issues, ethically speaking, being the main ones and economical the other ones. Most wealthy people will seek for a chance to survive at any cost, which means that not just half of the population would be erradicated but even more. Also, most capable humans would need to survive (mainly, those that can provide solutions for the wellbeing of altogether).

We can continue developing many more theories, and most -if not all- of them won't have a nice conclusion.

 

[Maximumbeans]

Sounds like you've skim read these ideas and jumped on them, no offence. I get limited reproduction but who the hell wants social credit?

 

[Deleted member 608654]

Sounds like you've skim read these ideas and jumped on them, no offence. I get limited reproduction but who the hell wants social credit?

Because tiktok is creating a lot of degeneracy that would become rampant if not controlled.

 

[Deleted member 608654]

It worked really well in the 90's when I grew up, so what happened to that? Everyone now is just out there raw-doggin it and getting preggo in wild numbers now.

If all else fails, spay and neuter.

 

[Deleted member 608654]

For a sustainable future to be a possibility, and even then only until humanity's population return to the same amounts as of today, half of the population would need to be erradicated, doubling the available resources for the remnants.

This theory poses many issues, ethically speaking, being the main ones and economical the other ones. Most wealthy people will seek for a chance to survive at any cost, which means that not just half of the population would be erradicated but even more. Also, most capable humans would need to survive (mainly, those that can provide solutions for the wellbeing of altogether).

We can continue developing many more theories, and most -if not all- of them won't have a nice conclusion.

Well most of the high pop growth is in poor developing nations in africa, asia and latam. Maybe if we taught them contraceptives and sex education, the population would plateau and decrease earlier, freeing up resources in these dense regions.

 

[Deleted member 114266]

Well most of the high pop growth is in poor developing nations in africa, asia and latam. Maybe if we taught them contraceptives and sex education, the population would plateau and decrease earlier, freeing up resources in these dense regions.

This has been attempted for decades with sex education, and the handing out of contraceptives and condoms by charities and missionaries.

But the only method that seems to universally work is raising the standard the living for a group of people. Once you are stable and your children aren't at the risk of starvation or common death of childhood illness a population's birth rate has so far been shown to turn negative. Developed countries counteract this with immigration, but we don't really have many data points to see if an equilibrium would take place without it.

Japan with its very restrictive immigration is an outlier and is very an extremely aging population. It will be very interesting to see what the country looks like in 20-30 years if major changes aren't enacted.

 

[CMDreamer]

Well most of the high pop growth is in poor developing nations in africa, asia and latam. Maybe if we taught them contraceptives and sex education, the population would plateau and decrease earlier, freeing up resources in these dense regions.

But first, we would need to satisfy their primary needs: food, health, education, a home, happiness. Then they might have any interest on birth control.

Having some level of school education, help us see the world in a very diferent way, full of possibilities and chances, but the vast majority of the "non-wealthy" has other priorities, such as having something to eat on a given day, a healthy body, some spare time to enjoy (something that way too many people don't even know about).

 

[stanna]

Generally families have a lot of kids so the offspring could take care of their parents when they get old. But now that thinking is obsolete due to automation and technology.

God your dumb, who the fuck pays your pension.

 

[Maximumbeans]

Because tiktok is creating a lot of degeneracy that would become rampant if not controlled.

Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

 

[yuyuyup]

nonsensical de;etet

 

[mr_switch]

Just have more kids, I am sure throwing more people at the problem is the only solution /s

 

[sombrerosonic]

If all else fails, spay and neuter.

That would cause hormone imbalance.Recently, you been sounding like a Chinese disinformation bot ngl.