1. Universal controller support? XBOX 360 is pretty much supported on every major game which ANYONE with half a brain can install a driver for. The fact you don't own a PC just shows how ill informed your questions/comments are. Its literally plug and play with the xbox 360 remotes. PS4 dual shock remotes require a quick driver install and you're ready to go. Wii motes require you to sync using the bluetooth dongle. Its THAT easy.
Setting up the drivers can be a tiny bit difficult for someone who can't use google or is dumb. And for those dumb people, get a console.
2. Yes but the compromise is basically a question of: do you want slightly better graphics than a PS4/XBOX one/Wii U or WAY better graphics? Hardly a bad compromise comparatively.
3. I have to agree and disagree. There is no guarantee they will work excellently but they'll always work equal to or better than console variants. The problem you're not talking about is will games always work well with consoles? We're ALREADY seeing horrible frame rate drops on PS4 and XBOX one which PCs aren't dealing with. I'd be more concerned with my 30fps or below on a PS4 than if that will occur with a PC. Adding insult to injury, these two systems sometimes can't even output 1080p which PCs can! And those that do have 1080p don't have tessellation etc. Its really no contest in this department.
4. No, not really. Why would you want a newer processor for gaming? If you buy smartly, a haswell processor should last you a very very long time. The only thing you'd need to upgrade is your graphics card and thats ONLY if you want to stay at the top of the gaming PC jerk off of ultimate super graphics. Otherwise I could probably stick with a GTX 970 for a good 3-4 years and have my games perform better than the PS4/XBOX1 variants. With a console you're compromising for the next 7 years. Graphics and processing power WILL progress but with a console, you're stuck with the mainstream consumer standard whilst PCs give you the option to either stick with what you have or join in with the amazing jumps in technological and graphical fidelity.
You keep talking about newer hardware but do you realise that the alternatives you're talking about have NO way in hell of getting or incorporating these as effectively? You're basically arguing PS4/XBOX ones lack of upgradability against a PC's upgradability and deciding that the PCs have a negative.
A PS4/XBOX one will NEVER offer you 4k gaming. My PC with a quick graphics card switch in 2-3 years WILL offer me 4k gaming. Thats IF I want it. Otherwise I can just be happy with playing 1080p/60fps whilst the PS4/XBOX1 continue to slug on.
Can you still not understand the reasons for? I can understand the reasons for and against. they're pretty obvious.
Setting up the drivers can be a tiny bit difficult for someone who can't use google or is dumb. And for those dumb people, get a console.
2. Yes but the compromise is basically a question of: do you want slightly better graphics than a PS4/XBOX one/Wii U or WAY better graphics? Hardly a bad compromise comparatively.
3. I have to agree and disagree. There is no guarantee they will work excellently but they'll always work equal to or better than console variants. The problem you're not talking about is will games always work well with consoles? We're ALREADY seeing horrible frame rate drops on PS4 and XBOX one which PCs aren't dealing with. I'd be more concerned with my 30fps or below on a PS4 than if that will occur with a PC. Adding insult to injury, these two systems sometimes can't even output 1080p which PCs can! And those that do have 1080p don't have tessellation etc. Its really no contest in this department.
4. No, not really. Why would you want a newer processor for gaming? If you buy smartly, a haswell processor should last you a very very long time. The only thing you'd need to upgrade is your graphics card and thats ONLY if you want to stay at the top of the gaming PC jerk off of ultimate super graphics. Otherwise I could probably stick with a GTX 970 for a good 3-4 years and have my games perform better than the PS4/XBOX1 variants. With a console you're compromising for the next 7 years. Graphics and processing power WILL progress but with a console, you're stuck with the mainstream consumer standard whilst PCs give you the option to either stick with what you have or join in with the amazing jumps in technological and graphical fidelity.
You keep talking about newer hardware but do you realise that the alternatives you're talking about have NO way in hell of getting or incorporating these as effectively? You're basically arguing PS4/XBOX ones lack of upgradability against a PC's upgradability and deciding that the PCs have a negative.
A PS4/XBOX one will NEVER offer you 4k gaming. My PC with a quick graphics card switch in 2-3 years WILL offer me 4k gaming. Thats IF I want it. Otherwise I can just be happy with playing 1080p/60fps whilst the PS4/XBOX1 continue to slug on.
Can you still not understand the reasons for? I can understand the reasons for and against. they're pretty obvious.