Republican party wants to deny constitutional voting rights, to prevent 2022 mid terms from happening again

[TraderPatTX]

Didn't know people can upload a laptop.
Can I download a car?

Have you never heard of creating a hard drive image? Please tell me you ain't that dumb.

jokes aside, I just told you he requested nudes off specifically, burden of proof is on you to disprove that.

Proof?
Also this doesn't change the fact the KKK actively supports Trump.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...ke-says-of-course-trump-voters-are-his-voters
https://www.npr.org/2016/11/02/500352353/kkk-paper-endorses-trump-campaign-calls-outlet-repulsive

Post automatically merged: Dec 9, 2022

one more
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ke-tucker-carlson-election-2020-a9609491.html

He also condemned all white nationalists and racists multiple times. Biden has never condemned the segregationists he looked up to and was very good friends with.

Black people support Trump too. Does that make Trump black?
Women support Trump. Does that make Trump a woman?

Do you see how stupid you look when you use baseless attacks.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

He also condemned all white nationalists and racists multiple times.

Trump has not. And it doesn't change the fact white nationalists/Nazi groups continue to follow after him in high support. If a lot of Nazi likes you, you got a problem. And if they continue to follow you, despite your words, that means your actions suite their interests.

Do you see how stupid you look when you use baseless attacks.

The iorny of this statement. Readers will understand.

 

[TraderPatTX]

Trump has not. And it doesn't change the fact white nationalists/Nazi groups continue to follow after him in high support. If a lot of Nazi likes you, you got a problem. And if they continue to follow you, despite your words, that means your actions suite their interests.

He denounced white supremacy 38 times on camera. You are a proven liar now.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-denounce-white-supremacy-biden-harris

The iorny of this statement. Readers will understand.

The readers understand you are a liar and a groomer sympathizer.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

He denounced white supremacy 38 times on camera. You are a proven liar now.

Meanwhile still sucking up to their base? Several times? If you say something and don't follow through it, it might as well be the equivalent of having said nothing at all. White nationalists/nazi's clearly like his rhetoric AND actions. Even if they are dennounced, they keep following because of what he is doing.

The readers understand you are a liar and a groomer sympathizer.

Irony.

 

[TraderPatTX]

Meanwhile still sucking up to their base? Several times? If you say something and don't follow through it, it might as well be the equivalent of having said nothing at all. White nationalists/nazi's clearly like his rhetoric AND actions. Even if they are dennounced, they keep following because of what he is doing.

But you said he had never denounced white supremacy. I proved you wrong again just like I did on the groomer thread.

Irony.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

But you said he had never denounced white supremacy. I proved you wrong again just like I did on the groomer thread.

Dishonest argument.
Trump continued to spout white supremacist rhetoric, and actions they liked. If your doing that, more than you trying to denounce them, then effectively, your never denounced it.

Trying to say that he did is purely lip service.


Oh and by the way, since you clearly didn't get the irony. I might as well tell you.

I didn't attack you this thread. I was going after trump and your specific arguments(respectfully with some witty responses)
and then you made this wonderful line.

Do you see how stupid you look when you use baseless attacks.

And then you doubled down

The readers understand you are a liar and a groomer sympathizer.

Two personal attacks, while I never did a single one to you. And you accused me of attacking you.
peak irony.

 

[TraderPatTX]

Dishonest argument.
Trump continued to spout white supremacist rhetoric, and actions they liked. If your doing that, more than you trying to denounce them, then effectively, your never denounced it.

If I can show my work, you can do the same.

Trying to say that he did is purely lip service.


Oh and by the way, since you clearly didn't get the irony. I might as well tell you.

I didn't attack you this thread. I was going after trump and your specific arguments(respectfully with some witty responses)
and then you made this wonderful line.

Calling you a liar is not attacking you. I've proven that you are a liar over and over again. And none of your responses are witty. I think you meant to say silly.

And then you doubled down

Two personal attacks, while I never did a single one to you. And you accused me of attacking you.
peak irony.

Cry more, groomer apologist. Everybody sees the true you now.

And since I can't respond to the other thread, let me fill you in on a detail. That dean was getting sexual satisfaction from talking about sex to those kids. That is not sex ed. Showing toys to students is not sex ed. Sex ed has always been about teaching sexual education from a reproductive standpoint. Teaching the use of toys and gay sex does not have a reproductive use. And the fact that this keeps happening over and over again and the left keeps defending it over and over again shows how depraved the left is. It is also the reason why so many school boards have flipped this year with parents taking over and firing these groomers.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

Sex ed has always been about teaching sexual education from a reproductive standpoint.

Uh no. Sex education has always been about how to have sex safely in a healthy manner. You know, wear condoms, birth control. Learning to ask sexual consent
(There are guys out there who see porn. And think that's sex. And try imitating it. They don't ask for consent, tha's because sex education is not taught in schools, or done extremely poorly)
How to clean up after having some "together" time properly, for both gay and straight. Signs of health problems you should check.

Calling you a liar is not attacking you.

Dodge of the fucking century

The readers understand you are a liar and a groomer sympathizer.

I'll let the parts in bold speak.

Cry more, groomer apologist

Oh look, you calling me a groomer again. Do you even know what that word means?

If I can show my work, you can do the same.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/every-moment-donald-trumps-long-complicated-history-race

Here's every time trump has been racist. Consistently he holds shit views.
Like I said. It doesn't matter if you denounce them IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW THROUGH

I'm telling you that his statements are effectively lip service for people like you to try to shield him.

And none of your responses are witty.

Considering you took my download a car joke seriously. You don't exactly have a sense of humor. Anyone who's been on the internet long enough knows that it's a reference.

That dean was getting sexual satisfaction from talking about sex to those kids.

Uh. No he wasn't. This is vertias again.

 

[TraderPatTX]

Uh no. Sex education has always been about how to have sex safely in a healthy manner. You know, wear condoms, birth control. Learning to ask sexual consent
(There are guys out there who see porn. And think that's sex. And try imitating it. They don't ask for consent, tha's because sex education is not taught in schools, or done extremely poorly)
How to clean up after having some "together" time properly, for both gay and straight. Signs of health problems you should check.

Gay sex was never taught in school. Neither is how to clean up.

Do you have any stats that prove that sex ed in schools teaches guys how to consent? Would be interested to see the rape stats of before sex ed and after sex ed in any school district.

Dodge of the fucking century

I'll let the parts in bold speak.


Oh look, you calling me a groomer again. Do you even know what that word means?

Should I forget all the times you called me a Nazi, white supremacist, racist, transphobe and whatever stupid name the left comes up with to stifle honest debate? GTFO here with that.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/every-moment-donald-trumps-long-complicated-history-race

Here's every time trump has been racist. Consistently he holds shit views.
Like I said. It doesn't matter if you denounce them IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW THROUGH

Oh my. He doubted Obama? Where's the fainting couch?

I'm telling you that his statements are effectively lip service for people like you to try to shield him.

It's so weird how his black and Hispanic support increased from 2016 to 2020. By your logic, those minorities must be too stupid to know that he's racist against them.

You present the same tired arguments that nobody believes anymore. Biden actually hung out with segregationists, locked up more black people than anybody in history and still makes racist comments to this day and you excuse it every single time. So I'm not going to take your criticism of Trump seriously. I already proved that he denounced white supremacy and you had to move the goalposts. You've made proving you wrong so easy, it's not even fun anymore. You are a stale and boring person.

Considering you took my download a car joke seriously. You don't exactly have a sense of humor. Anyone who's been on the internet long enough knows that it's a reference.

Because it wasn't a joke. Witty or otherwise.

Uh. No he wasn't. This is vertias again.

It's in his own words.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

Should I forget all the times you called me a Nazi, white supremacist, racist, transphobe and whatever stupid name the left comes up with to stifle honest debate? GTFO here with that.

Considering that you continue to spout rhetoric that is bare minimum adjacent to nazi's, at worst, outright nazi, and considering that I have seen you in fact spout transphobic shit. It's warranted.

Thing is, I don't throw those terms willy-nilly. They have a defined clear cut meaning to them. And I use them when they truly apply.

There's a couple of people I haven't thrown any of those terms at, who I also don't agree with.

For you it seems that you apply "groomer" to whatever thing has your next hate boner.

Gay sex was never taught in school.

That's a strong definitive, want to back that up?

Neither is how to clean up.

Again, do you want to back that up?

Do you have any stats that prove that sex ed in schools teaches guys how to consent? Would be interested to see the rape stats of before sex ed and after sex ed in any school district.

Can't give that exact statistic, since Christians had a moral panic over sex, leaving sex education extremely underdeveloped, and then Trump gutted it because it was an Obama era policy(among other things.) But we can compare it to another country.


https://sites.psu.edu/rclblogkay/20...ctices-netherlands-vs-america/comment-page-1/


the exact numbers are as follows:
"1 in every 743.3 American citizen experiences sexual assault or rape
1 in every 1,909 Dutch citizens report a rape or sexual assault case annually (NL Times NL)"

This is, by all means, an absurd gap. Again, sex ed doesn't just teach you how to put your willy in a spot. It teaches about consent. among other things.

The fact that you don't know what sex education includes, demonstrates how poor united states education about it is. Since most schools did Abstinence only.

https://sites.bu.edu/dome/2021/01/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-sex-without-consent/


"Under President Obama, the federal government continued funding abstinence-only programs, but also introduced a more comprehensive sex-education approach in an effort to reduce teen pregnancy. The Trump administration then gutted the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, restricting federal funding to abstinence-only programs................. Currently, only 8 states and Washington D.C. require students learn about consent. Of these, seven passed their requirements within the last four years. In just 2019, four jurisdictions passed consent education requirements and nine more states introduced similar legislation."




Now at this point, if you wanna keep beefing with me about this, move into my dms.

stupid name the left comes up with to stifle honest debate?

also your not very honest, you dodge shit left and right often, you try to change the subject, you use dishonest arguments. And then when someone tries to get you to admit your wrong, you don't.

 

[TraderPatTX]

Considering that you continue to spout rhetoric that is bare minimum adjacent to nazi's, at worst, outright nazi, and considering that I have seen you in fact spout transphobic shit. It's warranted.

Thing is, I don't throw those terms willy-nilly. They have a defined clear cut meaning to them. And I use them when they truly apply.

There's a couple of people I haven't thrown any of those terms at, who I also don't agree with.

It's only righteous when you do it. How convenient for you. I'd be interested in some examples of my nazi rhetoric and see if it matches up with anything that Hitler ever said. I can guarantee you, that nothing I said will. It's just a term the left throws around because calling everybody else racist stopped working in 2014.

For you it seems that you apply "groomer" to whatever thing has your next hate boner.


That's a strong definitive, want to back that up?

Sorry, I didn't save my notes from high school.

Again, do you want to back that up?

Once again, I didn't save my notes.

Can't give that exact statistic, since Christians had a moral panic over sex, leaving sex education extremely underdeveloped, and then Trump gutted it because it was an Obama era policy(among other things.) But we can compare it to another country.

The Project Veritas video shows why Christians had a moral panic over sex education for children. They knew.

https://sites.psu.edu/rclblogkay/20...ctices-netherlands-vs-america/comment-page-1/


the exact numbers are as follows:
"1 in every 743.3 American citizen experiences sexual assault or rape
1 in every 1,909 Dutch citizens report a rape or sexual assault case annually (NL Times NL)"

This is, by all means, an absurd gap. Again, sex ed doesn't just teach you how to put your willy in a spot. It teaches about consent. among other things.

Now show that the reasons for the gap is sex education in schools.

The fact that you don't know what sex education includes, demonstrates how poor united states education about it is. Since most schools did Abstinence only.

https://sites.bu.edu/dome/2021/01/24/theres-no-such-thing-as-sex-without-consent/

My small town Texas school did not teach abstinence only. They also didn't teach gay sex or pass out sex toys. It was mainly about reproductive health. Gay sex and sex toys have nothing to do with reproductive health since neither is used in reproductive sex.

"Under President Obama, the federal government continued funding abstinence-only programs, but also introduced a more comprehensive sex-education approach in an effort to reduce teen pregnancy. The Trump administration then gutted the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, restricting federal funding to abstinence-only programs................. Currently, only 8 states and Washington D.C. require students learn about consent. Of these, seven passed their requirements within the last four years. In just 2019, four jurisdictions passed consent education requirements and nine more states introduced similar legislation."

There is no correlation between teen pregnancies and sex education. It still amazes me that the left thinks there is a government solution to every problem. You truly do not believe in individuals.

Now at this point, if you wanna keep beefing with me about this, move into my dms.

Why you wanna take it private? What do you want to talk about that you can't say out here in public? What are you wanting to hide from everybody else here?

also your not very honest, you dodge shit left and right often, you try to change the subject, you use dishonest arguments. And then when someone tries to get you to admit your wrong, you don't.

Try proving me wrong for a change.

 

[vb_encryption_vb]

It's only righteous when you do it. How convenient for you. I'd be interested in some examples of my nazi rhetoric and see if it matches up with anything that Hitler ever said. I can guarantee you, that nothing I said will. It's just a term the left throws around because calling everybody else racist stopped working in 2014.

Sorry, I didn't save my notes from high school.

Once again, I didn't save my notes.

The Project Veritas video shows why Christians had a moral panic over sex education for children. They knew.

Now show that the reasons for the gap is sex education in schools.

My small town Texas school did not teach abstinence only. They also didn't teach gay sex or pass out sex toys. It was mainly about reproductive health. Gay sex and sex toys have nothing to do with reproductive health since neither is used in reproductive sex.

There is no correlation between teen pregnancies and sex education. It still amazes me that the left thinks there is a government solution to every problem. You truly do not believe in individuals.

Why you wanna take it private? What do you want to talk about that you can't say out here in public? What are you wanting to hide from everybody else here?

Try proving me wrong for a change.

You'll chase your tail arguing with this clown, the majority of his/her threads are anti-republican nonsense.

 

[TraderPatTX]

You'll chase your tail arguing with this clown, the majority of his/her threads are anti-republican nonsense.

They are also anti-intellectual, anti-common sense, and anti-coherent. I just enjoy proving him wrong on every thread and watching him cry about it.

He doesn't even realize he is the only person on this entire forum defending this pedo-groomer.