D
Deleted_171835
Guest
OP
It probably wouldn't be that bad if it was its own game. The issue comes with it being an inferior port of an old PS2 game. The 3DS is more powerful than the PS2 and yet we've got downgraded 3D models, much lower res textures, and a pitiful framerate. In the meantime, there are superior versions coming out on both PS3 and Vita with several other Metal Gear games packed in. Not to mention the PS2 version still appears to be superior to even the 3DS port.I don't see what's so bad about this.
Anyway, I'll be picking it up as soon as I can. Quite excited for it, really.
Didn't I spend like 5 pages last time telling you it's not a port?It probably wouldn't be that bad if it was its own game. The issue comes with it being an inferior port of an old PS2 game. The 3DS is more powerful than the PS2 and yet we've got downgraded 3D models, much lower res textures, and a pitiful framerate. In the meantime, there are superior versions coming out on both PS3 and Vita with several other Metal Gear games packed in. Not to mention the PS2 version still appears to be superior to even the 3DS port.I don't see what's so bad about this.
Anyway, I'll be picking it up as soon as I can. Quite excited for it, really.
It's not the worst port i've ever seen, but it's something i'd expect from one of Ubisoft's launch titles. It reminds me of their Rayman 3D port in fact. Trust me, i've played some stinker ports. This one is pretty bad still though. And we expect better of Konami and Kojima.
And didn't i spent five pages telling you i don't buy into every bit of bullshit Kojima spews for a sales pitch? He claims it's a remake optimized for 3DS hardware. I call bullshit, especially on the "optimized" part. Feel free to continue thinking i'm stupid for that if you like, or thinking whatever you want about me. It doesn't bother me and it's not going to change my mind. I don't even care whether it's a remake or a port, i only care that it's such a half assed effort after seeing the Naked Sample. That's where i stand.Didn't I spend like 5 pages last time telling you it's not a port?
Actually Rayman belongs to Ubisoft, but I agree, this game looks bad.It probably wouldn't be that bad if it was its own game. The issue comes with it being an inferior port of an old PS2 game. The 3DS is more powerful than the PS2 and yet we've got downgraded 3D models, much lower res textures, and a pitiful framerate. In the meantime, there are superior versions coming out on both PS3 and Vita with several other Metal Gear games packed in. Not to mention the PS2 version still appears to be superior to even the 3DS port.I don't see what's so bad about this.
Anyway, I'll be picking it up as soon as I can. Quite excited for it, really.
It's not the worst port i've ever seen, but it's something i'd expect from one of Ubisoft's launch titles. It reminds me of their Rayman 3D port in fact. Trust me, i've played some stinker ports. This one is pretty bad still though. And we expect better of Konami and Kojima.
It's not the worst port i've ever seen, but it's something i'd expect from one of Ubisoft's
It's not the worst port i've ever seen, but it's something i'd expect from one of Ubisoft's
The majority of what I was talking about had nothing to do with Kojima. I pointed that out multiple times, since you seemed to want to cling to it.And didn't i spent five pages telling you i don't buy into every bit of bullshit Kojima spews for a sales pitch?
I've seen him taking photos of photocamo and a few other things, but do we really know if he is paying attention to the development or just testing some features?The majority of what I was talking about had nothing to do with Kojima. I pointed that out multiple times, since you seemed to want to cling to it.And didn't i spent five pages telling you i don't buy into every bit of bullshit Kojima spews for a sales pitch?
As a mag staffer you should be ashamed of yourself. Isn't it your job to do research and look into the facts and not be swayed by personal opinion? I provided tons of reasoning and developmental links about the game's progress to show that all signs pointed to it being a remake, not a port. Even other posters in that thread mocked you for not paying any damned attention. Is that how a mag staffer should be posting about news? In such a way that members of the forum mock him for not actually reading?
I only mentioned Kojima as a secondary, as confirmation of what was already suspected from paying attention to the development of the product.