Reports keep changing. I see various news outlets saying 14/50, 12/20/, 16/60 and 18/75. So which is the truth?
There really are no winners and losers, no rights and wrongs in an argument like this because either way everybody loses - someone died and there is no solution and no suitable retribution since nobody can bring the victims back to life.Since I know this argument could go on forever, I'll end it now. you win.
Reports keep changing. I see various news outlets saying 14/50, 12/20/, 16/60 and 18/75. So which is the truth?
sounds good.There really are no winners and losers, no rights and wrongs in an argument like this because either way everybody loses - someone died and there is no solution and no suitable retribution since nobody can bring the victims back to life.Since I know this argument could go on forever, I'll end it now. you win.
I too am not a huge fan of the Death Penalty, as silly as it may sound coming from me - a life is a life, but a line needs to be drawn between a human and a monster.
In my opinion, prisoners that are found to be beyond help, guilty of highly-atrocious crimes such as this one who pose a threat to society should be "canditates" for the Death Penalty with a choice of Life Imprisonment while working within the compound to fund their own living - this makes everybody happy since it's up to the prisoner then.
This kind of sentence should only be given by an impartial judge and a board of psychologists that are trained in the field of criminal psychology - only that kind of a combination can assert the potential for rehab, if there is any.
...sounds good?
There really are no winners and losers, no rights and wrongs in an argument like this because either way everybody loses - someone died and there is no solution and no suitable retribution since nobody can bring the victims back to life.Since I know this argument could go on forever, I'll end it now. you win.
I too am not a huge fan of the Death Penalty, as silly as it may sound coming from me - a life is a life, but a line needs to be drawn between a human and a monster.
In my opinion, prisoners that are found to be beyond help, guilty of highly-atrocious crimes such as this one who pose a threat to society should be "canditates" for the Death Penalty with a choice of Life Imprisonment while working within the compound to fund their own living - this makes everybody happy since it's up to the prisoner then.
This kind of sentence should only be given by an impartial judge and a board of psychologists that are trained in the field of criminal psychology - only that kind of a combination can assert the potential for rehab, if there is any, and the state of mind of the offender.
...sounds good?
You can't impose inconvenience on the entirety of the society when you only want to target a tiny fraction of it - bah! A few particles. This is also what was done "wrong" after 9/11 - the entire world was fed propaganda of fear and security measures went through the roof to the point that they were actually endangering ordinary citizens - on a Canadian airport, a Polish citizen who was waiting for his relatives and didn't know the language became restless and after countless attempts at trying to find a translator, he started yelling - clearly upset. The security tazed him to death - his heart just stopped. Incidents like this were re-occuring and are a staple example of why this never works. Moreover, it also instigated fear and discrimination againts Muslims and Arabs in many countries - many people after the attacks started to automatically assume that every Muslim and every Arab is a terrorist, when it's obviously not the case.When I first read about this story, all I could do was shake my head. This is just sad. What was the point of it all? Guess they are going to start installing metal detectors in movie theaters now.
When I first read about this story, all I could do was shake my head. This is just sad. What was the point of it all? Guess they are going to start installing metal detectors in movie theaters now.
Whoever this wanker turns out to be. He should be hung, drawn and quartered and his name forgotten for the rest of time.
Erase this looser.
*sigh* and I bet he'll be out in 3 years due to "good behavior".
We really need to learn to punish criminals more, its always the same people.
Ok. Gun control wont work, but how can it be legal to buy an AK47? Who can think than owning such weapons is for protection.
It depends on your definition of "protection" - some people get a simple gun to defend themselves from thugs, other people live in an imaginary world where World War 3 is upon us and they need to prepare.Ok. Gun control wont work, but how can it be legal to buy an AK47? Who can think than owning such weapons is for protection.
If I recall correctly ak-47's and other rifles are actually pretty easy to convert to full auto. Also bump fire stocks are legal which accomplish the same thing in a different way.It depends on your definition of "protection" - some people get a simple gun to defend themselves from thugs, other people live in an imaginary world where World War 3 is upon us and they need to prepare.Ok. Gun control wont work, but how can it be legal to buy an AK47? Who can think than owning such weapons is for protection.
The sensible solution would be to limit the caliber of handguns available to citizens to 9mm unless a citizen requires a higher-caliber weapon for work-related purposes, for example is a police officer and preferes it over his standard-issue.
As for rifles, only hunting ones should be allowed. Shotguns? Buck and rubber slugs only.
Automatic? No chance.
What you're thinking about is a combat rifle. What I'm thinking about is a hunting rifle. Two different things.If I recall correctly ak-47's and other rifles are actually pretty easy to convert to full auto. Also bump fire stocks are legal which accomplish the same thing in a different way.
This is America, I don't really know why you would assume he would ever be released. We jail more people than anyone in the world including China.*sigh* and I bet he'll be out in 3 years due to "good behavior".
We really need to learn to punish criminals more, its always the same people.
Except we are since we have more things then they do, like the ability to reason and not just follow instincts.Humans aren't special - they're animals
Oh like single fire hunting rifles, my bad. The point still stands about combat rifles being easy to turn back to full auto though, they are designed that way then limited for civilian use as an afterthought.What you're thinking about is a combat rifle. What I'm thinking about is a hunting rifle. Two different things.If I recall correctly ak-47's and other rifles are actually pretty easy to convert to full auto. Also bump fire stocks are legal which accomplish the same thing in a different way.