- Joined
- Feb 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,371
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 19
- Location
- somewhere that may or may not exist
- XP
- 2,531
- Country
There's at least a grain of evidence of Russian intervention.Honest question here: how is "voting fraud" any different from "russian intervention"? They both seem like pretty stupid conspiracy nutjobs, yet I see the left constantly mocking the right for it while at the same time doing the same exact thing. How are you guys not worried about the huge amount of hypocrisy that is at the core of the Democrats nowadays? You literally have Biden saying two completely contradictory things and clap like seals. You guys have come to the point where you would literally follow Hitler to the death and do his bidding with no hesitation and still call yourself "anti fascist". I'd be very worried about that. (Important Note: I am NOT republican or right or left of whatever, I'm a NORMAL person that critically thinks about the different parties without having a hardon for any particular one as if it was a national football team).
Russians didn't need to intervene in the past elections and Biden didn't need to do election fraud; nobody wanted Hillary, and nobody wanted Trump again, it's was a case of "the least evil". No real patriot, neither Democrat nor Republican, should be proud of this.
Not likely enough to actually change the winner, but enough to notice and prove.
We're generally not using "Russia fucked shit up" as a way to claim the election results themselves were invalid, we're using it along with Trump's other ties to Russia as one more reason he's fundamentally corrupt.
also...
"You literally have Biden saying two completely contradictory things and clap like seals. You guys have come to the point where you would literally follow Hitler to the death and do his bidding with no hesitation and still call yourself "anti fascist". I'd be very worried about that."
"Important Note: I am NOT republican or right or left of whatever, I'm a NORMAL person that critically thinks about the different parties without having a hardon for any particular one as if it was a national football team."
You beat the argument to death with the balance fallacy and golden mean fallacy, spout some of the most outrageous claims I've ever heard in our direction while completely ignoring the guys that stormed the damn capital about three weeks ago and actively tried to overturn the results of an election because their leader was a sore loser and they believed him without question, and then act like you're somehow still not biased in either direction.
What the hell?