You do know that the purpose of a forum is that anybody can respond to anybody, right? You do know of this concept, I hope.
Yes but when you personally take the hit meant for someone else, that's something you need to talk to a therapist about, because that's not a forum issue, that's a mommy not loving you as much issue.
You act like I'm the only one that called you out. It's a dumb sentence and you're too dumb to take the L.
You are, and you didn't even call anyone out. Nothing I said was wrong, but here we are duking it out because you lack basic reading comprehension.
What do you think not requiring the mother means? Are you really this dense or are you just trolling?
What do you think "most likely does not" means? A newborn baby most likely does not need to have all of it's requirements met by the host mother. Have you never been around babies before?
The funny part is you think I'm mad. Why would I be mad when you are the one who is wrong? A newborn baby actually needs more care than a 9 month old fetus does. If you were a parent, you'd know this.
No one thinks you're mad. Just a moron.
A newborn baby needs care, but after it's born it no longer needs it's mother as other options for survival become viable.
I'm really having a hard time understanding how you can't grasp basic concepts.
If that's how you really feel, then you should have led with that. I know it doesn't have as much bite, but maybe you should sacrifice the drama for the sake of accuracy. From what I have seen,
@TraderPatTX is capable of having a conversation that doesn't become an edge contest. You are too.
I did lead with that. Just because you didn't understand it doesn't mean it isn't as credible or that i have to leverage any part of my argument for your benefit. As Trader pointed out, this is a public forum so anyone can reply to anyone, but if you don't understand something you don't have to debate it either.
What drama comes with pointing out hypocrisy comes from he who is pointed out. You can call it drama all you want, but how accurate of a stance can one take on anything when their platform is constantly wavering on a faulty foundation?
Maybe instead of focusing on my pointing out of hypocrisy, you should spend some time understanding why people with that trait don't make good debators.
That's a whiff. Your comment insinuates that a baby stops being dependent when it is born. Another clumsy attempt at snark. Please stop embarrassing everyone.
How? Was it when I said the baby was less likely to need to have all of it's requirements met by it's mother? Meaning it can survive from other means?
If you can't read, just say so. Between you two I don't understand how either one manages to operate a computer well enough to make it this to the forum, much less formulate enough drivel to type out.