Who would have thought a career criminal politician that's been in Washington 50 years overseeing the entire destruction of America would say such a thing!
Out of context:
In early March 2020, readers asked Snopes to verify a quote in 1977 in which Biden, then a U.S. senator representing Delaware, allegedly expressed fear that desegregation, if not done in an “orderly” way, could result in his children growing up in “a racial jungle with tensions having built so high that it is going to explode at some point.”
snopes then verified it as a correct attribution
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/
The laps to say 'jungle' in that instance was a no go. Even back then. But the intention was not to demean black people.
I mean, you can troll this thread all day, but if the only things you bring are obvious spin and lies, its easy to confront them..
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
On the youtubers case of 'gross misconduct within the FBI?' the issue here is, that you dont just sue one of the big agencies, then have them pay a fine, or replace people there, based on an open court decision.
If you have misconduct there, its usually dealt with through internal reviews, or a political process in which the people having the political oversight over those agencies make apparent (or not) what the issue is, and then its supposed to get fixed internally, with them following up.
You dont sue the FBI to convict it of wrongdoing to then dissolve it to found another one..
As a result you have those pro forma hearings where judges close to the intelligence community judge on cases in a very favourable manner. All of that is expected. The question here is, was the issue allowed to surface publicly in which case - there is not much more you can ask for, this should activate internal review and accountability procedures.
There is also the term "it would unsettle the public" in which case all of that goes through secret hearings and courts, in which case you hear nothing, because - "national interest".
None of that is shocking, or criminal corruption, ... Thats just 'dealing with extralegal agencies' (they arent bound by law (in a sense within their own statutes they can break the law), but by political control)
Thats not 'total corruption' as the youtube title suggested. The youtuber even knows that, which is why he puts a "?" after "total corruption", the title is just for the clicks.
And yes this might include scare tactics, or public smear campaigns by the respective agencies.
The BIGGER issue here is, that the youtuber derives and projects pleasure out of constructing the following argument. There are text messages from two FBI agents, that monitored and prosecuted the - quote youtuber: "National Hero Michael Flynn", while they made personal comments on text message, that they hated Trump.
Defense used this to construct "procedual error", to delegitimize the prosecution. Its the same as in the Harris case - procedual error (although knowingly condoned in that case), so the accused got free.
Those are not "big cases of moral corruption", those are people believing in a case getting stood up by procedural errors.
You cant get a FBI prosecutor that "has no political orientation" at will. And "forgeting" to mention, that the technician was convicted of destroying evidence in another case, doesnt make the defendent innocent all of a sudden, it just gets them free, because of neglect and malice in regard to procedure.
Those are offenses that warrant for the actual perpetrators to be reprimanded, and thats about all.
Those are not even criminal offenses, or anything close to it.
So how on earth, you, or that youtuber could arrive at large scale systemic corruption, is beyond me.
Have you ever worked with humans?
And yes, for an attorney general the stakes in outcome (it could have exonerated someone) are higher, but that doesnt mean that people seize to be human.
If you set the bar for 'who can be a vice presidential candidate' that high, you've never seen house of cards..
