go to the original post and redownload homebrew launcher (it says homebrew version 1.x)
Last edited by GR-DRACULA,
I am using this https://gbatemp.net/threads/release...its-cafiine-server.431151/page-5#post-7061241 If you have an android phone you should try it it's pretty simpleI'm about to punt this thing into the ether. i copied all the web server files to a folder, then copied the new codebin files and the "551hbl.mp4" payload to the folder....i keep getting an error that says "unable to load file" on my Wii U when pointing it to my web server. no i do not have an internet connection at home, so running this from a web server is a MUST for me. i can only RARELY connect my Wii U to go online.
it's running 5.5.1. somebody please help, if i could just get a copy of the www folder i need pre-packed and upped to something like google drive, mega or mediafire, that would help tons
The .rpx is the same as the one in the channel version's code folder, but you can launch it without sigpatches because it's not a channel.The latest version is 1.4 .elf file right? The latest channel version is 2.1 right? What's the .rpx for?
I don't get it then. If the channel is used, well, as a channel, and the elf is used for the browser, then what's the rpx for? Just a version to launch from v1.4?The .rpx is the same as the one in the channel version's code folder, but you can launch it without sigpatches because it's not a channel.
The zip doesn't include a www folder, which implies that you can't go from the browser right to the rpx, so you'd probably have to go from browser to hbl 1.4 (via the rpx-compatible payload) then to hbl 2.1 rpx.
I haven't had a need for it, but keep in mind that it was released Nov 20. That's only about 10 days after the first Haxchi, and even before simple signature patcher. For a short time, it might have been significant (when people weren't used to channels, sigpatching and all that.)I don't get it then. If the channel is used, well, as a channel, and the elf is used for the browser, then what's the rpx for? Just a version to launch from v1.4?
I mean, if that's the case, HBL in rpx isn't really useful. It's other programs that are in rpx format that are useful (since that can be launched from HBL) Is this correct or am I missing something here?
Still not clear on what sigpatching have to do with this? I mean, from what I understand, the only way to run HBL.rpx is through HBL.elf .. right? So what does that acheive?I haven't had a need for it, but keep in mind that it was released Nov 20. That's only about 10 days after the first Haxchi, and even before simple signature patcher. For a short time, it might have been significant (when people weren't used to channels, sigpatching and all that.)
You can install the rpx version to wiiu menu to dont launch homebrew launcher from browser exploit or haxchi after u apply signature patches or if u use cbhcStill not clear on what sigpatching have to do with this? I mean, from what I understand, the only way to run HBL.rpx is through HBL.elf .. right? So what does that acheive?
I get that it doesn't install as a channel, but what purpose does it serve?
So it's installable? Then what's the channel version?You can install the rpx version to wiiu menu to dont launch homebrew launcher from browser exploit or haxchi after u apply signature patches or if u use cbhc
it's the rpx versionSo it's installable? Then what's the channel version?
There are 3 different versions. Elf, rpx version and channel version. So no that's not the same..it's the rpx version
It is... do u confuse this with the sources? xD elf version has sources too u can check the opThere are 3 different versions. Elf, rpx version and channel version. So no that's not the same..
I'm not talking about the source. I'm talking about the compiled binaries.It is... do u confuse this with the sources? xD elf version has sources too u can check the op
Right. Something has to run it, and Haxchi only does elfs. In the channel's case it's the system that runs it. It is the title's executable.Great info guys.
So if I right to say that the rpx version is useless? Only the channel version and elf matter?
Also, while rpx does not need elf to launch, besides Haxchi, it still needs the elf or the channel to launch it, as it by itself doesn't launch through the browser from what I understand?
The channel doesn't run the rpx from SD, and like '644 said, it doesn't need the elf at all. It runs it from the title's code directory on NAND or USB, like the other titles run theirs. It'll start fine without an SD if you want to enjoy the bubble background without silly apps getting in the way.The channel version is the RPX converted into an installable format and/or a forwarder. I'm not sure whether it comes off the SD card or not, could really go either way.