The Switch is already exploited. RCM for V1 and Modchip for V2.
What would motivate hackers to keep looking if an easy solution already exists today?
The fact that
neither of the two things you have asserted here are true.
To be fair, that doesn't mean modding a Switch is impossible (already proven false) or that a full software mod is never or ever going to come, it's just you are comparing two (three) different things, apples to pineapples to oranges, and hence some people just won't take the explanations.
> "The Switch is already exploited"
The
Tegra is exploited, and only a specific revision at that, ne that no longer is included into the devices on production. The Switch itself (kernel, OS) has not been touched, so there is still incentive to achieve it because currently you can only reasonably softmod a Switch unit that
has been locked in cold storage since release day.
> "What would motivate hackers to keep looking if an easy solution already exists today?"
Operational word: "easy". Installing a modchip, heck even
getting a modchip, is not currently within the realm of anything that can be called easy. Furthermore, as it is a hardware-level solution that also requires market involvement, it severely limits it to being a solution that is 1.- non-testable (in the scientific falsifiability sense) and 2.- non-reproducible (meaning if something goes wrong you can't rollback and redo).
So, from the perspective of anyone who expects / hopes for the generalist statement "the Switch is hackable" to become
true, there's still justification and motivation to do lots of work. It's just those clash with the current status of reality (eg.: it is *possible* to get the private keys, but not within any timetable that could be considered reasonable, my understanding is it'd currently take ~114 human generations of processing?, and no amount of crying "bUt tHE vITa" is gonna fix that).