An explanation that cores and GHZ don't instantly equal speed in a thread where people are drooling over processors based on their cores and ghz?Antoligy said:@Rydian nice useless copypasta there
An explanation that cores and GHZ don't instantly equal speed in a thread where people are drooling over processors based on their cores and ghz?Antoligy said:@Rydian nice useless copypasta there
Not really. the Core i series of CPU's are from Intel, not AMD; it isn't even based on the amount of cores the CPU has.SamAsh07 said:i8 is in town, or atleast it's going to be.
That's kinda how Intel works.MadClaw said:I'm sure many people will agree, and won't agree with me on this.
But i think it's funny how AMD's current 6core cpu is better than the Intel 6 core and it's $800 cheaper.
Which ones?MadClaw said:I'm sure many people will agree, and won't agree with me on this.
But i think it's funny how AMD's current 6core cpu is better than the Intel 6 core and it's $800 cheaper.
MadClaw said:I'm sure many people will agree, and won't agree with me on this.
But i think it's funny how AMD's current 6core cpu is better than the Intel 6 core and it's $800 cheaper.
The only time when AMD trumped Intel was with K8; this, however, was only due to Intel slumping behind.DSGamer64 said:Still, I think Intel is going to finally get a run for their money, they have been the dominant ones since the Core 2 Duo came out so I think it's time AMD took back their place at the top.