I think he means "why didn't I think of patenting glasses-less 3D and suing Nintendo for truckloads of moneyz?"Joe88 said:becuase it's a typical nintendrone postGameWinner said:Why didn't I think of this!?
I think he means "why didn't I think of patenting glasses-less 3D and suing Nintendo for truckloads of moneyz?"Joe88 said:becuase it's a typical nintendrone postGameWinner said:Why didn't I think of this!?
oh, well I think many people commenting in this thread have no idea how the patent process worksVeho said:I think he means "why didn't I think of patenting glasses-less 3D and suing Nintendo for truckloads of moneyz?"Joe88 said:becuase it's a typical nintendrone postGameWinner said:Why didn't I think of this!?
Atari did the mouse, if I remember correctly, and they thrown it away while Gates and Jobs picked it uptigris said:Amen to this.spinal_cord said:Slyakin said:Nintendo shouldn't be using patented technology. They shouldn't be using any type of stolen ideas either. Nintendo deserves to die if they stole stuff.
You do realise that almost EVERYTHING is a copy of previous items don't you?
Are you saying that no company should have the right to make, say, a waste paper basket because someone ELSE had the idea first? What about that optical mouse you are using on a your computer? I bet is wasn't manufactured by Xerox! If it wasn't for people using 'stolen' ideas, the TV would never have became popular, every day items would not be mass produced on a production line, you wouldn't have Linux or Windows or MacOX. We would still be in the dark ages because caveman1 killed anyone who used his idea to use a rock as a seat.
Chaosruler said:Nintendo are Sharps customers, they bought those screens, as much as you are a Nintendo customer to buy those screen from Nintendo, Nintendo can be sued but not for as-much, It's like saying Optimus 3D customers are sued due to using that same 3D technology
Atari did the mouse, if I remember correctly, and they thrown it away while Gates and Jobs picked it uptigris said:Amen to this.spinal_cord said:Slyakin said:Nintendo shouldn't be using patented technology. They shouldn't be using any type of stolen ideas either. Nintendo deserves to die if they stole stuff.
You do realise that almost EVERYTHING is a copy of previous items don't you?
Are you saying that no company should have the right to make, say, a waste paper basket because someone ELSE had the idea first? What about that optical mouse you are using on a your computer? I bet is wasn't manufactured by Xerox! If it wasn't for people using 'stolen' ideas, the TV would never have became popular, every day items would not be mass produced on a production line, you wouldn't have Linux or Windows or MacOX. We would still be in the dark ages because caveman1 killed anyone who used his idea to use a rock as a seat.
This is a pretty old news article...awssk8er said:Why is this guy waiting until now to try to sue them?....
I doubt he'll win, but if he does... I don't even know what would happen.