Is SNES9x more resource intensive than ZSNES?

Discussion in 'Other Consoles & Oldies' started by jmckutchin, Apr 29, 2012.

  1. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    Hi all,

    I recently acquired a AspireRevo R1600, a little nettop powered by an Atom 230. Definitely not the most powerful thing in the world, but with hardware acceleration it makes a decent streaming PC. My main goal for this nettop, however, was to turn it into a SNES/NES emulator that hooks right up to my TV. Until recently, I've used SNES9x gx on my Wii for my SNES needs, but I would like to be able to run an HQ filter without the frame rate dropping.

    So I've read a couple of things about how SNES9x is typically more accurate (especially the SPC-7000 core) than ZSNES, but whenever I try to put any filter on, the audio starts stuttering. ZSNES used to be my emulator of choice in the wayyyy back when, but I know it hasn't been updated in a while. Still, when I loaded it up it ran the game perfectly with the HQ filter applied.

    I fiddled with SNES9x for at least a half hour, but I just couldn't get it to work right. Is this simply a limitation of this nettop, or am I missing something?
     
  2. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,111
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Yes, it has higher requirements (for a variety of reasons).
     
  3. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    I assumed as much... Currently the nettop only has 1GB of ram, 256MB of which is dedicated to the integrated GPU. I have another 1GB stick on the way, so its final stats will be 1.6 GHZ Atom 230 and 2GB of ram with 512MB dedicated to the GPU. Should I bother trying to get SNES9x working well or just stick with ZSNES and endure a slightly less accurate experience?

    Thanks!

    Edit: Also, now that you mention it, what are some of those reasons? I'm curious to hear your thoughts though I think I may already know why.
     
  4. spinal_cord

    spinal_cord Knows his stuff

    Member
    3,020
    597
    Jul 21, 2007
    somewhere
    You could try a couple of earlier releases os snes9x. It was originally designed to run on windows 95/98, I remember running it on an old 233mhz pentium2. Just remember, you don't need all those fancy gfx filters and the sound quality doesn't really need to be anything above 32k.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    If I didn't want the filters I'd just use snes9x gx :)
     
  6. Midna

    Midna Banned

    Banned
    3,336
    839
    Apr 13, 2008
    Albania
    You have all of my contempt and disapproval. All of it.
    Unless you're just using scanlines
     
  7. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    Somehow, I think I will survive.
     
  8. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,111
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    More RAM won't speed it up if it's CPU-limited.

    Reasons for it being slower?

    It's gotten more accurate, which is more resouece-intensive to emulate. Compare ZSNES's requirements with BSNES (the most accurate emulator, plays everything, but needs a Core 2 Duo for fullspeed). The average hardware level has increased slowly over time, so now the emulator can afford to do things in a heavier (but more correct) way than it used to. Do note that the Atom 230 is around 1/5th to 1/10th the power of most processors nowadays (but it's not like nettops and HTPCs are made for CPU-harsh functions anyways, what with even the atom being able to stream modern video formats when paired with a decent IGP).
     
  9. TwinRetro

    TwinRetro Global Moderator

    Global Moderator
    6,246
    5,069
    Aug 29, 2008
    Djibouti
    Hiatus Hell
    SNES9x still runs great on my Pentium 4, 2.2GHz machine with 512MB RAM.
     
  10. the_randomizer

    the_randomizer The Temp's official fox whisperer

    Member
    22,357
    10,708
    Apr 29, 2011
    United States
    Dr. Wahwee's castle
    Snes9x 1.52 ran fine on my Intel Atom CPU Chromebook (on Linux Unbuntu), albeit with a few adjustments. Snes9x uses Blaarg's SPC700/S-SMP audio emulation core (same as Bsnes), which is spot on with a real SNES as far as accuracy is concerned. Zsnes is dead last in the sound department, so naturally system requirements are higher for Snesx, but not overwhelmingly so. I highly recommend Snes9x over Zsnes any day.
     
  11. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    @Rydian That's pretty much what I assumed, but I had no supporting opinion. As far as being CPU limited, I'm not sure, but it's the obvious bottleneck. I get sound hiccups and the frame rate drops to ~55 fps, but task manager is only reading 60%-80% CPU usage. Ram usage is at about 80-85%. Increasing the ram will also allow me to increase the amount of memory I can dedicate to the GPU (512MB is restricted unless you have 2GB). I've heard outputting in OpenGL will take more advantage of the GPU, but switching from Direct 3D makes it even worse.

    @the_randomizer what adjustments did you use to get it running on your chromebook? and did you have any filters enabled?
     
  12. the_randomizer

    the_randomizer The Temp's official fox whisperer

    Member
    22,357
    10,708
    Apr 29, 2011
    United States
    Dr. Wahwee's castle
    I had to adjust the input frequency to around 31600Hz or so to reduce crackling and install video drivers (which are NOT fun to install on Linux). For filtering, I ust used the most basic bilinear filtering. Even then, it was a real pain to get working, but once I did those, it ran full speed.
     
  13. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    Thanks for the advice. Here's the current situation:

    Running Task Manager, GPU Monitor, and Snes9x in windowed mode while playing Actraiser on hq4x makes the game extremely choppy with fps around 30fps, yet task manager says CPU is maxing out at 80% and GPU load is around 15%. Any thoughts as to what's going on?
     
  14. Coto

    Coto GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,370
    417
    Jun 4, 2010
    Chile
    Because those effects don't happen in GPU, but CPU clocks. (different threads)

    Also, ZSNES for speed. SNES9X compatibility albeit quite slow. I prefer anyway having my Wii hooked through component cables then using a wavebird GC controller to play SNES. It's unique.
     
  15. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    My current setup is my wii using a classic controller pro. And with the headache this has become, it might stay that way...
     
  16. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    Also, is there any way to have those effects processed by the GPU and not the CPU? The GPU on this thing is actually pretty decent.
     
  17. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,111
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Screenshot your display settings in snes9x.
     
  18. jmckutchin
    OP

    jmckutchin GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    222
    16
    Nov 26, 2008
    United States
    Podunk, U.S.A
    At this point all my settings are pretty much default. With vsync and triple buffering enabled the game still hiccups occasionally.
     
  19. raulpica

    raulpica With your drill, thrust to the sky!

    Supervisor
    11,036
    7,349
    Oct 23, 2007
    Italy
    PowerLevel: 9001
    ZSNES is faster because most of it is written in highly-optimized x86 assembly, which is also the reason why it hasn't been ported to any other platform.
     
  20. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,111
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Tried both DirectX and OpenGL render types?