• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Joe Biden is now officially the 46th President of the United States of America

Should this thread be locked?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 64.3%
  • No

    Votes: 15 35.7%

  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
Basis for Embarrassment shouldn't be who and who didn't get the popular vote.

Bernie Sanders didn't get the popular vote for both times Trump ran for president. Elizabeth Warren didn't get the popular vote. Bernie had to drop out. He couldn't even make it to the end, to the election semi finals, something Trump did.

Unless you thinks Bernies policies are horrible. Deserves to drop out, and is therefore an embarrassment.


I think impeachment is a better indicator for embarrassment.
I think both can be indicators for embarrassment. I'd argue being impeached twice is far more embarrassing then an election loss though.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I think that is idealistic thinking, still. Every impeachment in my history had always been politically motivated and on a downward spiral.
Bipartisan majorities in both the House and Senate voted to convict Trump, and when you include the senators like McConnell who probably would have otherwise voted to convict if not for his misguided issues with the constitutionality of the impeachment. It was not politically motivated. It's hard (but not impossible) to argue it was politically motivated when it was after he left office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plasmaster09

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
I think both can be indicators for embarrassment. I'd argue being impeached twice is far more embarrassing then an election loss though.
They can be but it depends on context to.

I've always been for the under dog that has good ideas. Sometimes the under dog doesn't win the popularity contest. Not because they are bad but because of certain circumstances, whether it's because they didn't advertise themselves well enough, or some other situation.

You are not always going to be number 1 winner. Someone with good ideas but fails to win the popular vote is not basis for embarrassment. Someone with bad ideas and looses the popular vote is basis for embarrassment.
 

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
They can be but it depends on context to.

I've always been for the under dog that has good ideas. Sometimes the under dog doesn't win the popularity contest. Not because they are bad but because of certain circumstances, whether it's because they didn't advertise themselves well enough, or some other situation.

You are not always going to be number 1 winner. Someone with good ideas but fails to win the popular vote is not basis for embarrassment. Someone with bad ideas and looses the popular vote is basis for embarrassment.
To be fair, Trump is the only person to lose the popular vote twice in a presidential election. It's pretty embarrassing.
 

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
To be fair, Trump is the only person to lose the popular vote twice in a presidential election. It's pretty embarrassing.
Ya, so did Bernie but I wouldn't call Bernie an embarrassing candidate. He had some interesting ideas. Or any of the other candidates that didn't win president.
 

tabzer

This place is a meme.
Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
5,844
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
4,911
Country
Japan
Success for these people are not based on "embarrassment" holding them back. I mean, the majority of "successful people" have experienced situations which should be embarrassing, by your standard, more than the typical individual tenfold, but they kept trying anyway until they succeeded. It's because they learn to be shameless that they achieve a lucrative political career.

Also, the idea that politics is truly a bipartisan struggle where politicians are fighting for ideology is a fantasy, ignoring reality tv show applied science.

The whole Trump being impeached is embarrassing narrative is rather stupid considering that from the beginning he has posed himself as being against the self-serving machine--so things like impeachment will only fuel that narrative. I'm saying this despite how stupid the actual impeachment was, which makes me suspect that Trump is apart of the puppet show.
 
Last edited by tabzer,

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
He couldn't even make it in the general election. Which should be an embarrassment. But I wouldn't call him an embarrassment.
I wouldn't say the primary elections and the general election are comparable. They don't even have comparable electorates. Biden is also one of many people to have run in a presidential primary and lost. Trump is the only person to ever lose the popular vote twice.
 

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
1. Remove Filibuster in Senate
2. Make Washington DC a State (votes are there)
3. Make Puerto Rico a Sate (votes are there)

Doing this would increase the Senate to 104, plus increase the house ( a rebalance would be nessssary).
These are a great alternative to abolishing the Senate entirely or making it a representative body.
 

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
I wouldn't say the primary elections and the general election are comparable. They don't even have comparable electorates. Biden is also one of many people to have run in a presidential primary and lost. Trump is the only person to ever lose the popular vote twice.
Primaries are a mess. It even led to Democrats creating super delegates because of it. It needs some amending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lacius

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
Primaries are a mess. It even led to Democrats creating super delegates because of it. It needs some amending.
The primaries are a mess.

The Democratic primary should be by popular vote, there should be no caucuses, and states' primary elections should be within the same general timeframe (e.g. March-April). Superdelegates should be eliminated, but they're effectively gone already if a candidate gets a majority of delegates on the first round.
 

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
The primaries are a mess.

The Democratic primary should be by popular vote, there should be no caucuses, and states' primary elections should be within the same general timeframe (e.g. March-April). Superdelegates should be eliminated, but they're effectively gone already if a candidate gets a majority of delegates on the first round.
It's an unessecary complicated process.

At least Bernie Sanders broke Super Delegates in 2016. Next step it to remove it like you said. And Amend the constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lacius

Lacius

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
18,099
Trophies
3
XP
18,338
Country
United States
It's an unessecary complicated process.

At least Bernie Sanders broke Super Delegates in 2016. Next step it to remove it like you said. And Amend the constitution.
Amend the Constitution to do what, get rid of the Electoral College? I agree.

The Democratic Party has almost complete control over how they run their primary elections. They could choose tomorrow not to use delegates and do a popular vote system instead. If they're going to decry the Electoral College, they should show it.
 

Plasmaster09

Social Justice Potato
Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
1,371
Trophies
1
Age
19
Location
somewhere that may or may not exist
XP
2,531
Country
United States
II
Amend the Constitution to do what, get rid of the Electoral College? I agree.

The Democratic Party has complete control over how they run their primary elections. They could choose tomorrow not to use delegates and do a popular vote system instead. If they're going to decry the Electoral College, they should show it.
I mean... the Electoral College exists because the Founders nearly pissed themselves at their newly-found democracy being truly democratic and wanted to avoid all the decisions actually being made based on the will of the people, so trashing it is a pretty obvious thing to do.
Repeat after me
not happening
Well, the DC one isn't.
However, Puerto Rico absolutely deserves statehood, and the Republicans are likely to abuse the filibuster to kingdom come in order to wall Biden from doing anything.
(And a nice fringe benefit of PR statehood is that the Senate would actually total a multiple of three, so annoying two-thirds-required decisions are easier to figure out!)
 
Last edited by Plasmaster09,

SG854

Hail Mary
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
5,215
Trophies
1
Location
N/A
XP
8,104
Country
Congo, Republic of the
II
I mean... the Electoral College exists because the Founders nearly pissed themselves at their newly-found democracy being truly democratic and wanted to avoid all the decisions actually being made based on the will of the people, so trashing it is a pretty obvious thing to do.

Well, the DC one isn't.
However, Puerto Rico absolutely deserves statehood, and the Republicans are likely to abuse the filibuster to kingdom come in order to wall Biden from doing anything.
(And a nice fringe benefit of PR statehood is that the Senate would actually total a multiple of three, so annoying two-thirds-required decisions are easier to figure out!)
Electoral College is a product of its time. When information had to be sent via horses. There was no instant messages passed online. You are judging based on your privileges of today.

It's outdated in today's world and needs some changing.
 

KingVamp

Haaah-hahahaha!
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
13,505
Trophies
2
Location
Netherworld
XP
7,988
Country
United States
2. Make Washington DC a State (votes are there)
3. Make Puerto Rico a Sate (votes are there)

Doing this would increase the Senate to 104
Just waiting for all the "New 52" jokes, if these get passed.

plus increase the house ( a rebalance would be nessssary).
I'm in favor of the Wyoming rule.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    realtimesave @ realtimesave: @SylverReZ anything new in gaming?