I can't just accept your anecdote as a universal truth, I'm very sorry. The simple fact remains that circumcision requires separation of skin from the body, it is a surgical procedure and carries risk, no matter how small.
View attachment 137589
less than a minute , no surgery , so uniformed yet so opinionated.
hurts more and takes longer to remove a wart.
im done , youre all out to believe the worst and havent seen shit in real life, yet your opinion is supposed to make some dramatic point
What's this obsession of "less cleaning" y'all have? We aren't talking about a one-room apartment, it's your body. You should always keep it clean. A small piece of skin doesn't slow you down for one hour lol
You're right that it falls off if they use the tie it off method. But they do definitely cut it as well (there's different methods). And the tool you linked is used for both. The tie it off method also takes 6-12 days though, not mere minutes.
I gotta watch the video now. I always knew that circumcision was used to suppress male sexuality, masturbation is bad belief. If this is true then wouldn't that put it on par with Middle East Female Genital Mutilation used to suppress female sexuality. Over there women have the belief thats it's better for them and are kept ignorant about negative effects. Then wouldn't the same be applied with male circumcision that males are kept ignorant about the negatives and think its for the better or is no big deal. People say that FGM is a form of female oppression then wouldn't the same be true that Circumcision is a form of male oppression if they are identical. I personally wouldn't consider it oppression though but if it does have huge negative effects then maybe?
Even if the process is painless there are no good reasons to mutilate an infant's genitals. You permanently mess them up.
I mentioned this in a previous post, but that is true
but there are no european countries with the name "europe" as the name of the country, so it's a bit harder than just that.
Even then you still have to accept the assertion that the skin somehow just peels away without any trauma. Anybody who was intact could tell at a glance that it's not possible.
https://www.medicinenet.com/circumcision_-_does_it_prevent_hiv_and__aids/ask.htm#
I like that the clinical trials cited as justification are performed in sub-saharan Africa, the HIV capital of the world, rather than the United States. This kind of disingenuous use of statistics really gets my back up.
That comes off as saying a malaria pills trial results are “disingenuous” because they were tried in Vietnam. Not really sure what your point is here tbh.
It's not the same situation for a start. A malaria pill is designed to be used in an environment where the risk of contracting malaria is prevalent and is the best method of doing so, hence why Malaria pills are not used in environments where they are unnecessary. Whereas in this case, data citing circumcision trials from African nations, where the risk of contracting disease is orders of magnitude higher, is being applied in a different environment. Not only is the risk of infection from unprotected sex alone significantly lower in developed nations, you need only see the comparable infection rates, to the United States, of western European nations where circumcision isn't a common practice to see that the procedure has negligible impact on the infection rates of a developed nation.
Again, this makes no sense. If it’s shown to reduce risk in a high infection rate area, why would it not reduce risk in lower rate areas? It doesn’t matter what the infection rate is. On top of that, there were case studies showing evidence of defense against other diseases. Imo a lot of people here come across like they have an ax to grind for whatever reason. Religion seems to be the most likely. Another outrage flavor of the month.
That's just the thing, in an area of low risk of infection your circumcized penis isn't going to benefit you at all. The risk isn't there that requires it. Even in the studies themselves, the risk of infection to circumcized patients is still a lousy coin flip and has more to do with how you take care of yourself than having a foreskin. In the highest risk area on the planet it is all but ineffectual, in the lowest risk area on the planet it is unnecessary.
Protect yourself!What if I wanna go smash some hookers in Bangkok tho?
@
CameronCataclysm:
@
Xdqwerty:
@
Xdqwerty:
