Well this is good. Sure at this point it will just come off as a complete rip but at least with the Wii U you don't need to buy two consoles to make it happen.
Doesn't this sound familiar.... oh ya the PS3 and PSP did this and no one used it.
Because gamers ALWAYS COMPLAIN ABOUT ANY SHIT! Be it positive or negative. Hell the day gamers will stop complaining, it'll be the end of the world.I am really having a hard time trying to understand why people are complaining for a free extra feature.
If you don't want remote play, don't use it. Simple as that.
I am pretty sure there won't be a game for ps4 which you can't play because of not having a vita.
that way you don't have to have a Wii U for some off-tv gaming, nice move Sony, but always a step behind Nintendo, but I'm happy, I plan to buy a PS4 at launch.
they should just scrap their controller and pack-in a vita with each ps4.
-another world
but with one of these you still need a screen of some sort, I was talking about a experience very similar to off-tv the Wii U already offers.http://www.maplin.co.uk/wireless-hdmi-video-sender-kit-503801 and related stuff is not a terribly new concept.
they should just scrap their controller and pack-in a vita with each ps4.
-another world
Weird that the Wii U game pad is a bad idea but this is such a great idea.
The Wii U threads are leaking, I see.
Comparing remote play to the Wii U tablet is like comparing the Wii U tablet to the GameCube/Game Boy functionality. There are some superficial similarities, sure, but on the whole they vary considerably.
But hey, can't let pesky facts or context get in the way, right?
but with one of these you still need a screen of some sort, I was talking about a experience very similar to off-tv the Wii U already offers.
and thinking about that, they really need to make games that uses PS4+Vita a-la Wii U, was the intention they had since the beginning with all this, rip-off Nintendo and the Wii U.
I don't see anyone saying that the WiiU off screen play is bad, but due note that the Remote Play for the PS3/PSP has been around longer than the WiiU. While the usability of the PSP/PS3 was limited, the newer hardware should be able to do the thing better..Weird that the Wii U game pad is a bad idea but this is such a great idea.
I have a Wii U. I have a Ps3 and a PSP. I know how remote play works for that and I understand how this will work. There are enough similarities to compare the two. That and all the posts about how stupid or what a bad idea the game pad gives me a valid point.
Then again, I expected you would probably troll another post of mine with a nice analysis of it. The way you jock my balls here, I feel like you might have a crush on me. Funny, considering I'm not at all impressed with any of your cynical spam comments.
"I have a valid point. I won't say what makes it valid, or justify it in any way, but I'll say just insist it's valid and that's that. You better believe it."
There's a whole plethora of differences between the two. Remote play is entirely peripheral for the user; the Wii U tablet controller is the defining feature of the console, what it's entirely built around. Remote play is simply used to play the game remotely (well, duh); the Wii U tablet can do this, yes, but its touchscreen can also be used to control the game or to provide extra information (HUD, minimaps, etc.) to the game played on the television. I'd go on about the physical differences between the handheld Vita and the Wii U's tablet, but that should be pretty self-evident.
Needless to say, there's a considerable number of differences between the two. You're trying to compare an apple to an orange-colored monster truck here - it's just not going to work no matter how much you insist otherwise.
Please, don't flatter yourself. I'm saving myself for Channing Tatum (More like Channing Bait-em, am I right, ladies?).
Seriously, though, are you so desperate for comebacks that you're turning to the, "You're just gay!" line of thinking? Really? And what, anyone who disagrees with you and shares their opinion is now just spamming?
Tsk, tsk. I think you have some growing up to do, buddy.
I'm grown enough and we're not buddies.
I have no idea if your gay. Nor do I care what your personal preferences are. I'm just working with what you're giving me. The thing is, I don't post much on here. Yet, about 70% of my posts have been quoted and cynically criticized by you. You seem to make a point to disagree with everything I post. Whereas, I don't care about your opinions or your snide remarks. You think it's okay to disrespect people as long as you do it in a clever way or make an intelligent reference to theological works . I'm smart enough to realize that no matter what you post on the internet there is going to be somebody somewhere that disagrees with you. Here on this site that person happens to be you, constantly. I don't mind being disagreed with and have been disagreed with quite civilly on a few occasions. But I get it, that's your MO. You need to have some couth.
My comparison makes sense. No matter how much you try to convince everyone that it doesn't with irrelevant banter just because you don't like it.