This woman pretty much says it all. These people just want you dead. pic.twitter.com/ZjTZ0gLJzc
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 18, 2020
This woman pretty much says it all. These people just want you dead. pic.twitter.com/ZjTZ0gLJzc
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 18, 2020
Nothing I said about the tapes is false, anyone with two ears can listen to said tapes and verify that - in fact, just one will do, so I consider that subject over. All disease estimates are revised over time, you don't know if the new counts are more or less accurate, and have no evidence to support your conspiracy theory.You made false statements about Trump and the tapes. I corrected it. If you have an issue, address it specifically. I intentionally bypassed the conversion you were having to correct specific misinformation.
We know for a fact that Michael Caputo tried to "change, delay, suppress, and retroactively edit scientific reports on COVID-19 by the Centers for Disease Control that were deemed to contradict or undermine what Trump was saying publicly."
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/...nterfered-with-cdc-reports-on-covid-19-412809
y'all make biden's platform sound way cooler than it isLet's hope Trump will win. Often, it doesn't really matter who wins, as little really changes. But for the first time, I truly fear what will will happen to society should Biden win.
From the moment Trump won in 2016, the democrats have been going more extreme by the day. Society already has come to the point, where making a positive comment about Trump labels you as a racist, and can get you into trouble or fired. That's no longer a democracy. It suprised me how far it even goes. News stationststations twist newsor makes it up, college professors who manipulate the youth...
For example Covid-19, remember how the world bashed Trump when he restricted travel from Europe back in March. Canada even promoted Europeans were more than welcome there. Not even a month after that, everyone was yelling why Trump didn't close the borders... And there are dozen of events just like that.
The greatest danger in today's society, is extreme left ideology.
However, politics make people blind. You have your preference and magnify all bad of the others, and minimize the errors of those you support. But I think in all objectivity, noone can say Trump has been bad for America.
"I'm not Trump and I forgot my message - Dementia-Harris 2020"y'all make biden's platform sound way cooler than it is
Foxi hit on my objection to it. If Harris were the nominee I'm sure many of the Biden supporters would vote for her. What I find objectionable is putting someone more palatable and viable on the ballot only to have him be replaced by a candidate with very little support. That isn't very democratic.I know what happened. That was her vs other democrats. What I doubt, is suddenly everyone would have changed their mind about Trump, if was only her vs Trump.
You hurt my feelings. #BotLivesMatterI'm also done with a moderator spuring on insane theories here. Can we get Foxi4 replaced in this forum please - or is this part of the russian trolling initiative thats mandatory for this forum?
I never mentioned disease counts. I'm talking about Trump's lies. I listed them. Feel free to address which ones aren't lies.Nothing I said about the tapes is false, anyone with two ears can listen to said tapes and verify that - in fact, just one will do, so I consider that subject over. All disease estimates are revised over time, you don't know if the new counts are more or less accurate, and have no evidence to support your conspiracy theory.
Nothing personal, but it's hypocritical to mass-delete posts in a thread because "our site doesn't deal in conspiracy theories" before spouting conspiracy theories (Biden-Harris conspiracy theories) that are just as nonsensical.Seems to me like you have plenty of freedom to express your (negative) opinion of me. Don't worry, there's a full record of all moderation actions taken against you, including the deletion of off-topic spam and double-posting. Every member has a right to ask another moderator or supervisor for a second opinion, and you're welcome to use that right - I'm certainly not going to stop you. Now, I'd suggest that you return to the topic at hand since last I checked, I wasn't running for the office of U.S. President - sadly I'm not eligible, although I'd probably make a good one. For more information please follow the link below:
https://gbatemp.net/help/terms
The section on General Forum Decency is of particular interest to you, it outlines how you should complain and which rule you're breaking at this very moment. I'll wink and nod though, since I am feeling mighty generous today.
In that case let me post a clarification - Harris should receive additional scrutiny due to Biden's age. It's pretty basic risk assessment that was no doubt a subject of discussion during the Democratic convention. I hope you find that response to be satisfactory.Nothing personal, but it's hypocritical to mass-delete posts in a thread because "our site doesn't deal in conspiracy theories" before spouting conspiracy theories (Biden-Harris conspiracy theories) that are just as nonsensical.
It's one thing to say Harris should receive extra scrutiny because of Biden's age (she should). It's one thing to say Harris has a likelier than average chance of replacing Biden because of his age (she does). It's another thing to say Harris' replacement of Biden is something the DNC or some other group is specifically planning for after the election, and it happening circumstantially is an illusion. If I've misrepresented your conspiracy theory, please correct me, but that's the bullshit we are perceiving you to be hypocritically spewing.
Did we misinterpret your previous statements, are you recanting your previous statements, or neither?In that case let me post a clarification - Harris should receive additional scrutiny due to Biden's age. It's pretty basic risk assessment that was no doubt a subject of discussion during the Democratic convention. I hope you find that response to be satisfactory.
Sorry is that a sentence, or are you enjoying the green fairy again?Anyway not really sure what I want to look at for this one. Health of rich elderly pocket liners and legacy chasers of dubious moral character, and possibly intellectual fortitude, and almost certainly without a set of core values/principles, all for a fairly meaningless role in the grand scheme of things.
Baby, I was born this way.Aw and Foxi4 gets another in the hate thread/pissed someone off seriously enough to call for removal column before I get a single one. Going to have to try harder it seems.
I haven't sincerely recanted a statement once in my entire life, never needed to, so pick whichever one pleases you more, really. I know what I meant when I said it - given all the circumstances at hand and the probability involved I think it would be crazy for convention-goers to not consider that as a plausible, or even a likely scenario. It's priced into the package from the get-go, so I suppose it's "planned" in the sense that it is accounted for. If you don't like that phrasing, that's fine, we'll call it "concern in regards to Biden's age" and leave it at that. I don't think it's fair for the voters and I can only hope that people will have this in mind at the ballot box. I can't possibly imagine Biden serving the customary two terms, as most of the presidents in recent years - he'd have to be a one-term guy, if that. That alone makes him an odd candidate to nominate, but then again, I'm not a Democrat, so I may have different priorities.Did we misinterpret your previous statements, are you recanting your previous statements, or neither?
Sorry is that a sentence, or are you enjoying the green fairy again?
Poetry class in the middle of an argument? That had nothing to do with
- health of rich elderly pocket liners
- legacy chasers of dubious moral character
- legacy chasers of dubious intellectual fortitude
- people without a set of core values/principles mistreating anyone here in here
This was simply a user - probably out of sheer hatred towards the inkling of the idea, that a women could become president (?), by the presidential candidate dying in the future, or at least playing with that prejudice, mentioning this as their main motivations not to vote for one of the candidates. And a freaking moderator liking that statement.
There is no, absolutely no, indication anywhere, that a career driven Kamala Harris, who is mostly progressive by image, not action - would "ruin" the US in that instance. Which if the statement wasnt misogynistic, would be the only other explanation - tacked on to the idea, no the CHANNELING of a person dying in the next four years should prevent anyone from
a. voting
b. voting Biden
The entire setup is cruel, crude, a little disturbed, a quite a lot misanthropic, likely propagating a freaking meme, showing no undestanding whatsoever about what the presidency is, or how US politics work, or what voteing is....
So naturally - a moderator here had to like it, and you had to dedicate a poem to it.
Stop it.
Out of curiosity, if Trump wins, but something happens to him, are you fine with Pence becoming president?Foxi hit on my objection to it. If Harris were the nominee I'm sure many of the Biden supporters would vote for her. What I find objectionable is putting someone more palatable and viable on the ballot only to have him be replaced by a candidate with very little support. That isn't very democratic.