Is what Phoenix tells you, when you update or connect to internet the versionlist gets updated, basically is telling you there's a newer update than what you are using, not that you need to update the firmware.@JRoad used one of your earlier builds (few months ago) to patch it with update and dlc, game loaded fine. Now it's asking to update. The only difference is since have updated switch from 5.0.1 to 8.0.1
Any idea why this is the case?
Selfmade nsps\xcis shouldn't be able to verify. Only readability and maybe hash since it keeps 2 of them, and well since hacpack makes weird headers the readability check (level1) can fail easily. Unless i'm missunderstanding you about the correct nca thing, if you mean you made a nsp with unmodified ncas for some reason, i you didn't add a ticket the xci should be bad, but again i don't know if that's what you mean.VERIFY hash of files isn't working in the newest version for my selfmade NSP.
After pressing "1" an errorline appears for a short sec, then I'm back in the menu.
It still works fine with 0.89.
I don't know the error message, because CLS everywhere.
I wouldn't use CLS anywhere, infos going lost with.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Another thing:
If I check my selfmade NSP, the file check results in correct NSP including only correct NCAs.
But if I build a XCI out of it, VERIFY hash of files gives only "corrupt" for all NCAs. WHY ???
Is what Phoenix tells you, when you update or connect to internet the versionlist gets updated, basically is telling you there's a newer update than what you are using, not that you need to update the firmware.
I know blawar added to tinfoil.io the reset update requirement, if it works as it does with devmenu it should be able to overwrite the value in the versionlist and delete the nag.
I talking about the file info, where I can see the exefs data.Hi,
How can I get the gui part working? I want to see the build ID.
thanks
Maybe it's a stupid question: is it possible to merge a nsp and an update for that nsp. And by "merge", I mean get one nsp with the update "applied" to the game ? Not two nsp merged into one.
On the switch itself.Version list is on the switch or game? Anyway rebuilt with newer version and no nag now.
I'll see if I can add a config for non standard chromium browsers. Currently is either chrome\chromium or Chromium portable\slimjet portable in ztools\Chromium as the readme says.I talking about the file info, where I can see the exefs data.
my browser is Maxthon, is that the problem?
thanks
Yes but I didn't implement it. You need to merge the romfs and Exefs and generate a nca from that. Is pretty much doable but it may give issues when you update the game.Maybe it's a stupid question: is it possible to merge a nsp and an update for that nsp. And by "merge", I mean get one nsp with the update "applied" to the game ? Not two nsp merged into one.
I think he means merging the update and base program nca which gets you a smaller one, something I didn't add.That’s what this does merge base, update and dlc into one so when u install or mount the merge file its all done already
Yes but I didn't implement it. You need to merge the romfs and Exefs and generate a nca from that. Is pretty much doable but it may give issues when you update the game.
I think he means merging the update and base program nca which gets you a smaller one, something I didn't add.
OMG, I wait for that. Please hurryYes but I didn't implement it. You need to merge the romfs and Exefs and generate a nca from that. Is pretty much doable but it may give issues when you update the game.That’s what this does merge base, update and dlc into one so when u install or mount the merge file its all done already
You mean compress? Yes since several versions ago, what i added now is pararell compression that allows to compress several files at the same time, when you have enough disk space and a good computer cpu it's a better solution than threads in my opinion.Can you convert NSPs to NSZs with this yet?
Tell me the file if you can and send me the log with hash verification. I don't remember touching the verification though.I have a issue with the "d" version: the verification of the same "nsp" with the "d" version gives me a corruption, with the previous version "c" instead it is correct
Sorry the nsp it was no good!Tell me the file if you can and send me the log with hash verification. I don't remember touching the verification though.