• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

North Korea and Trump

the_randomizer

The Temp's official fox whisperer
Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
31,284
Trophies
2
Age
38
Location
Dr. Wahwee's castle
XP
18,969
Country
United States
There is no 'solution'.

So you'd rather let the little despot douche get his way while other nations give in to sycophancy and "refuse" to do anything about it? You would rather he threaten, and actually use a nuclear weapon before others step up to the plate? Sure sounds like it to me.
 

barronwaffles

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
344
Trophies
0
XP
1,150
Country
Syria
So you'd rather let the little despot douche get his way while other nations give in to sycophancy and "refuse" to do anything about it? You would rather he threaten, and actually use a nuclear weapon before others step up to the plate? Sure sounds like it to me.

Because fuck a few million Asians, right? Who cares.

How do you think a country who was nothing but a pawn in a post WW2 power-play - millions dying in the process - is supposed to behave in a world that's almost unanimously hostile towards it?
 
Last edited by barronwaffles,

gman666

Cubicle Expert
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
381
Trophies
0
Location
a cubicle
XP
1,001
Country
United States
Because fuck a few million Asians, right? Who cares.

How do you think a country who was nothing but a pawn in a post WW2 power-play - millions dying in the process - is supposed to behave in a word that's almost unanimously hostile towards it?
Alright but what are you proposing? Should the U.S. be lenient on a nation that threatens its people?
 

barronwaffles

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
344
Trophies
0
XP
1,150
Country
Syria
Alright but what are you proposing? Should the U.S. be lenient on a nation that threatens its people?

I have absolutely no issues with the majority of Americans - but the track record the United States government internationally over the past 60+ years makes the proposition of it being a moral beacon fighting human rights abuses laughable at best.

China (possibly with Russian cooperation) is likely the only power who can resolve this peacefully.
 
Last edited by barronwaffles,

gman666

Cubicle Expert
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
381
Trophies
0
Location
a cubicle
XP
1,001
Country
United States
I'm have absolutely no issues with the majority of Americans - but the track record the United States government internationally over the past 60+ years makes the proposition of it being a moral beacon fighting human rights abuses laughable at best.

China (possibly with Russian cooperation) is likely the only power who can resolve this peacefully.
I knew you were hiding something in your arguments and now it's revealed that you indeed have hangups about the U.S.. I respect your opinions and I think a solution like that could potentially work, but I doubt U.S. leaders will support a plan like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barronwaffles

barronwaffles

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
344
Trophies
0
XP
1,150
Country
Syria
I knew you were hiding something in your arguments and now it's revealed that you indeed have hangups about the U.S.. I respect your opinions and I think a solution like that could potentially work, but I doubt U.S. leaders will support a plan like this.

I wouldn't paint it as broad as 'the U.S.' - the country is incredibly complex. I have issues with areas that I imagine many *normal* Americans (i.e not generic flag burning morons) have with their own government.
These issues aren't exclusive to the U.S. either - I despise them in my own government.
 

sarkwalvein

There's hope for a Xenosaga port.
Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
8,519
Trophies
2
Age
41
Location
Niedersachsen
XP
11,275
Country
Germany
Unfortunately I haven't been able to find a bunker.
But you know, it may be a once in a lifetime spectacle, so better to watch it with your own eyes under the blue sky.
I have my popcorn, so I am ready for the fireworks.
And there we go, I hope it ends up as exciting as in Fallout. /s
 

Youkai

Demon
OP
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
2,552
Trophies
1
Age
36
Location
Germany , NRW
XP
2,445
Country
Germany
If you wait any longer there will be many dead people as well especially with these sanctions that are getting worse and worse.
Do you think Kim cares about this ? he will still get whatever he needs to eat and drink while the poor people will die a slow and cruelsome death.

So it is either kill Kim and "hope" that there won't be another leader or a better one OR wait till he has more and more power and actually kills lots of Americans or South Koreans or whatever (plus all the ones dying in north korea trough starvation or in these labor camps)
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
1,726
Trophies
1
Location
Seattle, WA
Website
harshamohite.com
XP
3,135
Country
United States
Nothing will happen. Despite the show he puts on, Kim isn't stupid. He knows what mutually-assured destruction is, and he's fully aware that if he attacks the US just once, his little country is gonna be obliterated off the face of the planet. I feel his aggressive behavior is just a ploy in order to assert dominance and increase his regime's legitimacy.

As for Trump's comments to North Korea, I don't know what kind of diplomatic effect it will have, but I'm satisfied. Stick it to 'em. I am very doubtful a war will break out at all. Again, Kim isn't that stupid. So it's a good thing we have a stronger stance against them. But really, at the end of the day, Kim knows not to fuck with the US. We'd reduce Pyongyang to rubble in an afternoon.
 

barronwaffles

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
344
Trophies
0
XP
1,150
Country
Syria
If you wait any longer there will be many dead people as well especially with these sanctions that are getting worse and worse.
Do you think Kim cares about this ? he will still get whatever he needs to eat and drink while the poor people will die a slow and cruelsome death.

So it is either kill Kim and "hope" that there won't be another leader or a better one OR wait till he has more and more power and actually kills lots of Americans or South Koreans or whatever (plus all the ones dying in north korea trough starvation or in these labor camps)

You kill Kim and Seoul is wiped from the map within hours, then the entire peninsula is set on fire.
 

Clydefrosch

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
6,025
Trophies
2
XP
4,642
Country
Germany
how about you look into the history of the koreas and the history of our most recent wars and check possible repercussions before you just go 'why not attack a country?'

even at this point, attacking korea 'just like that' is akin to attacking china. no matter how much korea threatens to use its new weapon, that is, technically, a dick move, but without an official declaration of war, not really forbidden

everytime the world threatens NK, NK gets more frantic to finish its nuclear capabilities. because the dear leader banks on it to be the thing that stops the sanctions and such. because you dont just sanction a nation with 'the bomb' and despite the leadership obviously being undemocratic and cruel, its somewhat of an understandable move.

no matter which way, you cant just 'solve' NK.
i mean, you could have proposed to gift them a dummy attack. you know, they fire a missle into the sky, tell their people the us was wiped out and start some secret trade relations on the grounds that the population gets fed and gulags being closed. and in a few decades, this would've all blown over.


what trumps going for right now is so ridiculously transparent, he's trying to bush iraq war his way out of low ratings and he's absolutely accepting NK just annihilating the south and parts of japan in a last glorious display of power. NK with a nuke is no more dangerous than NK without a nuke, at least to the us.

and with hindsight in mind, the whole thing would have required the rest of the world to act as the bigger man years ago, kiss the old mans feet and try to influence the next generation of leader-gods into being better than their parents
 
  • Like
Reactions: hobbledehoy899

urherenow

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
4,810
Trophies
2
Age
48
Location
Japan
XP
3,717
Country
United States
No, we establish sanctions that make them hurt and we highlight human rights violations as a reason for any further actions we take... Military action should be our last option.
We've been trying that since before you were born, you imbecile. That has led us to the current situation.
 

AmandaRose

Do what I do. Hold tight and pretend it’s a plan
Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
10,199
Trophies
1
Location
Glasgow
Website
www.rockstarnorth.com
XP
16,198
Country
United Kingdom
What we basically have is a leader who is hated in every country around the world apart from his own. A leader who also has a mad haircut. A leader who likes to try and control the people of his own country and has them all fooled into believing he is the greatest. A leader who says and does whatever the fuck he wants. A leader who is way out of control and will probably be the cause of world war 3 starting. A leader who brutally tries to shut down anyone apposed to his views. And people are worried about North Korea when all of the above not only describes Kim Jong-un but also describes Donald Trump.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's a DS Lite in a slightly bigger DS Lite shell.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It's not a Nintendo / iQue official product, it's a 3rd party custom.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite
    for people with beefy hands.
    +1
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I have yaoi anime hands, very lorge but slender.
  • Jayro @ Jayro:
    I'm Slenderman.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I have hands.
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    imagine not having hands, cringe
    +1
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    ESPECIALLY for things I do to myself :sad:.. :tpi::rofl2: Or others :shy::blush::evil:
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @SylverReZ if you could find a v5 DS ML you would have the best of both worlds since the v5 units had the same backlight brightness levels as the DS Lite unlockable with flashme
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that's a long shot
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think only the red mario kart edition phat was v5
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    A woman with no arms and no legs was sitting on a beach. A man comes along and the woman says, "I've never been hugged before." So the man feels bad and hugs her. She says "Well i've also never been kissed before." So he gives her a kiss on the cheek. She says "Well I've also never been fucked before." So the man picks her up, and throws her in the ocean and says "Now you're fucked."
    +2
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    lmao
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    anyways, we need to re-normalize physical media

    if i didn't want my games to be permanent, then i'd rent them
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Agreed, that why I try to buy all my games on disc, Xbox anyways. Switch games (which I pirate tbh) don't matter much, I stay offline 24/7 anyways.
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    I don't pirate them, I Use Them :mellow:. Like I do @BigOnYa 's couch :tpi::evil::rofl2:
    +1
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @BakerMan - you can still "own" digital media, arguably easier and better than physical since you can make copies and backups, as much as you like.

    The issue is DRM
  • cearp @ cearp:
    You can buy drm free games / music / ebooks, and if you keep backups of your data (like documents and family photos etc), then you shouldn't lose the game. but with a disk, your toddler could put it in the toaster and there goes your $60

    :rofl2:
  • cearp @ cearp:
    still, I agree physical media is nice to have. just pointing out the issue is drm
  • rqkaiju2 @ rqkaiju2:
    i like physical media because it actually feels like you own it. thats why i plan on burning music to cds
  • cearp @ cearp:
    It's nice to not have to have a lot of physical things though, saves space
    +1
    cearp @ cearp: It's nice to not have to have a lot of physical things though, saves space +1