How about looking into how all of those type of 'attractors' are constructed?
- They
(unspecified - in the passive, which is not a negative, I use that stuff often myself - but it makes it harder to pin down or go against -- also, it lets people fill in the blanks with something they themselves construct.
Meaning in this configuration, this is basically emotional bait for 'I knew something is going wrong all along' -- where everyone can fill in their personal version of worry, resentment, ... - so its highly compatible with many groups of people feeling neglected.
- are taking away
(again, mostly unspecified - but thats what 'they' always do)
- something that makes me proud or secure.
(or believe in myself, or 'being a man', ...)
So those three elements hook straight into - fear, followed by worries (because its so non distinct - you cant simply find out much about the issue, if you dont go into relative vs. absolute statistics - which most people wont do), followed by insta rage.
Also if you are on the lookout for that pattern, you can see it everywhere.
They, are only giving young people, the vaccine that only protects at a 70% successrate (relative statistics (so not sampled against an 'absolute' ('70% of the people vaccinated') - but against a random sample, and then applying 70% to the caseload of people getting infected in that sample)). With the first shot. (Leaving out, that that never mattered that much, because for all vaccines you are given two shots this time around to hike up the immune response).
And once you see it everywhere, for some reason you are likely to try construct 'the stork brings the babies' (because historically there were always many storks around, that people noticed, when communities had the highest influx of newborns) stories, because they are whats most compatible with your experience (you go out of the door, you see a stork). Which we talk about as 'correlation is not causation'.
At which point we could end and say that thats, bad - and you shouldnt do that. But its also all that machine learning is aimed at producing currently.
But it helps to know, that 'going for, and finding those patterns' isnt an exact 'science'. As in - its interesting, but its probably not useful.
The issue part comes in, when you are starting to congregate people around those stories of fear against 'the largely unknown'. People will then invent their own stories just to have explanations to be able to fill in (the uncertainty). Because uncertainty - is something the human mind doesnt like to deal with. And you made them worry, so they are dealing with it.
If you go after the racially charged conspiracy theories behind that (usually connected to 'they (overlords
) - are reducing - us (the ingroup) - so we become less important than them (the outgroup)).
Thats a pattern frequently found in cults. Not that you should look that strain up necessarily, but its a form of retaining control over a group.
The entire thing is easily debunked, by a simple truism like 'numbers dont always matter' - in terms of if you and your friends will matter, or not.
But its those strangely formless worries, mostly as a result of change thats seen as negative - that births those stories.
Imho. So tell them, if you are worried about a thing - but looking out for them to tell them in bulk, may not be that helpful. Because a part of that is also how humans work, and just a logical fallacy. Except when its not.
Many stories around that concept as well.
(The boy who cried wolf, Cassandra, ...
)