That plan failedWhat do people do if they think they live in the proximity of a deadly new virus? They move out, spreading it. The Chinese government wanted to contain the spread while working on the problem.
That plan failedWhat do people do if they think they live in the proximity of a deadly new virus? They move out, spreading it. The Chinese government wanted to contain the spread while working on the problem.
I am not convinced there was a coverup, but it is definitely a possibility. Regardless, the virus was likely a natural occurrence.You are right about the cover up
It was weird that for 1 yr the WHO wasn't allowed in the Wuhan labs to investigate anything.
It's also weird that they were ruling out a lab leak as a possibility before they even did an investigation in the lab.
And do you think the CCP will tell the WHO the truth? There has been times when they tried to do an investigation and the ccp would always try to divert attention to something else. Like sending them to museums instead of the lab. Museums that talks about the ccp's success stories.
Also the Who said, after an investigation by Chinese authorities there is no clear evidence of Human to Human transmission of the novel corona virus, back in January of 2020.
https://mobile.twitter.com/who/status/1217043229427761152
In January 1st the Chinese government arrested 8 people for talking about the virus. The government said it was to Crack down on rumors. But the rumors they were being punished for were that the virus existed and that it can infect people.
In January 14 Media that reported the cases in Wuhan were arrested and had their cameras searched for any information about the disease.
Chinese Gov. were clearly trying to cover it up.
Stopping the spread? While having a Banquet of over 100,000 people, where they all ate from the same dishes, 3 miles from where the virus was confirmed to come from, in January 18 2020. This banquet was held 2 days after 49 cases have been made public. Also days after, since Jan 1st, Chinse Gov. had been shutting people down from spreading *rumors* about a new pneumonia virus.What do people do if they think they live in the proximity of a deadly new virus? They move out, spreading it. The Chinese government wanted to contain the spread while working on the problem. There is elitism and China and Western countries (like Fauci telling the US population that masks do not work so that people do not horde them).
I cannot verify the claim about the banquet (100k people eating from the same dishes seems like a new level of cooking mastery), however, in January they did not know for sure how the virus spreads (human to human, airborne) and how deadly it is (turns out not as deadly).Stopping the spread? While having a Banquet of over 100,000 people, where they all ate from the same dishes, 3 miles from where the virus was confirmed to come from, in January 18 2020. This banquet was held 2 days after 49 cases have been made public. Also days after, since Jan 1st, Chinse Gov. had been shutting people down from spreading *rumors* about a new pneumonia virus.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...s-over-response-to-viral-outbreak-11579825832
It's right there in the WSJ article. More then 10k families. About 100k people. Sharing dishes.I cannot verify the claim about the banquet (100k people eating from the same dishes seems like a new level of cooking mastery), however, in January they did not know for sure how the virus spreads (human to human, airborne) and how deadly it is (turns out not as deadly).
Cancelling the banquet would have made sense if they had found a good excuse (otherwise: panic).
In the end China has done much more to stop the spread within their country (harsh lockdowns) and abroad (vaccines) than any other country in the world.
You were saying they were hiding the virus because they didn't want people to panic leave and spread it, but people had already left and people freely had celebrations without any knowledge about the existence of the virus. The plan to hide the virus to not cause panic backfired.I cannot verify the claim about the banquet (100k people eating from the same dishes seems like a new level of cooking mastery), however, in January they did not know for sure how the virus spreads (human to human, airborne) and how deadly it is (turns out not as deadly).
Cancelling the banquet would have made sense if they had found a good excuse (otherwise: panic).
In the end China has done much more to stop the spread within their country (harsh lockdowns) and abroad (vaccines) than any other country in the world.
What we dont have is the entire chain of development. So we dont have the specific mutation where it jumped to humans, so you have the part "originated in an animal probably bats" (because you see the "mutation history" specific to their (or a very similar hosts) bodies in the "code"), and then you have a fully formed version with mutations that was able to jump over to humans. You also have a few maybe intermediates, but it isnt a complete chain of evidence. So what we are missing is either the variant that developed in an intermediary host, or early versions that developed in humans (not in Wuhan, we didnt find them there), for full chain of evidence.None of this is remotely true. There's no evidence the virus was human-created, and there is genetic evidence the virus began in bats.
As for me being vaccinated I'm actually trans-vax. I didn't get the COVID-19 vaccination, but I identify that I did. Please respect my pronouns!
but how american intelligence access chinese hospital records?
didn't Chinese media said same thing about USA claiming that during pre-pandemic era 2019-2020, there were 10s of thousands of american died at "mysterious flu" with pneumia?
Is clear now that we have seen the Fauci emails that the virus really did came from a lab, that Trump was right, and that China should pay to every nation it affected
I have yet to see a day where Trump is right.Is clear now that we have seen the Fauci emails that the virus really did came from a lab, that Trump was right, and that China should pay to every nation it affected
Here are some statements in their original quote form:What we dont have is the entire chain of development. So we dont have the specific mutation where it jumped to humans, so you have the part "originated in an animal probably bats" (because you see the "mutation history" specific to their (or a very similar hosts) bodies in the "code"), and then you have a fully formed version with mutations that was able to jump over to humans. You also have a few maybe intermediates, but it isnt a complete chain of evidence. So what we are missing is either the variant that developed in an intermediary host, or early versions that developed in humans (not in Wuhan, we didnt find them there), for full chain of evidence.
Also, some people are speculating, that part of the mutations found in the Wuhan version, were similar to mutations seen in other viruses in ways that would point to engineering, but there is no clear evidence for that. Just a possibility.
But the possibility is there. What the US now is doing is promoting "we need full openness and access for a commission to look into that" - on part of the health ministry, and the chinese are basically saying "f*ck off" you are trying to spin this into "china poisoned the world, stay put". (Essentially arguing "In the (likely) case we dont find full proof, you are trying to make the world think, its our doing - and make that story stick.")
Usually, even if we take the theory, that it was lab created in China, chinese government would have destroyed any chain of evidence, if there ever was any regardless of intentional spread (probably not - no one is really suggesting intentional spread, even in the lab theories - despite our good friends the conspiracy prone), they would have destroyed it by now - because, well its a public relations nightmare, and security services would have to, really...
Which makes the public insisting of the US health department and US friendly commentators in my country so "odd". Because no one has actual interest in "full transparancy" here - in case there was a lab component. (You dont need that information to prevent future cases, f.e. - its just a 'nice to have', and if there was an accident, the chinese government probably already has that information). Everyone - even the US would have to acknowledge that, so why now there is this naive "we need full clarification, and access for scientific research and..." argument as part of the public relations game thrown out by US officials, is at least curious.
Also we know all of that - for months. I made a posting in here - about there being gaps in the genome development chain more than half a year ago, I think, when DW (the german foreign news outlet, partly state financed) interviewed a research scientist looking into this matter, who said about as much.
And now the "anecdotal story" of "some scientists became sick around that date", is produced as a gapfiller for the theory. But thats not evidence, thats "human interest". Thats story creation, more so than "we've found something". Might be a true story - or not. Chances are, that we'll never find out.
But for some reason, the US government is now publically arguing, that we ought to.
Thats more or less the story, as I understand it.
(There also are stories about the original reporting maybe not having been "up to snuff" - so when press first reported about the definite bat origin of the virus, they maybe having relied too much on a public version the chinese government was producing. But then its _very_ hard to find anything else, especially in China (or the WHO..(There are now more critical voices in the WHO as well, but only after the US stepped forward, it seems...
)..
) And no, WHO isnt bad people, they have to act submissively by design (to get access to countries, to be able to operate there), and yes, they are very much still needed (as a standing communication and action network), so whatever problems you have with them, you better tackle them through internal reform.)
I have yet to see a day where Trump is right.
From a completely objective view, Biden has done infinitely more than Trump has to prevent COVID from spreading. Trump deserves no praise, as he didn't help in that area.
The former president effectively dismantled the pandemic response team before COVID-19 hit, he downplayed the pandemic, he chastised mask wearing, he lied about the virus, he held super spreader events, he had no vaccine distribution plan, and he downplayed the need for people to be vaccinated. Hundreds of thousands of people are dead because of the disastrous pandemic response from the former administration.Wrong. Trump was in office when the virus hit and the first thing he did was close the borders, form a CDC task force, issued social distancing and mask policies and removed restrictions to speed up development of a vaccine.
While Trump was doing this the Liberal left was calling him a racist for acting the way he did and telling us we wouldn't see a vaccine for 2 or more years.
Trump's actions saved millions of lives, but yeah, he's racist for closing the borders.
The entire reason Biden has a vaccine to distribute is because of Trump's actions.
Last thing, right before Trump lost the 2020 election his administration was acting on a plan to vaccinate the population with the vaccines he helped fast track and that "plan" is what Biden used when he took office.
Oh, but, like, Orange Man Bad, bahhhhhhh, bahhhhhhh, bahhhhhh (sheep)
H*ll yeah we were calling him a racist. But that's not because of the border.Wrong. Trump was in office when the virus hit and the first thing he did was close the borders, form a CDC task force, issued social distancing and mask policies and removed restrictions to speed up development of a vaccine.
While Trump was doing this the Liberal left was calling him a racist for acting the way he did and telling us we wouldn't see a vaccine for 2 or more years.
Trump's actions saved millions of lives, but yeah, he's racist for closing the borders.
The entire reason Biden has a vaccine to distribute is because of Trump's actions.
Last thing, right before Trump lost the 2020 election his administration was acting on a plan to vaccinate the population with the vaccines he helped fast track and that "plan" is what Biden used when he took office.
Oh, but, like, Orange Man Bad, bahhhhhhh, bahhhhhhh, bahhhhhh (sheep)
H*ll yeah we were calling him a racist. But that's not because of the border.
If Trump really wanted to be effective, he would've pulled a New Zealand and told everyone (I'm paraphrasing of course): "Y'all get in yo houses and don't come out for two weeks. We'll pay your salary too."
Meanwhile Biden, who is barely in his first year, has signed tons of COVID bills, undoing Trump's actions and actually making it an easier place to live.
Wanna know how I know? D.C. just had its mask mandate removed because of lesser COVID Risk. Wanna know an extreme risk zone during Trumperica? D.C.
Where I live, cases have only gone down due to Governor mandates and, guess who, Joe f**king Biden.
Do you really want to live in a place where you have to wear a mask just to say "g'day neighbor"?
Biden formulated his own plan. I know that because he presented it across the country to tell people that he would decrease COVID risks, and he has.
Long story short:
- Get your vaccine. I don't care* if you "identify as having it." That's not something you can identify without legal proof. Seriously. Being gay doesn't endanger the lives of others, but not getting vaccinated does.
- COVID isn't the Kung Flu or other racist jokes. Read about why the Spanish Flu is called the Spanish Flu and you'll see something new.
- A fourteen year old just presented more valid arguments than brain cells in your head.
- Wear a mask. The anxiety you suffer is little pain for saving the lives of people.
- I will dispute any statement.
*I literally have hit negative caring. Someone said it wasn't possible to care any less, but I just did.