Why are people writing articles saying "THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE" for Monster Hunter 4 but not for about, I dunno, a thousand multiplat multiplayer games?
Oh right, because who gives a shit. Odds are if you're with a group of likeminded gaming friends you'll pick up likeminded consoles. Hell I bought a Xbox 360 because all my friends did (I originally wanted a PS3 but all my friends were playing on the 360).
If you already wanted Monster Hunter 4, odds are you bought the console it was originally announced with in preparation (the 3DS). Having it on the Vita (which is basically confirmed false at this point but I'm using it more as an example) is just expanding the fanbase.
Saying "Having it on another console as well will only hurt it" is just being elitist and exclusionary. Feels really pretentious to say "The game can only be on my system because it's for the greater good." It's not.
Oh right, because who gives a shit. Odds are if you're with a group of likeminded gaming friends you'll pick up likeminded consoles. Hell I bought a Xbox 360 because all my friends did (I originally wanted a PS3 but all my friends were playing on the 360).
If you already wanted Monster Hunter 4, odds are you bought the console it was originally announced with in preparation (the 3DS). Having it on the Vita (which is basically confirmed false at this point but I'm using it more as an example) is just expanding the fanbase.
Saying "Having it on another console as well will only hurt it" is just being elitist and exclusionary. Feels really pretentious to say "The game can only be on my system because it's for the greater good." It's not.