I updated my post with a precise date, which by the way is before the date of the first post. Also, FBI 2.x doesn't use citrus anymore. Finally, how is this "near copy/paste from my codebase"? https://github.com/ksanislo/QRWebLoader/blob/master/source/camera.cpp vs https://github.com/Steveice10/FBI/blob/master/source/ui/section/task/capturecam.c
What FBI 2.0 fork? I assure you I didn't know of such a thing, and that I implemented camera support on my own over several days of debugging.
I didn't know of it, however, and I wouldn't automatically link the addition of HTTP support to the idea of QR-based CIA installation.
I noted that, however it was long after I had already been presented with the idea, as I said.
I appreciate your work fixing the issue in ctrulib, but this has no relation to coming up with the idea of QR code installation or the actual implementation in either application.
I appreciate your work as well, and I'm not trying to claim it's unique or that I was the first to implement it. However, that doesn't change that the idea was suggested to me independently of this, long before I knew about it, and that none of your code was even referenced in implementing it into FBI. You certainly did some impressive work in fixing things up and implementing it well before I got around to it, along with the other contributions you've made to my own works, but I don't take kindly to people claiming that I stole their code.
Well, I linked third party verifiable, and required pieces required to implement this functionality. You provided easily photoshopped screen caps. Give me /something/ verifiable by a third party then.
That wasn't me, that was the other person I mentioned. Plus, I already linked to code which vastly differs between the two projects.
How exactly am I supposed to prove that the idea had already been suggested to me beyond screenshots from the other party from the moment they suggested and experimented with it? The fact that the code differ so vastly should be proof enough that it wasn't ripped from your app.
So no then? Not a single commit showing you even attempted a web based or we based install before well after this was public?
No, as when the idea was suggested, I was still in the middle of rewriting for FBI 2.0. I never got around to it until up to a week before I committed it.
by all means, show that you also implemented a threaded qr code reader and for the concept...come on, we're talking about QR codes here, there is no need to be credited for the idea to use QR codes for anything ever.
yes, because the idea of scanning a QR code which links to a download is suuuuuch a new idea....
I recall the pull for HTTP installation support in citrus, which I didn't use in FBI or correlate in any way to QR codes (I figured it was for an online store type thing, actually), and the pull to FBI 2.0 for RAM texture loading, which was well after it was suggested to me. Despite it being the first to release, I did not originally get the idea or code from this project, so I see no reason why I would have thought to attribute the feature to it.
as stated before, the code differs greatly. You've been credited, in a way, with the pull requests with your name on it... Sure they helped make it possible, but if you hadn't I'm SURE someone else would have done it... also, while I get looking to protect your work, you're looking for credit, if you're in the scene for credit then you're in it for the wrong reasons. Credit comes with good, hard work. Thanks for fixing the stuff and making it easier for developers, but you don't see people looking for credit on every application that uses ctrulib, just because they made a pull request, do you?
as for the lack of attribution for the first implementation, still waiting for CFWs to credit gateway....
So let's get things straight:
