If you enjoy the company of any given race, it is not a form of supremacy. So if Jared says he wants to be around white people, that does not make him a white supremacist either.
The difference is that this man wants to be around white people because he thinks white people are superior to black people and others. His views also don't stop at merely enjoying the company of a particular race.
If someone from an oppressed minority group says they enjoy spending time with other members of that group, that's not to say they dislike spending time with people from the majority group. For example, if a gay person says he enjoys spending time around other gay people, that's not to say there's anything wrong with straight people; it's just a thing that's enjoyable and rare. However, when a member of a majority group with a history of oppression says he likes spending time with members of that group, the implication is usually that he doesn't like spending time with the minority groups.
(Now we both know though what would happen if a white person said this. The media would call this person a white supremacist. And you are perpetuating this inconsistency)
Here is Kamala Harris´ quote:
“I stood in the back, looked around and thought, ‘
This is heaven!’ Harris recounts in her biography, “The Truths We Hold: An American Journey.” “
There were hundreds of people, and everyone looked like me.”
https://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_3899feffb5cc27bc647543934dea6e6c
She didn't say one race was better than another. She didn't say she preferred being around one race over another. She's describing her feelings with regard to increased access to higher education, regardless of "racial and socioeconomic background."
It is more complicated with regards to music but there is little subjectivity in sports.
Stereotypes and overgeneralizations like "black people are better at basketball," for example, are racist. The factors that lead one to believe this kind of overgeneralization have more to do with systemic racism and socioeconomic disparities and little or nothing to do with race and genetics.
I can give you many other examples but I doubt you know about them (in different countries).
You can give me examples of what? Because you're responding to a part of my post where I said a.) Jared Taylor has nothing to do with the 2020 presidential election, and b.) You apparently don't agree with Jared Taylor. Given A and B, there's no reason for us to continue talking about him.
We have been through this. Supremacy means number one. You are mistakenly thinking of superiority in a limited setting.
When I and the rest of the world are talking about white supremacists and white supremacy, we are talking about people who believe white people are better than other races. A white supremacist who says Race A is better at X than white people is still a white supremacist, particularly when we're talking about tired IQ arguments that are the cornerstone for a lot of white supremacist apologetics.
I'm about as interested in semantic arguments about the term "white supremacist" as I am interested in having semantic arguments about the term "homophobe," and I've probably let this one go on for too long.
That is exactly what Middle East needs.
Racism, nationalism, and white supremacy are not what the Middle East needs. These beliefs lead to actions that prioritize white Americans over the Middle East, for example, and these beliefs are also indicative of poor logical reasoning skills that are likely to result in other bad decisions unrelated to one's racism.
That is exactly what Middle East needs. I am sick and tired of American supremacists (including you if you are for interventions) fucking up the Middle East.
I'm not an interventionist.
Obama has called America the only indispensible nation. Do you agree with him? This is actual supremacy.
Do you have a direct quote?
Since you are tired of talking about Taylor, I won´t go into detail about your representation of him. However, I want a clear answer from you:
If Taylor is a supremacist for wanting to live among white people and his country to remain majority white, then why do you not call Israelis accordingly?
- That's not the extent of Taylor's views.
- We're talking about Taylor, not Israel.
You have misrepresented Taylor. He said if poor mothers (he was not specifically talking about any race) have a right to produce an unlimited amount of babies, does society have an unlimited duty to care for them? Voluntary sterilization in exchange for welfare could be a solution - At least this is my memory of it, I don´t know if you want to open this can of worms
Taylor is a self-described eugenicist. He alleges a direct link between poverty and genetics, he alleges a direct link between these supposed "poverty genes" and certain minority races, and he advocates for selectively breeding out those poverty genes/races via eugenics, including but not limited to making welfare contingent upon sterilization.
In reality, the need for welfare has to do systemic racism, socioeconomic disparities, inadequate access to healthcare, inadequate access to education, etc. It has little or nothing to do with race and genetics.
