Because you can use popularity to your advantage!
That's my goal And it's 100% teachable. I'm still pushing to make it a standalone course, though. One of my life goals, if you will.
Currently the US education system attempts to weave it in through other topics. The thinking is that by giving a medium to apply critical thinking, students will learn the critical thinking skills they need. Learn by doing, yeah? This seems to happen mostly in science, but it usually requires a lot of effort on part of the teacher, and is only really learned indirectly. The need to teach and test for mainly information (standardized test, more or less), and not necessarily critical application, makes it more difficult to effectively teach it as well.
Critical thinking skills boil down to learning how to focus one's attention on the details, being able to trace back a line of reasoning to its base assertions and assumptions, breaking down those assertions and assumptions to their elemental pieces, applying logic and knowledge that are internally and externally consistent, and coming up with new solutions or logical conclusions. More or less. Compassion, kindness, and consideration thrown in when it comes to human issues.
You can teach critical thinking directly, though it's more about theory and less about application. Before you can use a thing effectively, you have to understand the thing. Which, when it comes to critical thinking, means understanding how we think and the gaps in our abilities to think accurately, and how all those are influenced by various social and biological elements. Examples of critical thinking education that would teach more direct application would be ethics, how the legal system works, logic, the scientific method, reading comprehension, journalism ethics, etc.
Only if you manage to stay popular though. This is certainly a very short-lived advantage then.Because you can use popularity to your advantage!
probably he just wanted to troll us.
I think his "fake" was well done anyways.
He deleted his videos, i see.
but most of his other works (except Undertale3DS) got releases, videos or something else.
you're gonna need substantial evidence that this is fake.
Yea, true xDLol that's even worse. How long was this video online? A couple of hours, shy of 200 views? And yet this thread had so many clicks and views already,
that people certainly will remember this and not in a good way lol I just don't get it. Oh well, maybe time will prove us all wrong and it was legit after all xD
That raises the question is it guilty until proven innocent or is it innocent until proven guilty doesn't it ?But you don't need evidence to prove that it's real?
Well, that's simulation though, not emulation.And also on O3DS injecting them
Dude relax.So all of his videos of Twilight Princess are deleted and his excuse is:
https://twitter.com/Cellenseres/status/702992358221213697
10/10
Yeah I just thought of what I said and edited my last post..I don't remember bashing him at any point. All I've said is that I feel as if this is bull, and then given a couple pieces of evidence as to why. My last post was just to point out the videos were gone, and Cellenseres' reasoning.
lool this Cellenswhatever guy again.
Isn't he the one trying to convince people he's porting Undertale to the 3ds? (and even trying to persuade Tony to let himpirateport it)
This crap certainly puts that in doubt too. No wonder he's saying "I'm using the official SDK" It's a convenient excuse to hide the source code (because it doesn't exist).
Edit: impressive Github repo lol
Generally (like always actually) someone with the skill to pull off what this guy alleges has a history of impressive open source projects or released binaries. This guy has not a single line of code or release to his name that I can find.That raises the question is it guilty until proven innocent or is it innocent until proven guilty doesn't it ?