well, excuse me for making a typo when on my tiny cellphone screen. So sorry.i dont think you know what the word partisan means
well, excuse me for making a typo when on my tiny cellphone screen. So sorry.i dont think you know what the word partisan means
what word were you trying to say? i get the cell phone thing, typing on gbatemp on mobile is super glitchy for mewell, excuse me for making a typo when on my tiny cellphone screen. So sorry.
oh, how could I be so forgetful.....? The whole reason this thread exists is because Pedocrats think the AP is the decider of who wins elections..... derp.and because NPR relies on the AP for election results
Wow, you're really pulling some weird unrelated shit out of nowhere there. I was only stating that Snopes is not "bi-partisan" at all and has an agenda for the left as well.
- None of your complaints show evidence of wide-spread voter fraud.As someone who nitpicks the quoting system and cites it as a point
We do not have any verification of ID or eligibility to vote.
We did not have legal due process allowing mail in ballots in PA.
We did not have legal and proper poll watchers allowed to do there jobs.
And I am not subscribing to where you set the goal posts.
I as a voter & citzens along with millions of other deem this election illegitimate. Period.
oh, how could I be so forgetful.....? The whole reason this thread exists is because Pedocrats think the AP is the decider of who wins elections..... derp.
- None of your complaints show evidence of wide-spread voter fraud.
- None of your complaints show evidence of election conspiracy.
- Trump and his allies have a 1-41 record in post-election litigation because there is no evidence of wide-spread voter fraud or conspiracy.
- Most poll observer allegations are founded on lies. I personally debunked one [here] and [here].
Try rewriting your comment without subjective adjectives.
The Democrats took the word GOD out of the Pledge of Allegiance at the Democrat National Convention. At first I thought they made a mistake, but it wasn’t. It was done on purpose. Remember Evangelical Christians, and ALL, this is where they are coming from-it’s done. Vote Nov 3!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 22, 2020
Still waiting for your evidence when we both know you don't have any. 1-41.Try rewriting your comment without subjective adjectives.
so you aren't framing my claims or concerns.
At least he didn't say trunalimunumaprzure. Your idea of a president makes up his own "big words"....Big words coming from someone who loves to put words in peoples mouths
What do you guys think about this website?
https://hereistheevidence.com/
It provides about 125 examples (with the respective sources) of voter fraud they would consider admissible as evidence in court, rated by significance and admissibility.
(It also provides about 1000 unverified/unverifiable/new claims.)
You need valid ID in order to REGISTER to vote, so what are you going on about? You're hitting that crackpipe a little too hard my guy.We do not have any verification of ID or eligibility to vote.
We did not have legal due process allowing mail in ballots in PA.
We did not have legal and proper poll watchers allowed to do there jobs.
And I am not subscribing to where you set the goal posts.
I as a voter & citzens along with millions of other deem this election illegitimate. Period.
Exactly. People are waking up to religion just being bullshit. We don't want it or need it.Please be more vague.
The claim: The DNC omitted "under GOD", is false.
Some people at the convention omitted it, which is not the same thing.
That is not subjective.
Trumps twitter post on the matter is misleadingly wrong too.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1297132096448864258
"The Democrats" didn't take out anything.
They present about 125 sourced pieces of evidence with varying degrees of significance and of admissibility-in-court (from 1 to 4 in their classification).
This exercise demonstrates that tabzer will support an allegation of election rigging if the evidence exists. I challenged him to provide "evidence" supporting his allegation that the "US govt rigs foreign elections" and he got right to it by sharing a wikipedia article.
However, when challenged to provide evidence for 2020 election rigging, he balked. Why? Because the evidence doesn't exist.
Wtf u talking bout? Election are determined by votes simple math 80million vs 72million ... not faith... that it just a flat out excuse..Elections are a matter of faith
Wtf u talking bout? Election are determined by votes simple math 80million vs 72million ... not faith... that it just plan excuses..
"I don't like the participant of the election that won, despite it not even being my country, so I will declare that election false and try to drum up evidence that doesn't exist so I can claim that my way of thinking is correct and try to appeal to a nonexistent majority of people think that the election is fraudulent as well, despite said candidate winning the popular vote. All this while still, again, not having any evidence I will claim a number of injustices and tell anyone they are naive for not believing in my asinine statements and conspiracy theories"Because all evidence is contested by opposing parties, ignored, or obstructed. Getting your stamp of approval is not my point. My point, which I made several times already, is that the election system needs to inspire faith in its constituents. You made an appeal to an authority that has history of deceit and misrepresentation. You called that a conspiracy theory.
So yeah, good on you to circle all the way back to my original assessment. I have no faith that such an election has happened. I don't have to prove that. Elections are a matter of faith, and what is more transparent than ever before, is the total lack of it. Electing a president who promised to weed out corruption in a rigged system, as absurd as that was, was tantamount to admitting that the system is bankrupt on its credibility. You want to try to recover that from that with Biden? Ok. Nice choice.
"I don't like the participant of the election that won, despite it not even being my country, so I will declare that election false and try to drum up evidence that doesn't exist so I can claim that my way of thinking is correct and try to appeal to a nonexistent majority of people think that the election is fraudulent as well, despite said candidate winning the popular vote. All this while still, again, not having any evidence I will claim a number of injustices and tell anyone they are naive for not believing in my asinine statements and conspiracy theories"