well sort of is. still using haxchi to launch mocha to launch rednand is just asking for corruption.RedNAND isn't a CFW though.
well sort of is. still using haxchi to launch mocha to launch rednand is just asking for corruption.RedNAND isn't a CFW though.
Who says? Of course it's a CFW.RedNAND isn't a CFW though.
well sort of is. still using haxchi to launch mocha to launch rednand is just asking for corruption.
No... Mocha is a CFW. RedNAND is just a redirection method that CFWs use.Who says? Of course it's a CFW.
Not true. You don't need CFW to launch redNAND. You can launch it just fine without Mocha and when running redNAND it takes the place of sysnand redirect or no. It's a CFW with sigpatches.No... Mocha is a CFW. RedNAND is just a redirection method that CFWs use.
You can launch RedNAND without Mocha but you do at least need some sort of CFW even if it's just a patched fw.img. RedNAND is part of a CFW, it's not a CFW in itself. It also doesn't say anything about sigpatches, you could very well run a patched fw.img that has RedNAND and nothing else.Not true. You don't need CFW to launch redNAND. You can launch it just fine without Mocha and when running redNAND it takes the place of sysnand redirect or no. It's a CFW with sigpatches.
Ok semantics but when you run redNAND by itself (without mocha) you're operating in a CFW state. That's all that matters.You can launch RedNAND without Mocha but you do at least need some sort of CFW even if it's just a patched fw.img. RedNAND is part of a CFW, it's not a CFW in itself. It also doesn't say anything about sigpatches, you could very well run a patched fw.img that has RedNAND and nothing else.