Good. Yes some HDDs can last that much (9-15 years), but they begin to degrade earlier, working slow, sometimes crashing, at least that's what I remember when I was still using HDD in my laptop.
I was just replying to Sypherone's "Really???" response.You answered your own question:
I'm aware that at the end of the day they all use NAND flash memory, but there are many different types of NAND cells and some types are much more durable than others.SD = Flash drive. Yes, a really, really good one might work for a few years, still I wouldn't recommend it.
It is an eMMC chip though? MLC just stands for "Multi-Level Cell" - referring to the type of NAND technology used inside the eMMC chip.eMMC? Please go into detail some more: It's a MLC... Cached by an SLC chip (yes, you read that correctly: There's another flash storage just to keep wear off the main flash) which itself is cached by a RAMdisc (storage inception just to not wear out the MLC too fast) + doing other tricks to higher the lifetime... Also it is not recommended to install anything to NAND: Keep it as free as possible, so you have a ton of cold cells, for a longer lifetime!
I am acutely aware - I wrote a whole post about Samsung MLC chips having a firmware bug which could be one of the potential causes of the 160-0103 error on some Wii U consoles:-As others stated, Hynix MLC chips are dying like crazy lately. In other words: There are already a lot of bricked Wii Us cause the MLC died.
I appreciate that, and I understand why people should be wary of using flash drives, but I just think its become too generalised a concern. Technology has moved on since Nintendo's original recommendation in 2012 to only use HDD's and not flash drives with the Wii U. Its true that some flash drives will be made using the cheapest type of NAND cell and wont withstand being written thousands of times, but some NAND is designed for exactly that purpose, and I personally cant see the harm in using a quality microSD card in a USB reader, whilst keeping in mind that there is a potential risk of it failing.At the end of the day what to use is complely up to you. We are just telling you what we see from interpreting forum posts, bug reports, Discord discussions and stuff.
Thanks for the detailed info on Wii U's internal storage, I didn't know it worked like that. I installed a few games to the NAND, just because some games couldn't fit on my Wii U HDD. Speaking of which, I use 240GB Samsung EVO 850 SSD in enclosure for my Wii U games and another SSD, much, much smaller, for vWii side (without enclosure), running both at same time so that I don't have to switch between external HDDs all the time.eMMC? Please go into detail some more: It's a MLC... Cached by an SLC chip (yes, you read that correctly: There's another flash storage just to keep wear off the main flash) which itself is cached by a RAMdisc (storage inception just to not wear out the MLC too fast) + doing other tricks to higher the lifetime... Also it is not recommended to install anything to NAND: Keep it as free as possible, so you have a ton of cold cells, for a longer lifetime!
As others stated, Hynix MLC chips are dying like crazy lately. In other words: There are already a lot of bricked Wii Us cause the MLC died.
If would be possible, it had done already. If iam right they working still on it. There exists only the CFW mocha fat32 for use with fat32 drives.If so is there any way we could disable the filesystem encryption module in the Wii U OS? I
This information is from statistics from a Server farm where are the drives 24/7/365 are under heavy load. Blazeblade provide such public information.A typical HDD lasts 3 to 5 years, some even die earlier because of mechanical failure.
Which is buggy as hell as FAT doesn't offer everything the Wii U needs. AFAIK somebody is working on NTFS support through. NTFS sounds like a good replacement for the Wii U file system.There exists only the CFW mocha fat32
That is way overkill though. The Wii U won't take advantage of the fast speeds and a cheap Y-cable is a simple solution for 2.5" HDDs that works. Certainly wouldn't recommend going out and buying a SSD just for that, if you have one laying around and you have nothing else to use it on (even as a game drive for frequently played PC games) then sure.You can use a USB to Sata adapter cable and connect a 2.5" SSD to that, the Wii U's USB port will provide enough power to power the SSD.
I'm using this: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sabrent-2-...d-EC-SSHD-USB-3-0-SSD-SATA-2-5/dp/B011M8YACM/ with an old 128gb SSD, it's worked fine on my Wii U for years.
A typical HDD lasts 3 to 5 years...
...i see this is written on lot if sites, even on sites from data specialists...
That is way overkill though. The Wii U won't take advantage of the fast speeds and a cheap Y-cable is a simple solution for 2.5" HDDs that works. Certainly wouldn't recommend going out and buying a SSD just for that, if you have one laying around and you have nothing else to use it on (even as a game drive for frequently played PC games) then sure.
Plus, SSDs have limited write cycles too. Won't wear out as quickly as a flash drive thanks to wear leveling, but it will potentially wear out quicker than a HDD would.
Which is cheaply solved with a Y-cable, as I said, no need for a SSD.It's not about the speeds, it's about the power usage which was the concern of the original poster.
For some additional context I have the GameCube controller adaptor connected to the two front USB ports, a USB ethernet adaptor in one of the back ports and my SSD in the other, meaning I didn't have enough USB ports free to power a hard drive.
Also SSD's don't degrade when reading data, only writing. How much data do you realistically think the Wii U is going to write to that SSD once it's been filled with games? Someone would have to spend all day installing Wii U games to the SSD, delete everything, then repeat the process again 1000's of times to cause any major detriment to an SSD. It would have to be a very poor SSD to not outlive a hard drive under normal use.
Apparently a lot, flash drives only degrade when writing data too, and yet there are all the reports of flash drives dying within hours.
Flash memory in general is rated for about 10000 write cycles, there's nothing special about the flash memory in SSDs, it's just the wear leveling of the controller helping to prevent certain flash cells wearing out before the others. As I already said a SSD won't wear out as quickly as a flash drive, but potentially quicker than a cheap external HDD would. The comparison was mainly to HDDs. Anyway, if a flash drive dies in hours, even if a SSD lasts 1000 times a long that's still a cause for concern, since the Wii U writes to the drive in standby mode too, not just when you're playing. Leave your Wii U unused for 6 months or a year and come back to a failed drive.The average SSD can sustain 1000's more terabytes written than the average flash drive, you are trying to compare apples to oranges here.
A typical HDD lasts 3 to 5 years, some even die earlier because of mechanical failure.
This 3 to 5 year lifetime commes from a server farm statistic like Blazblade as Cloudservice where are 25.000 drives run 24/7/365 around the clock. They are permanent under heavy load like spinning up and down, reading and writting, high heat and worst for the machinal parts. Backblaze uses Consumer HDDs, not Enterprise HDDs that are especially created to run 24/7 and more reliable to run in such Server farms. So you can easy imagen, as home user that doesnt have that load like a Cloudservice. If you would run the drives daily between 8 and 12 hours, There is a theoretical 80% chance that the drive livetime take about 8-12 years.Good. Yes some HDDs can last that much (9-15 years), but they begin to degrade earlier, working slow, sometimes crashing, at least that's what I remember when I was still using HDD in my laptop.