I know there's americans in this thread (mostly) so whilst not intending to cast pearls at swine, if I may say - why are you focusing on this being an issue where the domestic abuser might be able to get a gun. If someone is going to break the law they will get a gun irrespective, however wouldn't it stand to reason this also allows a victim of abuse or someone intending on self defense to have the firearm which may save their life?
but no, aericans hear the word trump and start frothing at the mouth.
I know there's americans in this thread (mostly) so whilst not intending to cast pearls at swine, if I may say - why are you focusing on this being an issue where the domestic abuser might be able to get a gun. If someone is going to break the law they will get a gun irrespective, however wouldn't it stand to reason this also allows a victim of abuse or someone intending on self defense to have the firearm which may save their life?
but no, aericans hear the word trump and start frothing at the mouth.
but no, aericans hear the word trump and start frothing at the mouth.
Post automatically merged:
I know there's americans in this thread (mostly) so whilst not intending to cast pearls at swine, if I may say - why are you focusing on this being an issue where the domestic abuser might be able to get a gun. If someone is going to break the law they will get a gun irrespective, however wouldn't it stand to reason this also allows a victim of abuse or someone intending on self defense to have the firearm which may save their life?
but no, aericans hear the word trump and start frothing at the mouth.