Dragon Quest X: Rise of the Five Tribes announced

[machomuu]

Square-Enix still hasn't learn their lesson. Congratulation, you just completely ruined this game by making a MMORPG.

I know, right?
How many more franchises do they want to taint with MMORPGs?
Not that there's anything wrong with the genre, but Square Enix have no idea what they're doing!

Exactly, because you guys have both played it and know just how bad it is.

There's no need to play it to know a game concept is bad or not.

A bad concept doesn't always equal a bad game in the end product.

 

[Maedhros]

Yeah, there's still time for them to make it better than what was shown (which was really, really bad).

Anyway, I would not get it even if I had a Wii.

 

[machomuu]

Yeah, there's still time for them to make it better than what was shown (which was really, really bad).

Anyway, I would not get it even if I had a Wii.

Only thing I think needs changing is the subscription fees and the online Singleplayer, that or they make it an MSO. Can't say the overhaul bothers me at all.

 

[Giga_Gaia]

Square-Enix still hasn't learn their lesson. Congratulation, you just completely ruined this game by making a MMORPG.

I know, right?
How many more franchises do they want to taint with MMORPGs?
Not that there's anything wrong with the genre, but Square Enix have no idea what they're doing!

Exactly, because you guys have both played it and know just how bad it is.

There's no need to play it to know a game concept is bad or not.

A bad concept doesn't always equal a bad game in the end product.

Give up, Square-Enix and MMORPG are a terrible combo. They can't even manage FF14, the one they already have out.

Not only it's Square-Enix and a MMORPG, but a MMORPG on Wii is laughable at best.

 

[machomuu]

Square-Enix still hasn't learn their lesson. Congratulation, you just completely ruined this game by making a MMORPG.

I know, right?
How many more franchises do they want to taint with MMORPGs?
Not that there's anything wrong with the genre, but Square Enix have no idea what they're doing!

Exactly, because you guys have both played it and know just how bad it is.

There's no need to play it to know a game concept is bad or not.

A bad concept doesn't always equal a bad game in the end product.

Give up, Square-Enix and MMORPG are a terrible combo. They can't even manage FF14, the one they already have out.

Not only it's Square-Enix and a MMORPG, but a MMORPG on Wii is laughable at best.

That's Square, this is Enix. The difference is noticeable.

Also, Monster unter Tri was an MMO that could be played offline and it did pretty well (this can't be played offline, but still).

 

[Jiggah]

This game is definitely not going to be released in territories outside Japan, if at all, in a timely fashion.

1. It's an RPG
2. It's an MMO

The fact that it's an RPG means there a shit ton of dialogue for them to translate. Add to that fact that it's an MMO means they have continuous addons that need translations, too. People hoping this will be a Wii U launch title...yea, it won't be for anywhere else, but Japan.

There is extremely high chance they won't ever release this on the Wii outside of Japan. The Wii U is only a year away and they haven't even given a solid release date for this game in Japan. The one that other territories will get is the Wii U version and that will definitely not be at the Wii U launch. Just my speculation.

I was totally pumped for this game until I started hearing the news for it. Every additional news item just makes me sadder.

@machomuu

MHTri is not an MMO. It's 4 player coop with a lobby system. DQX is most definitely an MMO.

 

[Maedhros]

Square-Enix still hasn't learn their lesson. Congratulation, you just completely ruined this game by making a MMORPG.

I know, right?
How many more franchises do they want to taint with MMORPGs?
Not that there's anything wrong with the genre, but Square Enix have no idea what they're doing!

Exactly, because you guys have both played it and know just how bad it is.

There's no need to play it to know a game concept is bad or not.

A bad concept doesn't always equal a bad game in the end product.

Give up, Square-Enix and MMORPG are a terrible combo. They can't even manage FF14, the one they already have out.

Not only it's Square-Enix and a MMORPG, but a MMORPG on Wii is laughable at best.

That's Square, this is Enix. The difference is noticeable.

Also, Monster unter Tri was an MMO that could be played offline and it did pretty well (this can't be played offline, but still).

The fuck you're talking about? Enix and Square are the same, Square Enix. We're in 2011, remember?
And Monster Hunter wasn't an MMO. It was a singleplayer game WITH multiplayer.

 

[Nathanaël]

Of course this will get a release outside of Japan.

Dragon Quest is a main franchise published by Nintendo in Europe.

They prepared everything with DQ IV, V, VI, IX, JM & JM2 on Nintendo DS already.

What do you think how long it takes to translate a book with 800 pages for a team? Two weeks or so. It's no problem if you can spend some cash.

@machomuu: You are intelligent obviously. You know, you should not talk with these guys about Dragon Quest. You can't convince them, they won't even understand what you're talking about.

 

[machomuu]

Square-Enix still hasn't learn their lesson. Congratulation, you just completely ruined this game by making a MMORPG.

I know, right?
How many more franchises do they want to taint with MMORPGs?
Not that there's anything wrong with the genre, but Square Enix have no idea what they're doing!

Exactly, because you guys have both played it and know just how bad it is.

There's no need to play it to know a game concept is bad or not.

A bad concept doesn't always equal a bad game in the end product.

Give up, Square-Enix and MMORPG are a terrible combo. They can't even manage FF14, the one they already have out.

Not only it's Square-Enix and a MMORPG, but a MMORPG on Wii is laughable at best.

That's Square, this is Enix. The difference is noticeable.

Also, Monster unter Tri was an MMO that could be played offline and it did pretty well (this can't be played offline, but still).

The fuck you're talking about? Enix and Square are the same, Square Enix. We're in 2011, remember?
And Monster Hunter wasn't an MMO. It was a singleplayer game WITH multiplayer.

It's often considered an MMO, and basically is.

Also SE is simply a merger, there's still Square and Enix. Final Fantasy is not Enix's, it's Squares. Enix is more like the adopted father that has little to do with it. Vice versa for DQ.

That's the f*ck I'm talking about, and I made it easy to understand.

 

[Maedhros]

No, that's not how Square-Enix works at all.

And you're wrong about Monster Hunter.

 

[machomuu]

No, that's not how Square-Enix works at all.

It's close.

Is that all? This debate is getting boring.

 

[Nathanaël]

I really hope that DQ 10 will cost $20 per months when I read that stuff here. But I'm quite sure it won't.

 

[Maedhros]

Yeah, it gets boring when you're wrong.

Nobody in their minds consider MH series to be a MMO. Because it's not.

And Square-Enix is Square-Enix, it's not like Eidos, which even being incorpored in the SE, still has it's development team there.

 

[Nathanaël]

Dragon Quest (Enix) is something very different than Final Fantasy (Square). At least for Die Hard Dragon Quest fans.

 

[machomuu]

Yeah, it gets boring when you're wrong.

Nobody in their minds consider MH series to be a MMO. Because it's not.

And Square-Enix is Square-Enix, it's not like Eidos, which even being incorpored in the SE, still has it's development team there.

There are plenty of people that consider it that, though officially that's not what it is.

Also- well, Nathanaël pretty much said it.

 

[Maedhros]

Dragon Quest (Enix) is something very different than Final Fantasy (Square). At least for Die Hard Dragon Quest fans.

Because they're two different series? Doesn't mean that it's Enix that's making Dragon Quest now, it's Square-Enix.

I can understand what you said though.

 

[machomuu]

Dragon Quest (Enix) is something very different than Final Fantasy (Square). At least for Die Hard Dragon Quest fans.

Because they're two different series? Doesn't mean that it's Enix that's making Dragon Quest now, it's Square-Enix.

I can understand what you said though.

Then elaborate as to how it's made by both Enix and Square?

 

[Maedhros]

Dragon Quest (Enix) is something very different than Final Fantasy (Square). At least for Die Hard Dragon Quest fans.

Because they're two different series? Doesn't mean that it's Enix that's making Dragon Quest now, it's Square-Enix.

I can understand what you said though.

Then elaborate as to how it's made by both Enix and Square?

Since they fused, it's being made by Square-Enix. That means, since DQVIII, the series is from Square-Enix, not only Enix.

 

[machomuu]

Dragon Quest (Enix) is something very different than Final Fantasy (Square). At least for Die Hard Dragon Quest fans.

Because they're two different series? Doesn't mean that it's Enix that's making Dragon Quest now, it's Square-Enix.

I can understand what you said though.

Then elaborate as to how it's made by both Enix and Square?

Since they fused, it's being made by Square-Enix. That means, since DQVIII, the series is from Square-Enix, not only Enix.

While that means that it's by SE, it doesn't mean it was developed by both the members of Square and the members of Enix.

 

[Nathan Drake]

Except Square Enix is one company, not two separate ones. That means a single staff, not a staff on one half of the building and a staff on the other representing the two companies.