Sept and TSEC use same keys for signing...
Basically Sept is a signed payload for TSEC...
Hexkyz does have the skills to bypass TSEC. But none of the members in TX do. Nice try mate. I've had fun arguing with you. But I think it's time to hit the ignore button. See you around
TSEC and Sept are different things.
And it's no longer profitable for the developers to update it.SX OS is Gateway 2:
4.-The paid CFW becomes obsolete and developers are lazy to update it
We don't have any reason to think TX has the skills necessary to break TSEC, and it might be such an undertaking for them that it's no longer profitable for them to offer updates for SX OS.What argument? All you've been doing is be wrong.
Arrogant bullshit that there is only one person in the entire world that can hack things. I guess you like the strong erections you can only maintain by thinking in this way.
Maybe someone has sold TX an exploit already, who knows.
Sure, but you said bypass sept and now you are trying to change your argument to signing sept, which isn't bypassing it all.
It's provably false that it's impossible to sign sept.
People should use whatever they're most comfortable with, but it's possible that SX OS won't ever work on anything over 6.2.0, and it's recommended that users update to Atmosphere.people just have to use whatever os they like and end of story.. what does it matter to one that another person uses sxos, atmo , rei, etc .. ?
We don't have any reason to think TX has the skills necessary to break TSEC, and it might be such an undertaking for them that it's no longer profitable for them to offer updates for SX OS.
How can you start your post certain they are roadblocks and then bury that maybe you're wrong in the middle of the post?
They could be lying of course, but only time will tell. Think how you would feel if literally every time you spoke then someone just started shouting at you saying you were lying?
hey man i am waiting for your os and it needs to be 7.0.1 compatible eh.. as its so easy to make that there should not be roadblocks... if any other dev of any other os tells you something then you will not think they are credible ? -.-
If they had the skills this thread wouldn't existWe don't have any reason to think TX doesn't have the skills either. Anyone who is sure just has cognitive bias.
The problem is, when it comes to the big issues of NVIDIA/Nintendo security, TX has seemingly only ever waited for public exploits to become available before issuing updates to SX OS. That's not going to happen with 7.0.x, which means they have to independently break TSEC or use sept. Given this information, the former doesn't seem likely, although it is possible.We don't have any reason to think TX doesn't have the skills either. Anyone who is sure just has cognitive bias.
Not quite. I said that there appears to be "roadblocks." I suppose that also depends on how they define the term "roadblock." For all I know, Team-Xecuter is just about done with 7.0.x support, and will release an update any moment. I doubt that will happen though.
If they had the skills this thread wouldn't exist
The problem is, when it comes to the big issues of NVIDIA/Nintendo security, TX has seemingly only ever waited for public exploits to become available before issuing updates to SX OS. That's not going to happen with 7.0.x, which means they have to independently break TSEC or use sept. Given this information, the former doesn't seem likely, although it is possible.
In addition, if SX OS isn't as profitable as it used to be, then the skills of TX are irrelevant if they're not getting paid to provide 7.0.x support.
Speculation doesn't pay the bills. I'd say its more likely that they are doing nothing and waiting around for someone else to do the work for them.You're free to doubt it, but why do you feel the need to pass your doubts off as facts?
Wrong, they may have only just done it and are now updating the rest of their software to work with 7.x. It's impossible to draw any conclusions.
Speculation doesn't pay the bills. I'd say its more likely that they are doing nothing and waiting around for someone else to do the work for them.
I'm articulating why it's reasonable to think TX might abandon SX OS. If it's not happening now, it's something people should acknowledge as a real possibility down the road.Sure, you can speculate that. What benefit does that speculation offer you?
I'm articulating why it's reasonable to think TX might abandon SX OS. If it's not happening now, it's something people should acknowledge as a real possibility down the road.
Sure, but we can also note that, if sales are as flat as indicated in other threads, it could be now that SX OS is abandoned. In addition, we can also note that breaking TSEC is not easy, and it might not be in TX's skillhouse.It's a certainty that TX will abandon SX OS. When that will happen is impossible to predict
Well, I'm not aware of any indication that this is happening anytime soon, but it's a good thing that Atmosphere is open source and can be edited and/or forked by anybody.News flash... SciresM will abandon atmosphere.
Sure, but we can also note that, if sales are as flat as indicated in other threads, it could be now that SX OS is abandoned. In addition, we can also note that breaking TSEC is not easy, and it might not be in TX's skillhouse.
Well, I'm not aware of any indication that this is happening anytime soon, but it's a good thing that Atmosphere is open source and can be edited and/or forked by anybody.