I can't even get atmosphere to boot on my hackable switch, so I can only use hekate and SX. I've even used a brand new sd card with nothing else on it. Newest payloads, newest keys dumped, etc... Nothing would work.
What lies do I tell. Atmo is used for piracy. The percentage of people that don't use it for piracy are moot. Why do you think that's a lie? Its 100% true. Don't lie to yourself. It's like you're laying groundwork for a future lie.
I personally use atmosphere to run smash mods, backup saves and screw around with whatever homebrew looks interesting to me.
Custom themes and game modding are "legit" uses for Atmosphere/CFW without piracy.
I take issue with "the percentage of people that don't use it for piracy are moot." We exist, and even if many users do use Atmosphere for piracy, it's not the only purpose or the intended one.
Its like saying molesting children is more infuriating than rape. BOTH are wrong. Period.Stealing a copy of a work and claiming to be the one who created the original are obviously different on their face. Stealing credit is something that I personally find to be far more infuriating than the stealing of a physical item.
It has been decrypted and reverse engineered.That still doesn't answer the main part of my question
I was just on a discord asking for some homebrew help a minute ago and I mentioned I was on sxos. Immediately I got botted saying that SXOS was illegal because "It bundles various keys and copyrighted data that cannot be legally shared". I didn't know if this was fully true because SXOS was closed source so I asked how that was discovered and I was told "being closed source is another reason it's bad and not good. Anyway I won't take this any farther because it's not allowed" even though I didn't find that rule in rules. I remember having a similar situation happened in a now dead discord when I got banned instantly by a certain homebrew developer. It always seemed odd to me.
TL;DR: is it really confirmed that SXOS distributes copyrighted keys? If so how was this discovered since the program is close-sourced?
Was it the Nintendo Homebrew discord? They are heavily anti piracy and even mentioning anything vaguely piracy related, like sig patches, will make people not help you.I was just on a discord asking for some homebrew help a minute ago and I mentioned I was on sxos. Immediately I got botted saying that SXOS was illegal because "It bundles various keys and copyrighted data that cannot be legally shared". I didn't know if this was fully true because SXOS was closed source so I asked how that was discovered and I was told "being closed source is another reason it's bad and not good. Anyway I won't take this any farther because it's not allowed" even though I didn't find that rule in rules. I remember having a similar situation happened in a now dead discord when I got banned instantly by a certain homebrew developer. It always seemed odd to me.
TL;DR: is it really confirmed that SXOS distributes copyrighted keys? If so how was this discovered since the program is close-sourced?
SwitchPirates discord maybe.Do you know of any that don't shun you to the ground? I've been looking for one
The thing is I'm not looking to pirate. That's why it seems so gray to meI mean if your were planning on pirating with your hacked switch the whole aspect of sxos being illegal shouldn't matter much to you
Thanks for the detailed response. Atmosphere is definitely my first choice since it's free, but my desire to have homebrew on my Mariko unit outweighed my desire to use atmosphere. I've tried both on an old switch and there are definitely pros and cons to either. The emunand from SXOS is pretty legit in avoiding bans. I'm not sure if the Atmosphere emunand-or emumcc thing-is quite as fail proof. However atmosphere allows sys-patches so things like over locking are possible, not to mention you can actually get support.Yep. Lots of stolen code and whatnot, from what I understand. While I've used it before (and it had its perks), I too ran into the same situations you described. A lot of people in the Switch homebrew and development scene feel that SXOS is bad in a lot of ways, and many will tell you NOT to use it, often for the above reasons, and some will even outright ban you JUST for mentioning that you use it. Some homebrew was even designed to look for signs of SXOS on your system, and either warn you that this software may not work as intended (or just outright exit). They have their reasons for doing this, and while some of their responses to SXOS use may seem questionable (or even downright hostile, as I've witnessed), it's best to just take their advice, and dump it entirely.
There are better, free alternatives, and these even often update in a timely manner whenever Switch firmware updates release. I highly recommend Atmosphère. It's compatible with most homebrew and isn't too difficult to set up. Best of all, it's free. You may need sys patches to run your game backups, though.
Speaking of which, Atmosphère was just updated again yesterday, and adds a lot of new features and bug fixes, and the biggest thing that excites me is the addition of "Daybreak," a new homebrew app that uses the new "am:su" system updater API to allow upgrades and even downgrades. It's touted as safer alternative to ChoiDuJour. There's even tentative partial support for Mariko units (though they warn you not to run AMS on them just yet. Their project roadmap was also added, and it looks like they have a lot of plans for the remainder of the summer.
Theres really nothing gray about it. Sxos is intended for full blown piracy. If you only want homebrew its a waste of money to buy the sxos regardless of its backstory and its illegal methods. That should have been the go to answer for your decision, but here we are on the 5th page lolThe thing is I'm not looking to pirate. That's why it seems so gray to me
.
you likely got banned because free homebrew apps and trolls hate sx osI was just on a discord asking for some homebrew help a minute ago and I mentioned I was on sxos. Immediately I got botted saying that SXOS was illegal because "It bundles various keys and copyrighted data that cannot be legally shared". I didn't know if this was fully true because SXOS was closed source so I asked how that was discovered and I was told "being closed source is another reason it's bad and not good. Anyway I won't take this any farther because it's not allowed" even though I didn't find that rule in rules. I remember having a similar situation happened in a now dead discord when I got banned instantly by a certain homebrew developer. It always seemed odd to me.
TL;DR: is it really confirmed that SXOS distributes copyrighted keys? If so how was this discovered since the program is close-sourced?
sx os is no different to any other exploit as it all allows piracy, you could be like me and use sx os and other exploits but sill only play legit game carts and use sx os for its homebrew functions such as emulation and cheats.Theres really nothing gray about it. Sxos is intended for full blown piracy. If you only want homebrew its a waste of money to buy the sxos regardless of its backstory and its illegal methods. That should have been the go to answer for your decision, but here we are on the 5th page lol
Actually it is different in a point of view. Atmoshere by default does not have the ability to play pirated content. Only the end-user can make that happen if he/she chooses to providing sigpatches, while the sxos comes prepacked with sigpatches or in the anti sxos user terms stolen keys thats what brings up the illegal bit.you likely got banned because free homebrew apps and trolls hate sx os
every exploit regardless of what they say is illegal.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
sx os is no different to any other exploit as it all allows piracy, you could be like me and use sx os and other exploits but sill only play legit game carts and use sx os for its homebrew functions such as emulation and cheats.
if someone steals your tv, it means you no longer have access to it, but code (and games, music, movies, etc) can be infinitely copied without degrading, even if SXOS exists it doesnt mean atmosphere stopped existing, its an asshole thing to sell someone else's work while claiming it to be yours, but it isnt theftOk? I did preface it by stating that it was my personal opinion. I'd be pissed if someone stole my TV. I'd be absolutely livid if someone started selling my creative work while claiming that they made it. The TV is identical, one of many, whereas the code is one of a kind. It's a difference of magnitude. Also, I'm pretty sure that the theft of intellectual property generally falls under a different set of laws than petty theft, but I'm no lawyer. Hence, although it is a type of theft, it isn't even close to being treated identically by the legal system.
cant speak for others, but its 7:51 where i live, im kinda bored and seeing this discussion certainly helpedDo we really need 5 pages for something that could be answered in two sentences? Why are you guys still posting there?