Seems a lot has happened. Will have to get back to it later
edit Might as well have a new favourite video though (the categorisation bit doing well for this discussion).
and another because I am greedy
For now though
Let me ask in another way. What is "god" that you are to assert a non-belief of? Do you not see the irony of asserting what is supposedly a passive trait? Or do you pretend that these sequences of words are not logically possible?
Gods are a concept that a variety of religions (but not all) describe which either created the universe, or were created alongside it and served to further create things as they are today and possibly have a hand in running things, usually also have traits in/actions from humans they consider desirable. Omnipotence (all knowing and all powerful) and immortality (or at least immortality from the perspective of humans) are common traits ascribed to them, this being the case for the god of the Jews, Christian sects and Islam which nominally share the same deity (a singularly powerful being above all others that in the English language usually gets given the name God and has a capital G to denote such).
Common to all of them though is the lack of a test to determine/prove their existence, or other evidence that might be used to determine such. Such a lack of evidence is the basis for atheism (the lack of a belief in a god) or at least agnosticism (for some a weaker form of atheism that starts from the premise that while there is no proof of a god there also lacks a proof of no god).
So that is four sentences with a bit of fluff thrown in there as well that I would say pretty adequately describes the concepts under discussion. You seem to be making out that it is all far more complicated but I am not seeing how. The forum can, and has, discussed things in more depth as there are all sorts of logical problems and thought experiments to consider (Stuff like Pascal's Gambit, why God, or indeed God of some sect of Christianity (various the versions of Judaism and Islam, or indeed other "Christians" would probably claim to have the one true line on God's desires and wishes, most others faltering somewhere in their understanding), and not Thor, Zeus, Amaterasu, Vishnu or one of infinite other gods that are often mutually incompatible? If the god in question is all seeing and all powerful why is there suffering when it is trivial for it to stop it from happening? How can man be made in the image of the gods when a man has a shade under 180 degrees of vision in a narrow spectrum and does not probably know what happened on the spot they are on 400 years ago?)