I will answer your question, but to be clear, I was talking about the caducean divide/rule of the establishment.
To people that take this particular position I would ask them if they are serious or what this is about, because those suggestions are not very appealing.
Cult? No, it sounds more like either shitposting or deranged individuals. To call this a cult you would need to demonstrate a coherent movement of wife rapers in this case.
There are tons of stories in the state-run media denying that it increases taxes. Which as we all know with their 11% trust by the people, are liars.I literally cannot find any source claiming this except you. It's not even in Fox News articles about the bill.
Oh okay, so it's just bullshit you picked up on 8chan or something. Thanks for clarifying.
How predictably disingenous. As if the executive has no part whatsoever in proposing bills or ratifying them into law.
It's literally the reason why the Founders chose not to create a democracy. Learn history. I'm really tired of explaining the basics of everything to all the leftists in this forum. Go.read.a.book.
No shit Sherlock, and the executive both can propose legislation and does sign bills into law. Trump could've just as easily vetoed it if he didn't like it, but if there's one thing he loves it's grifting the poors, which is why the corporate tax cuts stay permanent but middle and lower income tax brackets slowly increase to higher than what they were before. Stop being an idiotic sycophantic simp for anybody, let alone that geriatric orange sack of shit.
You obviously still do not understand how bills are passed, hence the insults. Trump signed what the RINO's passed. Talk to me when you learn to speak like an adult. While you're at it, go watch Schoolhouse Rocks.
LMAO this is 100% what Republicans stand for, including Trump. RINO my ass.
The Dems and Biden had a perfect opportunity to make the tax cuts permanent for the middle class. They chose not to. You gonna ever bring up that point or continue spouting nonsense about something that happened 6 years ago? If the Dems truly were for the little guy, they would eliminate income taxes for everybody making less than $400k, but they never do. And you'll never call them out on it. It's always "bUt DrUmPf" with you people, which makes me wonder why you always look to him to get things done when it's your party who is in complete control of passing laws for almost 2 years now. Weird.
Dems are more about preventing progress from the left than actually opposing the right or its slow descent into fascism. Of course I call them out on it, they're largely useless centrists. That said, the blame falls much less on them for failing to undo shit legislation than it does on the people who created, sponsored, and approved it in the first place. If you choose to ignore that truth and keep falling for every Republican-backed grift, so be it. I can't fix chronic stupidity and gullibility.
You are really falling on your sword to shift blame from your Dem masters. It's not a good look buddy. All that had to happen, at a minimum, was they could have extended the tax cuts for another 2 years. Instead, they raised them, during a recession with record inflation. I realize that your brain is programmed to be a partisan shill and your understanding of even basic economics is on par with your understanding of basic civics, but it's generally a bad idea to do this.
You are a victim of party politics. I´m talking about the big picture. What I said is absolutely correct:
So you are saying people keeping more of their paycheck does not help them provide for their families? Is that your final answer, because I would love to hear you explain how a single mother with a gross pay of $2,000 a month and paying say, $200 a month in taxes, would not benefit from that extra $200 each month? In a normal economy, that could be gas money for the entire month. How would a rich person benefit from a middle class tax cut? Please provide details. This should be good.
TraderPaTX101:
The implication is "passed and passable"
You've been reduced to replying to me in short simple phrases that lack even context.
Ah right I forgot that your a bit smooth brained and lack basic reading comprehension.You've been reduced to replying to me in short simple phrases that lack even context.
more like a reoccurring headache. I don't think I have to explain how laying out an argument works. But here we are with trader refusing to be a honest actor. Since the layout of my argument literately is (boiled down simply)
That's not what I said but hey, what else to expect from the guy who claims with granitic certainty that the Unites States were always meant to be a Republic but not a democracy, claiming that the answer is "in a book" but failing to specify which book (Mein Kampf?), since pretty much any US Law book will argue that the US were always meant to be a democracy. But you know better don't you? You and your ridiculous claims made in other threads, as well.
K3Nv2
SylverReZ
BigOnYa
Kirbydogs
@
BigOnYa:
@
K3Nv2:
