this is just pseudo code, the brick() name even is their own invention, and its existence and the intentionality of it is unsubstantiated by any evidence as of yet.
the fact that they could have added a few hex offsets as proof, which would've taken 10 seconds, but neglected to do so, speaks volumes in my opinion.
So there is now a conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory? Is this, dare I say it, conspiraception?
Says the king of pirates himselfbuy your fucking Games <3
This is what Nintendo was everyone warning about:
Some dumb pirate-cards, that fucks up the system.
Not Gateway's problem. If some of you Guys Simply Buy the Games (No, i mean NOT 1 GAME/YEAR!), this Problem wont matter.
Or are (most of)you still telling me you wanna play homebrew? <3
There are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracy theories. As "conspiracy theories" go, as explained, this isn't far fetched at all:
1) it involves a quite limited amount of individuals (a handful of developers)
2) they form a tight-knit group which (if true) is in fact _already_ a criminal conspiracy involved in facilitating piracy
3) in a position of authority on a very technical issue, easily abused to confound laymen about matters they are unable to ever verify themselves
4) at least one person of this potential group has been proven to be involved in facilitating piracy in the past (Neimod)
Says the king of pirates himself
What's your explanation for all those bluescreen posts that have been appearing since Friday, then?
There are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracy theories. As "conspiracy theories" go, as explained, this isn't far fetched at all:
1) it involves a quite limited amount of individuals (a handful of developers)
2) they form a tight-knit group which (if true) is in fact _already_ a criminal conspiracy involved in facilitating piracy
3) in a position of authority on a very technical issue, easily abused to confound laymen about matters they are unable to ever verify themselves
4) at least one person of this potential group has been proven to be involved in facilitating piracy in the past (Neimod)
What, you mean the one's posted by a bunch of newly created accounts? Couldn't be a certain "handful of developers" stirring up controversy or anything.
Why would anyone do that?
Why would anyone do that?
What, you mean the one's posted by a bunch of newly created accounts? Couldn't be a certain "handful of developers" stirring up controversy or anything.
Except that non-pirates who used normatt's launcher.dat to play legitimate games region-free are also affected.I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
read my previous posts to find out. point 2 is crucial. (hint, MT card is the big winner here)
http://gbatemp.net/threads/bricked-3ds-xl-help.360464/
http://gbatemp.net/threads/help-with-blue-screen-bootrom-8046-error-r4i-deluxe-3dslink.360502/
http://imgur.com/a/TXVhs
http://gbatemp.net/threads/bricked-3ds-xl-help.360464/page-3#post-4881945
etc...
2007/8 isn't exactly newly created in my book. Are they bribing random forum members now, too?
So you are saying that Neimod created Gateway clone?