Don Killah said:Hum... i'm sure that you meant AppleBelly's Coverflow... Cdreams designed the artwork, AB made a lot of code (based on Oggzee's work) and then dropped the project.
i'm the one coding it now...
I know it's not his loader, I have been keeping up with both threads and I have seen some of the drama unfoldWhat I said was "cdreams "coverflow" threads", by that I meant this thread.
QUOTE(BIG MOE @ Apr 18 2009, 08:56 PM)well I guess this should be done when more standard sizes are finalized by authors cause every version so far from the tons of loaders their making might have a new size for images !!! so let's wait for final agreements on sizes wink.gif
No need for this to wait, all that would happen is when the URL is constructed inside the loader to download the cover, it would specify the correct image height and width in the URL. I would imagine the PHP scripts could interperet these two numbers as paramaters to use in the resize process and return a correctly sized image.
@djtaz
With regards to demand for this, I know Dimok of the GUI USB LOADER is talking about using a 3 or four title ID system for their covers and resizing them themselves so as not to have to have multiple covers, which seems a bit rubbish when we have this resource. Obviously the reason for this is they require the width to be 224, not 225 as on the site.
It wouldnt break any existing loaders, it would just give the option for the others that are utilising a multiple of four system.