That was not my point. My point was that Nintendo likes their products to gravitate around a certain gimmick - that's how they create lines of products. With the Wii, the WiiMote was more important then the hardware or the games library - what mattered was the WiiMote.Well, At release? I don't know, Ninty likes blue And yeah, I now remember that they sold the controllers after the ps3...
With the DS, it's dual screens, one of which is a touch screen. It didn't matter if the console will be capable of keeping up with the times - they just advertised the touchscreen to the point of making people sick - everybody and their dog knows that the DS has a touchscreen.
But outside of the gimmicks, what do we get? This sort of an agressive campaign overshadows the weak points of those systems, and they're numerous. The ever-so-famous "but innovation!" stand-point.
When your hardware is lackluster to the point that you "can't do much" with this whole "innovation" you're given then we have a little problem. This is why I'm excited for the WiiU - it's been a while since Nintendo released a console that was up-to-par with its competitors. I sincerely hope for third-party games - you can only bear this much of the plumber and his princess.