Hacking Sigpatches for Atmosphere (Hekate, fss0, fusee & package3)

impeeza

¡Kabito!
Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
6,362
Trophies
3
Age
46
Location
At my chair.
XP
18,736
Country
Colombia
And instructions are not illegal! :3
The DMCA is:


The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM). It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act)

So dmca is about avoid the circumvent of protection measures :(
 

binkinator

Garfield’s Fitness Coach
Member
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Messages
6,511
Trophies
2
XP
6,155
Country
United States
The DMCA is:


The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM). It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act)

So dmca is about avoid the circumvent of protection measures :(

They can rat on US companies not following US law, but everyone outside the US is of course not subject to it.
 
Last edited by binkinator,
  • Sad
Reactions: impeeza

User154

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2021
Messages
254
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
1,264
Country
United Kingdom
The DMCA is:


The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM). It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act)

So dmca is about avoid the circumvent of protection measures :(

Yes, this is a subsection of DMCA that they mention in the notice served to github is one that covers this.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201
(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that—
(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person’s knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

However Github state:

"While GitHub did not find sufficient information to determine a valid anti-circumvention claim, we determined that this takedown notice contains other valid copyright claim(s)."

I would be interested to know what those other valid claims are though, as it has been previously mentioned in this topic, the sigpatches don't contain anything Nintendo owns the copyright to.

They can rat on US companies not following US law, but everyone outside the US is of course not subject to it.

True, but a lot of other countries have equivalent law to cover the same things. Here in the UK for example this would be covered by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. There is a section that states pretty much the same thing, just worded slightly differently.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpg...devices-designed-to-circumvent-copyprotection

296 Devices designed to circumvent copy-protection.

(1)This section applies where—

(a)a technical device has been applied to a computer program; and

(b)a person (A) knowing or having reason to believe that it will be used to make infringing copies—

(i)manufactures for sale or hire, imports, distributes, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, advertises for sale or hire or has in his possession for commercial purposes any means the sole intended purpose of which is to facilitate the unauthorised removal or circumvention of the technical device; or

(ii)publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to remove or circumvent the technical device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: binkinator

Gep_Etto

Being late since '88
Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
375
Trophies
0
XP
1,154
Country
Brazil
DMCA and all copyright laws need to be repealed.
Another Mario-loving commie, I see!

I'd agree with your sentiment if you had said that our copyright system needs a reform. It absolutely does, but it shouldn't be abolished entirely. It's a terrible implementation of a very fair idea, which is simply that people should have the right to be compensated for their work. People should hold copyright, not companies - that'd be a good starting point for a reform. But abolishing copyright altogether is a terrible idea.

Without copyright laws, it would be impossible for people to make a living in any creative field, especially in digital media where there's no "original" copy to be auctioned off (NFTs nonwithstanding). Why spend two years writing a book when any entrepreneur with a printing press can buy one copy, scan it and distribute tens of thousands of cheaper copies without giving you a single cent for your work? Why carefully develop and rigorously test a game if everyone can just legally pirate it? How will you put food on the table?

There's also the integrity of the work to consider. Do you think the Star Wars sequel trilogy was bad? Well, be thankful that Disney holds the copyright to that fictional universe with an iron fist, or first PornHub, then the whole world would be flooded with cinematographic masterpieces such as "Jabba the Hut puts his slimy green rod inside a girl who kind of looks like Carrie Fischer dressed in a slave Leia outfit, episode II, part XI: The Rise of Hutt *wink wink*", running time: (thankfully) six minutes because the neckbeard in the Jabba costume had an accident. And there would be nothing anyone could do to stop it.

DMCA is against 1st Amendment!
lolnope, that's just you being a silly goose.
 

linuxares

The inadequate, autocratic beast!
Global Moderator
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
13,328
Trophies
2
XP
18,195
Country
Sweden
DMCA is against 1st Amendment! DMCA and all copyright laws need to be repealed.
1st amendment only is for state, that they can't press against you. Nothing about civil matters.

Yes, the DMCA and Copyright laws in the US really needs to be seen over. Disney really helped to mess them up.
 

impeeza

¡Kabito!
Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
6,362
Trophies
3
Age
46
Location
At my chair.
XP
18,736
Country
Colombia
Yes, this is a subsection of DMCA that they mention in the notice served to github is one that covers this.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201
(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that—
(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;
(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title; or
(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person’s knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

However Github state:

"While GitHub did not find sufficient information to determine a valid anti-circumvention claim, we determined that this takedown notice contains other valid copyright claim(s)."

I would be interested to know what those other valid claims are though, as it has been previously mentioned in this topic, the sigpatches don't contain anything Nintendo owns the copyright to.



True, but a lot of other countries have equivalent law to cover the same things. Here in the UK for example this would be covered by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. There is a section that states pretty much the same thing, just worded slightly differently.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpg...devices-designed-to-circumvent-copyprotection

296 Devices designed to circumvent copy-protection.

(1)This section applies where—

(a)a technical device has been applied to a computer program; and

(b)a person (A) knowing or having reason to believe that it will be used to make infringing copies—

(i)manufactures for sale or hire, imports, distributes, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, advertises for sale or hire or has in his possession for commercial purposes any means the sole intended purpose of which is to facilitate the unauthorised removal or circumvention of the technical device; or

(ii)publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to remove or circumvent the technical device.
that's why Ninty can prohibit the sale of paperclip on all USA!!!!
 

chrisrlink

Has a PhD in dueling
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
5,562
Trophies
2
Location
duel acadamia
XP
5,744
Country
United States
1st amendment only is for state, that they can't press against you. Nothing about civil matters.

Yes, the DMCA and Copyright laws in the US really needs to be seen over. Disney really helped to mess them up.
not entirely true as the copyright infringement case like TX/Doug bowser specificly was BOTH criminal and civil though i just read the max for CRI was250,000 USD Per offense how many CRI offenses dd he do?
 

linuxares

The inadequate, autocratic beast!
Global Moderator
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
13,328
Trophies
2
XP
18,195
Country
Sweden
not entirely true as the copyright infringement case like TX/Doug bowser specificly was BOTH criminal and civil though i just read the max for CRI was250,000 USD Per offense how many CRI offenses dd he do?
Well it was multiple charges for selling these devices. Often copyright is a civil matter, but I do understand where you come from.
 

Gorkensnorkel

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
386
Trophies
0
Age
47
XP
504
Country
United States
Hey, so I am about to update my switch after a long hiatus and just wanted to ask what firmware I should update to so the latest Sig patches work?
 

Gorkensnorkel

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
386
Trophies
0
Age
47
XP
504
Country
United States
Ok, so update to 14.1.2 then. What is the pack of op? Is that the Sig patches linked on the first page of this thread?

I see there is a "rebootless update" and I have never heard of that before, any idea what that is? Just curious.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Veho @ Veho: It's how we used to cheat at Pokewalker.